Extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.

Accurate estimation of soil water retention curve (SWRC) at the dry region is required to describe the relation between soil water content and matric suction from saturation to oven dryness. In this study, the extrapolative capability of two models for predicting the complete SWRC from limited range...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sen Lu, Tusheng Ren, Yili Lu, Ping Meng, Shiyou Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4252034?pdf=render
id doaj-4ca39e743a34443bb117c8c4e9e1f854
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ca39e743a34443bb117c8c4e9e1f8542020-11-25T01:27:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01912e11351810.1371/journal.pone.0113518Extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.Sen LuTusheng RenYili LuPing MengShiyou SunAccurate estimation of soil water retention curve (SWRC) at the dry region is required to describe the relation between soil water content and matric suction from saturation to oven dryness. In this study, the extrapolative capability of two models for predicting the complete SWRC from limited ranges of soil water retention data was evaluated. When the model parameters were obtained from SWRC data in the 0-1500 kPa range, the FX model (Fredlund and Xing, 1994) estimations agreed well with measurements from saturation to oven dryness with RMSEs less than 0.01. The GG model (Groenevelt and Grant, 2004) produced larger errors at the dry region, with significantly larger RMSEs and MEs than the FX model. Further evaluations indicated that when SWRC measurements in the 0-100 kPa suction range was applied for model establishment, the FX model was capable of producing acceptable SWRCs across the entire water content range. For a higher accuracy, the FX model requires soil water retention data at least in the 0- to 300-kPa range to extend the SWRC to oven dryness. Comparing with the Khlosi et al. (2006) model, which requires measurements in the 0-500 kPa range to reproduce the complete SWRCs, the FX model has the advantage of requiring less SWRC measurements. Thus the FX modeling approach has the potential to eliminate the processes for measuring soil water retention in the dry range.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4252034?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sen Lu
Tusheng Ren
Yili Lu
Ping Meng
Shiyou Sun
spellingShingle Sen Lu
Tusheng Ren
Yili Lu
Ping Meng
Shiyou Sun
Extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sen Lu
Tusheng Ren
Yili Lu
Ping Meng
Shiyou Sun
author_sort Sen Lu
title Extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.
title_short Extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.
title_full Extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.
title_fullStr Extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.
title_full_unstemmed Extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.
title_sort extrapolative capability of two models that estimating soil water retention curve between saturation and oven dryness.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Accurate estimation of soil water retention curve (SWRC) at the dry region is required to describe the relation between soil water content and matric suction from saturation to oven dryness. In this study, the extrapolative capability of two models for predicting the complete SWRC from limited ranges of soil water retention data was evaluated. When the model parameters were obtained from SWRC data in the 0-1500 kPa range, the FX model (Fredlund and Xing, 1994) estimations agreed well with measurements from saturation to oven dryness with RMSEs less than 0.01. The GG model (Groenevelt and Grant, 2004) produced larger errors at the dry region, with significantly larger RMSEs and MEs than the FX model. Further evaluations indicated that when SWRC measurements in the 0-100 kPa suction range was applied for model establishment, the FX model was capable of producing acceptable SWRCs across the entire water content range. For a higher accuracy, the FX model requires soil water retention data at least in the 0- to 300-kPa range to extend the SWRC to oven dryness. Comparing with the Khlosi et al. (2006) model, which requires measurements in the 0-500 kPa range to reproduce the complete SWRCs, the FX model has the advantage of requiring less SWRC measurements. Thus the FX modeling approach has the potential to eliminate the processes for measuring soil water retention in the dry range.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4252034?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT senlu extrapolativecapabilityoftwomodelsthatestimatingsoilwaterretentioncurvebetweensaturationandovendryness
AT tushengren extrapolativecapabilityoftwomodelsthatestimatingsoilwaterretentioncurvebetweensaturationandovendryness
AT yililu extrapolativecapabilityoftwomodelsthatestimatingsoilwaterretentioncurvebetweensaturationandovendryness
AT pingmeng extrapolativecapabilityoftwomodelsthatestimatingsoilwaterretentioncurvebetweensaturationandovendryness
AT shiyousun extrapolativecapabilityoftwomodelsthatestimatingsoilwaterretentioncurvebetweensaturationandovendryness
_version_ 1725103670994927616