Framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link?
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Freud's legacy deriving from his work The project for a scientific psychology (1895) could give a new impetus to the dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences. A rapproachment phase is warrented. Based on the work of psychoanalysts who are themselves...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2007-11-01
|
Series: | Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine |
Online Access: | http://www.peh-med.com/content/2/1/25 |
id |
doaj-4cae0e3684ce4c67a998b47dc993735e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4cae0e3684ce4c67a998b47dc993735e2020-11-24T21:45:12ZengBMCPhilosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine1747-53412007-11-01212510.1186/1747-5341-2-25Framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link?Vaslamatzis Grigoris<p>Abstract</p> <p>Freud's legacy deriving from his work The project for a scientific psychology (1895) could give a new impetus to the dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences. A rapproachment phase is warrented. Based on the work of psychoanalysts who are themselves neuroscientists (such as Mauro Mancia, Martha Koukkou and Harold Shevrin) or have a long term dialogue with neuroscientists (Arnold Modell), three points of epistemological congruence are described:</p> <p>1. dualism is no longer a satisfactory solution</p> <p>2. cautions for the centrality of interpretation (hermeneutics)</p> <p>3. the self-criticism of neuroscientists</p> http://www.peh-med.com/content/2/1/25 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vaslamatzis Grigoris |
spellingShingle |
Vaslamatzis Grigoris Framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine |
author_facet |
Vaslamatzis Grigoris |
author_sort |
Vaslamatzis Grigoris |
title |
Framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link? |
title_short |
Framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link? |
title_full |
Framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link? |
title_fullStr |
Framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link? |
title_sort |
framework for a new dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences: is the combined neuro-psychoanalytic approach the missing link? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine |
issn |
1747-5341 |
publishDate |
2007-11-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Freud's legacy deriving from his work The project for a scientific psychology (1895) could give a new impetus to the dialogue between psychoanalysis and neurosciences. A rapproachment phase is warrented. Based on the work of psychoanalysts who are themselves neuroscientists (such as Mauro Mancia, Martha Koukkou and Harold Shevrin) or have a long term dialogue with neuroscientists (Arnold Modell), three points of epistemological congruence are described:</p> <p>1. dualism is no longer a satisfactory solution</p> <p>2. cautions for the centrality of interpretation (hermeneutics)</p> <p>3. the self-criticism of neuroscientists</p> |
url |
http://www.peh-med.com/content/2/1/25 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vaslamatzisgrigoris frameworkforanewdialoguebetweenpsychoanalysisandneurosciencesisthecombinedneuropsychoanalyticapproachthemissinglink |
_version_ |
1725906026014703616 |