Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content

[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] Authenticity is a fundamental issue for the long-term preservation of digital objects; however, the validation of authenticity is a complex task – it requires the representation of provenance as a precondition for trust. For that matter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Regina Varnienė-Janssen, Jūratė Kuprienė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2018-12-01
Series:Informacijos Mokslai
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journals.vu.lt/informacijos-mokslai/article/view/12291
id doaj-4ca69f17dea64c83996cf3986f85775e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ca69f17dea64c83996cf3986f85775e2020-11-25T03:25:19ZengVilnius University PressInformacijos Mokslai1392-05611392-14872018-12-018210.15388/Im.2018.82.9Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of ContentRegina Varnienė-Janssen0Jūratė Kuprienė1Vilnius Universityindependent researcher [full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] Authenticity is a fundamental issue for the long-term preservation of digital objects; however, the validation of authenticity is a complex task – it requires the representation of provenance as a precondition for trust. For that matter, it is crucial to define the key conceptual elements that provide the foundation for such a complex framework. The main objective of this paper is to define how authenticity has to be managed in the digital preservation process: to identify the semantic units needed to support core preservation functions in order to ensure the trustworthiness of digital objects and ensure interoperability – i.e., the ability to exchange data between institutions. This paper presents results from the first stage of the research: the scope of authenticity and provenance content needed to support core preservation functions and ensure interoperability – the ability to exchange data between institutions and assess the added value of the Europeana and VEPIS regarding authenticity and provenance based on the adequacy of analyzed international models for authenticity and provenance. Methodology: by applying the EU 2–3–6 concept of added value for electronic publishing and qualitative content analysis of research literature, we conceptualized the Content Creation Process, which refers to the structure and meaning of authenticity and provenance. This approach enabled us to identify the scope of the content of authenticity and provenance. http://www.journals.vu.lt/informacijos-mokslai/article/view/12291authenticityprovenancetrustdigital environmentdata qualitytrustworthiness of digital objects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Regina Varnienė-Janssen
Jūratė Kuprienė
spellingShingle Regina Varnienė-Janssen
Jūratė Kuprienė
Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content
Informacijos Mokslai
authenticity
provenance
trust
digital environment
data quality
trustworthiness of digital objects
author_facet Regina Varnienė-Janssen
Jūratė Kuprienė
author_sort Regina Varnienė-Janssen
title Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content
title_short Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content
title_full Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content
title_fullStr Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content
title_full_unstemmed Authenticity and Provenance in Long-Term Digital Preservation: Analysis of the Scope of Content
title_sort authenticity and provenance in long-term digital preservation: analysis of the scope of content
publisher Vilnius University Press
series Informacijos Mokslai
issn 1392-0561
1392-1487
publishDate 2018-12-01
description [full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] Authenticity is a fundamental issue for the long-term preservation of digital objects; however, the validation of authenticity is a complex task – it requires the representation of provenance as a precondition for trust. For that matter, it is crucial to define the key conceptual elements that provide the foundation for such a complex framework. The main objective of this paper is to define how authenticity has to be managed in the digital preservation process: to identify the semantic units needed to support core preservation functions in order to ensure the trustworthiness of digital objects and ensure interoperability – i.e., the ability to exchange data between institutions. This paper presents results from the first stage of the research: the scope of authenticity and provenance content needed to support core preservation functions and ensure interoperability – the ability to exchange data between institutions and assess the added value of the Europeana and VEPIS regarding authenticity and provenance based on the adequacy of analyzed international models for authenticity and provenance. Methodology: by applying the EU 2–3–6 concept of added value for electronic publishing and qualitative content analysis of research literature, we conceptualized the Content Creation Process, which refers to the structure and meaning of authenticity and provenance. This approach enabled us to identify the scope of the content of authenticity and provenance.
topic authenticity
provenance
trust
digital environment
data quality
trustworthiness of digital objects
url http://www.journals.vu.lt/informacijos-mokslai/article/view/12291
work_keys_str_mv AT reginavarnienejanssen authenticityandprovenanceinlongtermdigitalpreservationanalysisofthescopeofcontent
AT juratekupriene authenticityandprovenanceinlongtermdigitalpreservationanalysisofthescopeofcontent
_version_ 1724597650035048448