Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading

Theories of literary ethics often emphasize either content or the structural relationship between text and reader, and they tend to bracket pedagogy. This essay advocates instead for an approach that sees literary representation and readerly attention as interanimating and that considers teaching an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cynthia R. Wallace
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:Humanities
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/4/164
id doaj-4c7f6657e97249e2948a1bebfee75f00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c7f6657e97249e2948a1bebfee75f002020-11-25T01:56:45ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872019-10-018416410.3390/h8040164h8040164Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of ReadingCynthia R. Wallace0Department of English, St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W6, CanadaTheories of literary ethics often emphasize either content or the structural relationship between text and reader, and they tend to bracket pedagogy. This essay advocates instead for an approach that sees literary representation and readerly attention as interanimating and that considers teaching an important aspect of an ethics of reading. To support these positions, I turn to Katherena Vermette&#8217;s 2016 novel <i>The Break</i>, which both represents the urgent injustice of sexualized violence against Indigenous women and girls and also metafictionally comments on the ethics of witnessing. Describing how I read with my students the novel&#8217;s insistent thematization of face-to-face encounters and practices of attention as an invitation to read with Emmanuel Levinas and Simone Weil, I explicate the text&#8217;s self-aware commentary on <i>both</i> the need for readers to resist self-enlargement in their encounters with others&#8217; stories and also the danger of generalizing readerly responsibility or losing sight of the material realities the text represents. I source these challenges both in the novel and in my students&#8217; multiple particularities as readers facing the textual other. Ultimately, the essay argues for a more careful attention to which works we bring into our theorizing of literary ethics, and which theoretical frames we bring into classroom conversations.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/4/164ethicsattentionrepresentationresponsibilitydecolonialityindigenous writersgendered violencelevinasweilpedagogy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cynthia R. Wallace
spellingShingle Cynthia R. Wallace
Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading
Humanities
ethics
attention
representation
responsibility
decoloniality
indigenous writers
gendered violence
levinas
weil
pedagogy
author_facet Cynthia R. Wallace
author_sort Cynthia R. Wallace
title Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading
title_short Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading
title_full Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading
title_fullStr Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading
title_full_unstemmed Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading
title_sort attention, representation, and unsettlement in katherena vermette’s <i>the break</i>, or, teaching and (re)learning the ethics of reading
publisher MDPI AG
series Humanities
issn 2076-0787
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Theories of literary ethics often emphasize either content or the structural relationship between text and reader, and they tend to bracket pedagogy. This essay advocates instead for an approach that sees literary representation and readerly attention as interanimating and that considers teaching an important aspect of an ethics of reading. To support these positions, I turn to Katherena Vermette&#8217;s 2016 novel <i>The Break</i>, which both represents the urgent injustice of sexualized violence against Indigenous women and girls and also metafictionally comments on the ethics of witnessing. Describing how I read with my students the novel&#8217;s insistent thematization of face-to-face encounters and practices of attention as an invitation to read with Emmanuel Levinas and Simone Weil, I explicate the text&#8217;s self-aware commentary on <i>both</i> the need for readers to resist self-enlargement in their encounters with others&#8217; stories and also the danger of generalizing readerly responsibility or losing sight of the material realities the text represents. I source these challenges both in the novel and in my students&#8217; multiple particularities as readers facing the textual other. Ultimately, the essay argues for a more careful attention to which works we bring into our theorizing of literary ethics, and which theoretical frames we bring into classroom conversations.
topic ethics
attention
representation
responsibility
decoloniality
indigenous writers
gendered violence
levinas
weil
pedagogy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/4/164
work_keys_str_mv AT cynthiarwallace attentionrepresentationandunsettlementinkatherenavermettesithebreakiorteachingandrelearningtheethicsofreading
_version_ 1724977978226507776