Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies
Land protection policies such as creating and preserving national parks have been promoted to counter global threats to the environment and to conserve biodiversity. We know little, however, about the country characteristics that might be good predictors of whether states will choose to protect land...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2008-07-01
|
Series: | Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss1/0711-028.archer.html |
id |
doaj-4c7f7d85a7364aad8b7b7d689ee51b0c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4c7f7d85a7364aad8b7b7d689ee51b0c2020-11-25T00:39:16ZengTaylor & Francis GroupSustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy1548-77332008-07-01412537Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policiesCandace ArcherShannon OrrLand protection policies such as creating and preserving national parks have been promoted to counter global threats to the environment and to conserve biodiversity. We know little, however, about the country characteristics that might be good predictors of whether states will choose to protect land or not. What factors within a state need to be the focus of global attention or need to be encouraged to promote land-protection policies? Using the global standard of 10% ecoregion protection, we test four categories of predictors–biodiversity, environmental threats, politics (such as treaty participation and NGO activity), and economics (such as GDP and trade measures)–as well as a multidimensional model in a multivariate analysis of 129 countries. Our findings suggest that the multidimensional model best predicts when it is likely that a country will protect land. While a number of key variables such as economic are not supported, the environmental threats model presents us with the strongest individual reason for land protection. http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss1/0711-028.archer.htmlnatural areas protectionbiodiversitygeopoliticseconomic factorsenvironmental impact sourcesenvironmental managementsustainability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Candace Archer Shannon Orr |
spellingShingle |
Candace Archer Shannon Orr Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy natural areas protection biodiversity geopolitics economic factors environmental impact sources environmental management sustainability |
author_facet |
Candace Archer Shannon Orr |
author_sort |
Candace Archer |
title |
Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies |
title_short |
Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies |
title_full |
Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies |
title_fullStr |
Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies |
title_sort |
protecting paradise: a cross-national analysis of biome-protection policies |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy |
issn |
1548-7733 |
publishDate |
2008-07-01 |
description |
Land protection policies such as creating and preserving national parks have been promoted to counter global threats to the environment and to conserve biodiversity. We know little, however, about the country characteristics that might be good predictors of whether states will choose to protect land or not. What factors within a state need to be the focus of global attention or need to be encouraged to promote land-protection policies? Using the global standard of 10% ecoregion protection, we test four categories of predictors–biodiversity, environmental threats, politics (such as treaty participation and NGO activity), and economics (such as GDP and trade measures)–as well as a multidimensional model in a multivariate analysis of 129 countries. Our findings suggest that the multidimensional model best predicts when it is likely that a country will protect land. While a number of key variables such as economic are not supported, the environmental threats model presents us with the strongest individual reason for land protection. |
topic |
natural areas protection biodiversity geopolitics economic factors environmental impact sources environmental management sustainability |
url |
http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss1/0711-028.archer.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT candacearcher protectingparadiseacrossnationalanalysisofbiomeprotectionpolicies AT shannonorr protectingparadiseacrossnationalanalysisofbiomeprotectionpolicies |
_version_ |
1725294208140443648 |