The Emergence of Groups and Inequality through Co-Adaptation.

The emergence of groups and of inequality is often traced to pre-existing differences, exclusionary practices, or resource accumulation processes, but can the emergence of groups and their differential success simply be a feature of the behaviors of a priori equally-capable actors who have mutually...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jon Atwell, Robert Savit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4928893?pdf=render
id doaj-4c761fb0dbc340c787709a033c963bfc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c761fb0dbc340c787709a033c963bfc2020-11-24T20:45:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015814410.1371/journal.pone.0158144The Emergence of Groups and Inequality through Co-Adaptation.Jon AtwellRobert SavitThe emergence of groups and of inequality is often traced to pre-existing differences, exclusionary practices, or resource accumulation processes, but can the emergence of groups and their differential success simply be a feature of the behaviors of a priori equally-capable actors who have mutually adapted? Using a simple model of behavioral co-adaptation among agents whose individual actions construct a common environment, we present evidence that the formation of unequal groups is endemic to co-adaptive processes that endogenously alter the environment; agents tend to separate into two groups, one whose members stop adapting earliest (the in-group), and another comprising agents who continue to adapt (the out-group). Over a wide range of model parameters, members of the in-group are rewarded more on average than members of the out-group. The primary reason is that the in-group is able to have a more profound influence on the environment and mold it to the benefit of its members. This molding capacity proves more beneficial than the persistence of adaptivity, yet, crucially, which agents are able to form a coalition to successfully exert this control is strongly contingent on random aspects of the set of agent behaviors. In this paper, we present the model, relevant definitions, and results. We then discuss its implications for the study of complex adaptive systems generally.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4928893?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jon Atwell
Robert Savit
spellingShingle Jon Atwell
Robert Savit
The Emergence of Groups and Inequality through Co-Adaptation.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jon Atwell
Robert Savit
author_sort Jon Atwell
title The Emergence of Groups and Inequality through Co-Adaptation.
title_short The Emergence of Groups and Inequality through Co-Adaptation.
title_full The Emergence of Groups and Inequality through Co-Adaptation.
title_fullStr The Emergence of Groups and Inequality through Co-Adaptation.
title_full_unstemmed The Emergence of Groups and Inequality through Co-Adaptation.
title_sort emergence of groups and inequality through co-adaptation.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The emergence of groups and of inequality is often traced to pre-existing differences, exclusionary practices, or resource accumulation processes, but can the emergence of groups and their differential success simply be a feature of the behaviors of a priori equally-capable actors who have mutually adapted? Using a simple model of behavioral co-adaptation among agents whose individual actions construct a common environment, we present evidence that the formation of unequal groups is endemic to co-adaptive processes that endogenously alter the environment; agents tend to separate into two groups, one whose members stop adapting earliest (the in-group), and another comprising agents who continue to adapt (the out-group). Over a wide range of model parameters, members of the in-group are rewarded more on average than members of the out-group. The primary reason is that the in-group is able to have a more profound influence on the environment and mold it to the benefit of its members. This molding capacity proves more beneficial than the persistence of adaptivity, yet, crucially, which agents are able to form a coalition to successfully exert this control is strongly contingent on random aspects of the set of agent behaviors. In this paper, we present the model, relevant definitions, and results. We then discuss its implications for the study of complex adaptive systems generally.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4928893?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jonatwell theemergenceofgroupsandinequalitythroughcoadaptation
AT robertsavit theemergenceofgroupsandinequalitythroughcoadaptation
AT jonatwell emergenceofgroupsandinequalitythroughcoadaptation
AT robertsavit emergenceofgroupsandinequalitythroughcoadaptation
_version_ 1716813510747357184