‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism

Multiculturalism is a controversial concept and a debated topic. To develop scientific analysis and inform political discussions, it is important to study how lay people evaluate it. Previous research has mostly regarded attitudes towards multiculturalism as unidimensional. This research often relie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma Nortio, Tuuli Anna Renvik, Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Helsinki University Press 2020-05-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Migration Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal-njmr.org/articles/135
id doaj-4cadad31a6ec403896ed72cb5f305ed4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cadad31a6ec403896ed72cb5f305ed42020-11-25T03:44:37ZengHelsinki University PressNordic Journal of Migration Research1799-649X2020-05-0110210.33134/njmr.135309‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards MulticulturalismEmma Nortio0Tuuli Anna Renvik1Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti2Social Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiOpen University, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiSocial Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiMulticulturalism is a controversial concept and a debated topic. To develop scientific analysis and inform political discussions, it is important to study how lay people evaluate it. Previous research has mostly regarded attitudes towards multiculturalism as unidimensional. This research often relies on the operationalisation offered by the Multicultural Ideology Scale (MIS), in which minorities’ cultural maintenance and acceptance of cultural diversity are central. In this multimethod study, we take a critical perspective on such operationalisation and examine majority of Finns’ responses to MIS in a survey and in focus group discussions. By approaching evaluation processes as social interaction, we challenge the unidimensionality assumption of attitudes towards multiculturalism. We show how cultural essentialism and nationalism are used in arguing for and against multiculturalism, and in negotiating its boundaries so that the majority can keep its dominant position. This conflicts with recognition and equality that are widely considered as cornerstones of multiculturalism.https://journal-njmr.org/articles/135multiculturalismattitudesqualitative methodsacculturationintergroup relationslay discourse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emma Nortio
Tuuli Anna Renvik
Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
spellingShingle Emma Nortio
Tuuli Anna Renvik
Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism
Nordic Journal of Migration Research
multiculturalism
attitudes
qualitative methods
acculturation
intergroup relations
lay discourse
author_facet Emma Nortio
Tuuli Anna Renvik
Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti
author_sort Emma Nortio
title ‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism
title_short ‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism
title_full ‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism
title_fullStr ‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism
title_full_unstemmed ‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism
title_sort ‘as a native person, why should i adapt?’: a multimethod approach to majority finns’ attitudes towards multiculturalism
publisher Helsinki University Press
series Nordic Journal of Migration Research
issn 1799-649X
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Multiculturalism is a controversial concept and a debated topic. To develop scientific analysis and inform political discussions, it is important to study how lay people evaluate it. Previous research has mostly regarded attitudes towards multiculturalism as unidimensional. This research often relies on the operationalisation offered by the Multicultural Ideology Scale (MIS), in which minorities’ cultural maintenance and acceptance of cultural diversity are central. In this multimethod study, we take a critical perspective on such operationalisation and examine majority of Finns’ responses to MIS in a survey and in focus group discussions. By approaching evaluation processes as social interaction, we challenge the unidimensionality assumption of attitudes towards multiculturalism. We show how cultural essentialism and nationalism are used in arguing for and against multiculturalism, and in negotiating its boundaries so that the majority can keep its dominant position. This conflicts with recognition and equality that are widely considered as cornerstones of multiculturalism.
topic multiculturalism
attitudes
qualitative methods
acculturation
intergroup relations
lay discourse
url https://journal-njmr.org/articles/135
work_keys_str_mv AT emmanortio asanativepersonwhyshouldiadaptamultimethodapproachtomajorityfinnsattitudestowardsmulticulturalism
AT tuuliannarenvik asanativepersonwhyshouldiadaptamultimethodapproachtomajorityfinnsattitudestowardsmulticulturalism
AT ingajasinskajalahti asanativepersonwhyshouldiadaptamultimethodapproachtomajorityfinnsattitudestowardsmulticulturalism
_version_ 1724513753764986880