Critical care EEG standardized nomenclature in clinical practice: Strengths, limitations, and outlook on the example of prognostication after cardiac arrest
We discuss the achievements of the ACNS critical care EEG nomenclature proposed in 2013 and, from a clinical angle, outline some limitations regarding translation into treatment implications. While the recently proposed updated 2021 version of the nomenclature will probable improve some uncertainty...
Main Authors: | Pia De Stefano, Margitta Seeck, Andrea O. Rossetti |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Clinical Neurophysiology Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X21000123 |
Similar Items
-
Clinical and Electrophysiological Differentiation between Periodical and Epileptic Discharges
by: Vitaliy V. Podlepich, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Accuracy of Interictal and Ictal Electric and Magnetic Source Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Praveen Sharma, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
A major miss in prognostication after cardiac arrest: Burst suppression and brain healing
by: Danielle A. Becker, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Ictal-interictal continuum: a review of recent advancements
by: James X. Tao, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Cardiac arrest associated with epileptic seizures: A case report with simultaneous EEG and ECG
by: Jafar Mehvari, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)