Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments

Abstract This study aimed to assess how female breast cancer survivors (BCS) respond physiologically, hematologically, and perceptually to exercise under heat stress compared to females with no history of breast cancer (CON). Twenty‐one females (9 BCS and 12 CON [age; 54 ± 7 years, stature; 167 ± 6 ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca L. Relf, Ben J. Lee, Gregor Eichhorn, Melanie S. Flint, Louisa Beale, Neil Maxwell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-07-01
Series:Physiological Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14968
id doaj-4c8dc6a5cf6848c6bdc2cd34582f5268
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c8dc6a5cf6848c6bdc2cd34582f52682021-08-23T05:00:48ZengWileyPhysiological Reports2051-817X2021-07-01914n/an/a10.14814/phy2.14968Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environmentsRebecca L. Relf0Ben J. Lee1Gregor Eichhorn2Melanie S. Flint3Louisa Beale4Neil Maxwell5Environmental Extremes Laboratory University of Brighton Eastbourne UKOccupational and Environmental Physiology Group Coventry University Coventry UKEnvironmental Extremes Laboratory University of Brighton Eastbourne UKCancer Stress Laboratory University of Brighton Moulsecoomb UKEnvironmental Extremes Laboratory University of Brighton Eastbourne UKEnvironmental Extremes Laboratory University of Brighton Eastbourne UKAbstract This study aimed to assess how female breast cancer survivors (BCS) respond physiologically, hematologically, and perceptually to exercise under heat stress compared to females with no history of breast cancer (CON). Twenty‐one females (9 BCS and 12 CON [age; 54 ± 7 years, stature; 167 ± 6 cm, body mass; 68.1 ± 7.62 kg, and body fat; 30.9 ± 3.8%]) completed a warm (25℃, 50% relative humidity, RH) and hot (35℃, 50%RH) trial in a repeated‐measures crossover design. Trials consisted of 30 min of rest, 30 min of walking at 4 metabolic equivalents, and a 6‐minute walk test (6MWT). Physiological measurements (core temperature (Tre), skin temperature (Tskin), heart rate (HR), and sweat analysis) and perceptual rating scales (ratings of perceived exertion, thermal sensation [whole body and localized], and thermal comfort) were taken at 5‐ and 10‐min intervals throughout, respectively. Venous blood samples were taken before and after to assess; IL‐6, IL‐10, CRP, IFN‐γ, and TGF‐β1. All physiological markers were higher during the 35 versus 25℃ trial; Tre (~0.25℃, p = 0.002), Tskin (~3.8℃, p < 0.001), HR (~12 beats·min−1, p = 0.023), and whole‐body sweat rate (~0.4 L·hr−1, p < 0.001), with no difference observed between groups in either condition (p > 0.05). Both groups covered a greater 6MWT distance in 25 versus 35℃ (by ~200 m; p = 0.003). Nevertheless, the control group covered more distance than BCS, regardless of environmental temperature (by ~400 m, p = 0.03). Thermoregulation was not disadvantaged in BCS compared to controls during moderate‐intensity exercise under heat stress. However, self‐paced exercise performance was reduced for BCS regardless of environmental temperature.https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14968breast cancerfemalesheat reactionsheat stressinflammation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rebecca L. Relf
Ben J. Lee
Gregor Eichhorn
Melanie S. Flint
Louisa Beale
Neil Maxwell
spellingShingle Rebecca L. Relf
Ben J. Lee
Gregor Eichhorn
Melanie S. Flint
Louisa Beale
Neil Maxwell
Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments
Physiological Reports
breast cancer
females
heat reactions
heat stress
inflammation
author_facet Rebecca L. Relf
Ben J. Lee
Gregor Eichhorn
Melanie S. Flint
Louisa Beale
Neil Maxwell
author_sort Rebecca L. Relf
title Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments
title_short Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments
title_full Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments
title_fullStr Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments
title_full_unstemmed Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments
title_sort thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate‐intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments
publisher Wiley
series Physiological Reports
issn 2051-817X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract This study aimed to assess how female breast cancer survivors (BCS) respond physiologically, hematologically, and perceptually to exercise under heat stress compared to females with no history of breast cancer (CON). Twenty‐one females (9 BCS and 12 CON [age; 54 ± 7 years, stature; 167 ± 6 cm, body mass; 68.1 ± 7.62 kg, and body fat; 30.9 ± 3.8%]) completed a warm (25℃, 50% relative humidity, RH) and hot (35℃, 50%RH) trial in a repeated‐measures crossover design. Trials consisted of 30 min of rest, 30 min of walking at 4 metabolic equivalents, and a 6‐minute walk test (6MWT). Physiological measurements (core temperature (Tre), skin temperature (Tskin), heart rate (HR), and sweat analysis) and perceptual rating scales (ratings of perceived exertion, thermal sensation [whole body and localized], and thermal comfort) were taken at 5‐ and 10‐min intervals throughout, respectively. Venous blood samples were taken before and after to assess; IL‐6, IL‐10, CRP, IFN‐γ, and TGF‐β1. All physiological markers were higher during the 35 versus 25℃ trial; Tre (~0.25℃, p = 0.002), Tskin (~3.8℃, p < 0.001), HR (~12 beats·min−1, p = 0.023), and whole‐body sweat rate (~0.4 L·hr−1, p < 0.001), with no difference observed between groups in either condition (p > 0.05). Both groups covered a greater 6MWT distance in 25 versus 35℃ (by ~200 m; p = 0.003). Nevertheless, the control group covered more distance than BCS, regardless of environmental temperature (by ~400 m, p = 0.03). Thermoregulation was not disadvantaged in BCS compared to controls during moderate‐intensity exercise under heat stress. However, self‐paced exercise performance was reduced for BCS regardless of environmental temperature.
topic breast cancer
females
heat reactions
heat stress
inflammation
url https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14968
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccalrelf thermoregulationisnotimpairedinbreastcancersurvivorsduringmoderateintensityexerciseperformedinwarmandhotenvironments
AT benjlee thermoregulationisnotimpairedinbreastcancersurvivorsduringmoderateintensityexerciseperformedinwarmandhotenvironments
AT gregoreichhorn thermoregulationisnotimpairedinbreastcancersurvivorsduringmoderateintensityexerciseperformedinwarmandhotenvironments
AT melaniesflint thermoregulationisnotimpairedinbreastcancersurvivorsduringmoderateintensityexerciseperformedinwarmandhotenvironments
AT louisabeale thermoregulationisnotimpairedinbreastcancersurvivorsduringmoderateintensityexerciseperformedinwarmandhotenvironments
AT neilmaxwell thermoregulationisnotimpairedinbreastcancersurvivorsduringmoderateintensityexerciseperformedinwarmandhotenvironments
_version_ 1721198744634916864