Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies

Land protection policies such as creating and preserving national parks have been promoted to counter global threats to the environment and to conserve biodiversity. We know little, however, about the country characteristics that might be good predictors of whether states will choose to protect land...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Candace Archer, Shannon Orr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2008-07-01
Series:Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss1/0711-028.archer.html
id doaj-4c7f7d85a7364aad8b7b7d689ee51b0c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c7f7d85a7364aad8b7b7d689ee51b0c2020-11-25T00:39:16ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy1548-77332008-07-01412537Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policiesCandace ArcherShannon OrrLand protection policies such as creating and preserving national parks have been promoted to counter global threats to the environment and to conserve biodiversity. We know little, however, about the country characteristics that might be good predictors of whether states will choose to protect land or not. What factors within a state need to be the focus of global attention or need to be encouraged to promote land-protection policies? Using the global standard of 10% ecoregion protection, we test four categories of predictors–biodiversity, environmental threats, politics (such as treaty participation and NGO activity), and economics (such as GDP and trade measures)–as well as a multidimensional model in a multivariate analysis of 129 countries. Our findings suggest that the multidimensional model best predicts when it is likely that a country will protect land. While a number of key variables such as economic are not supported, the environmental threats model presents us with the strongest individual reason for land protection. http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss1/0711-028.archer.htmlnatural areas protectionbiodiversitygeopoliticseconomic factorsenvironmental impact sourcesenvironmental managementsustainability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Candace Archer
Shannon Orr
spellingShingle Candace Archer
Shannon Orr
Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies
Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
natural areas protection
biodiversity
geopolitics
economic factors
environmental impact sources
environmental management
sustainability
author_facet Candace Archer
Shannon Orr
author_sort Candace Archer
title Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies
title_short Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies
title_full Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies
title_fullStr Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies
title_full_unstemmed Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies
title_sort protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy
issn 1548-7733
publishDate 2008-07-01
description Land protection policies such as creating and preserving national parks have been promoted to counter global threats to the environment and to conserve biodiversity. We know little, however, about the country characteristics that might be good predictors of whether states will choose to protect land or not. What factors within a state need to be the focus of global attention or need to be encouraged to promote land-protection policies? Using the global standard of 10% ecoregion protection, we test four categories of predictors–biodiversity, environmental threats, politics (such as treaty participation and NGO activity), and economics (such as GDP and trade measures)–as well as a multidimensional model in a multivariate analysis of 129 countries. Our findings suggest that the multidimensional model best predicts when it is likely that a country will protect land. While a number of key variables such as economic are not supported, the environmental threats model presents us with the strongest individual reason for land protection.
topic natural areas protection
biodiversity
geopolitics
economic factors
environmental impact sources
environmental management
sustainability
url http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss1/0711-028.archer.html
work_keys_str_mv AT candacearcher protectingparadiseacrossnationalanalysisofbiomeprotectionpolicies
AT shannonorr protectingparadiseacrossnationalanalysisofbiomeprotectionpolicies
_version_ 1725294208140443648