‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism
Multiculturalism is a controversial concept and a debated topic. To develop scientific analysis and inform political discussions, it is important to study how lay people evaluate it. Previous research has mostly regarded attitudes towards multiculturalism as unidimensional. This research often relie...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Helsinki University Press
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Nordic Journal of Migration Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal-njmr.org/articles/135 |
id |
doaj-4cadad31a6ec403896ed72cb5f305ed4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4cadad31a6ec403896ed72cb5f305ed42020-11-25T03:44:37ZengHelsinki University PressNordic Journal of Migration Research1799-649X2020-05-0110210.33134/njmr.135309‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards MulticulturalismEmma Nortio0Tuuli Anna Renvik1Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti2Social Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiOpen University, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiSocial Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, HelsinkiMulticulturalism is a controversial concept and a debated topic. To develop scientific analysis and inform political discussions, it is important to study how lay people evaluate it. Previous research has mostly regarded attitudes towards multiculturalism as unidimensional. This research often relies on the operationalisation offered by the Multicultural Ideology Scale (MIS), in which minorities’ cultural maintenance and acceptance of cultural diversity are central. In this multimethod study, we take a critical perspective on such operationalisation and examine majority of Finns’ responses to MIS in a survey and in focus group discussions. By approaching evaluation processes as social interaction, we challenge the unidimensionality assumption of attitudes towards multiculturalism. We show how cultural essentialism and nationalism are used in arguing for and against multiculturalism, and in negotiating its boundaries so that the majority can keep its dominant position. This conflicts with recognition and equality that are widely considered as cornerstones of multiculturalism.https://journal-njmr.org/articles/135multiculturalismattitudesqualitative methodsacculturationintergroup relationslay discourse |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emma Nortio Tuuli Anna Renvik Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti |
spellingShingle |
Emma Nortio Tuuli Anna Renvik Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti ‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism Nordic Journal of Migration Research multiculturalism attitudes qualitative methods acculturation intergroup relations lay discourse |
author_facet |
Emma Nortio Tuuli Anna Renvik Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti |
author_sort |
Emma Nortio |
title |
‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism |
title_short |
‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism |
title_full |
‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism |
title_fullStr |
‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism |
title_full_unstemmed |
‘As a Native Person, Why Should I Adapt?’: A Multimethod Approach to Majority Finns’ Attitudes Towards Multiculturalism |
title_sort |
‘as a native person, why should i adapt?’: a multimethod approach to majority finns’ attitudes towards multiculturalism |
publisher |
Helsinki University Press |
series |
Nordic Journal of Migration Research |
issn |
1799-649X |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Multiculturalism is a controversial concept and a debated topic. To develop scientific analysis and inform political discussions, it is important to study how lay people evaluate it. Previous research has mostly regarded attitudes towards multiculturalism as unidimensional. This research often relies on the operationalisation offered by the Multicultural Ideology Scale (MIS), in which minorities’ cultural maintenance and acceptance of cultural diversity are central. In this multimethod study, we take a critical perspective on such operationalisation and examine majority of Finns’ responses to MIS in a survey and in focus group discussions. By approaching evaluation processes as social interaction, we challenge the unidimensionality assumption of attitudes towards multiculturalism. We show how cultural essentialism and nationalism are used in arguing for and against multiculturalism, and in negotiating its boundaries so that the majority can keep its dominant position. This conflicts with recognition and equality that are widely considered as cornerstones of multiculturalism. |
topic |
multiculturalism attitudes qualitative methods acculturation intergroup relations lay discourse |
url |
https://journal-njmr.org/articles/135 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emmanortio asanativepersonwhyshouldiadaptamultimethodapproachtomajorityfinnsattitudestowardsmulticulturalism AT tuuliannarenvik asanativepersonwhyshouldiadaptamultimethodapproachtomajorityfinnsattitudestowardsmulticulturalism AT ingajasinskajalahti asanativepersonwhyshouldiadaptamultimethodapproachtomajorityfinnsattitudestowardsmulticulturalism |
_version_ |
1724513753764986880 |