Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading
Theories of literary ethics often emphasize either content or the structural relationship between text and reader, and they tend to bracket pedagogy. This essay advocates instead for an approach that sees literary representation and readerly attention as interanimating and that considers teaching an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Humanities |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/4/164 |
id |
doaj-4c7f6657e97249e2948a1bebfee75f00 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4c7f6657e97249e2948a1bebfee75f002020-11-25T01:56:45ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872019-10-018416410.3390/h8040164h8040164Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of ReadingCynthia R. Wallace0Department of English, St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W6, CanadaTheories of literary ethics often emphasize either content or the structural relationship between text and reader, and they tend to bracket pedagogy. This essay advocates instead for an approach that sees literary representation and readerly attention as interanimating and that considers teaching an important aspect of an ethics of reading. To support these positions, I turn to Katherena Vermette’s 2016 novel <i>The Break</i>, which both represents the urgent injustice of sexualized violence against Indigenous women and girls and also metafictionally comments on the ethics of witnessing. Describing how I read with my students the novel’s insistent thematization of face-to-face encounters and practices of attention as an invitation to read with Emmanuel Levinas and Simone Weil, I explicate the text’s self-aware commentary on <i>both</i> the need for readers to resist self-enlargement in their encounters with others’ stories and also the danger of generalizing readerly responsibility or losing sight of the material realities the text represents. I source these challenges both in the novel and in my students’ multiple particularities as readers facing the textual other. Ultimately, the essay argues for a more careful attention to which works we bring into our theorizing of literary ethics, and which theoretical frames we bring into classroom conversations.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/4/164ethicsattentionrepresentationresponsibilitydecolonialityindigenous writersgendered violencelevinasweilpedagogy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cynthia R. Wallace |
spellingShingle |
Cynthia R. Wallace Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading Humanities ethics attention representation responsibility decoloniality indigenous writers gendered violence levinas weil pedagogy |
author_facet |
Cynthia R. Wallace |
author_sort |
Cynthia R. Wallace |
title |
Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading |
title_short |
Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading |
title_full |
Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading |
title_fullStr |
Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading |
title_full_unstemmed |
Attention, Representation, and Unsettlement in Katherena Vermette’s <i>The Break</i>, or, Teaching and (Re)Learning the Ethics of Reading |
title_sort |
attention, representation, and unsettlement in katherena vermette’s <i>the break</i>, or, teaching and (re)learning the ethics of reading |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Humanities |
issn |
2076-0787 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Theories of literary ethics often emphasize either content or the structural relationship between text and reader, and they tend to bracket pedagogy. This essay advocates instead for an approach that sees literary representation and readerly attention as interanimating and that considers teaching an important aspect of an ethics of reading. To support these positions, I turn to Katherena Vermette’s 2016 novel <i>The Break</i>, which both represents the urgent injustice of sexualized violence against Indigenous women and girls and also metafictionally comments on the ethics of witnessing. Describing how I read with my students the novel’s insistent thematization of face-to-face encounters and practices of attention as an invitation to read with Emmanuel Levinas and Simone Weil, I explicate the text’s self-aware commentary on <i>both</i> the need for readers to resist self-enlargement in their encounters with others’ stories and also the danger of generalizing readerly responsibility or losing sight of the material realities the text represents. I source these challenges both in the novel and in my students’ multiple particularities as readers facing the textual other. Ultimately, the essay argues for a more careful attention to which works we bring into our theorizing of literary ethics, and which theoretical frames we bring into classroom conversations. |
topic |
ethics attention representation responsibility decoloniality indigenous writers gendered violence levinas weil pedagogy |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/8/4/164 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cynthiarwallace attentionrepresentationandunsettlementinkatherenavermettesithebreakiorteachingandrelearningtheethicsofreading |
_version_ |
1724977978226507776 |