Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage

Abstract Background To evaluate the performance of computed tomography (CT) as a diagnostic aid to differentiate between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst (ROCLC) and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage (REPWH). Methods A total of 36 patients treated at our hospitals for ROCLC and REPWH fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaohong Liu, Litao Song, Jian Wang, Qin Liu, Yingna Liu, Xin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Ovarian Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-017-0374-8
id doaj-4c63e3615a0349d39f9f7966d1bceec3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c63e3615a0349d39f9f7966d1bceec32020-11-24T21:55:13ZengBMCJournal of Ovarian Research1757-22152018-01-011111810.1186/s13048-017-0374-8Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhageXiaohong Liu0Litao Song1Jian Wang2Qin Liu3Yingna Liu4Xin Zhang5Department of Radiology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of TCMDepartment of Radiology, Seventh People’s Hospital affiliated with Shanghai University of TCMDepartment of Radiology, Changhai HospitalDepartment of Gynecology, Seventh People’s Hospital affiliated with Shanghai University of TCMDepartment of Radiology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital affiliated with ZhengZhou UniversityDepartment of Radiology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital affiliated with ZhengZhou UniversityAbstract Background To evaluate the performance of computed tomography (CT) as a diagnostic aid to differentiate between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst (ROCLC) and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage (REPWH). Methods A total of 36 patients treated at our hospitals for ROCLC and REPWH from June 2014 to August 2017 were included in this study. Based on the diagnosis, the study population was divided into ROCLC group (n = 21) and REPWH group (n = 15). CT scans were performed for all patients prior to treatment. The size of the cystic shadows and the depth of the pelvic effusion were analyzed and compared with independent sample Student’s t test and Fisher’s exact test. Results Cystic shadows with maximum diameters ≥3.0 cm presented in 16 patients with ROCLC and 1 patient with REPWH, while 4 patients with ROCLC and 9 patients with REPWH exhibited cystic shadows with maximum diameters <3.0 cm. The mean diameters along the major and minor axes in the two groups were 3.76 ± 1.11 cm and 2.93 ± 0.98 cm, 1.96 ± 0.65 cm and 1.60 ± 0.55 cm, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean depth of the pelvic effusion in patients with ROCLC and REPWH were 5.20 ± 2.47 cm and 6.96 ± 2.07 cm, respectively (p = 0.038). Conclusion The cystic shadow of ROCLC is larger than that of the REPWH. The depth of the pelvic effusion of REPWH is deeper than that of the ROCLC. CT can help differentiate between ROCLC and REPWH based on the size of the cystic shadow and the depth of pelvic effusion in the adnexal area.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-017-0374-8Ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst (ROCLC)Ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage (REPWH)Computed tomography (CT)Cyst shadowPelvic effusion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaohong Liu
Litao Song
Jian Wang
Qin Liu
Yingna Liu
Xin Zhang
spellingShingle Xiaohong Liu
Litao Song
Jian Wang
Qin Liu
Yingna Liu
Xin Zhang
Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage
Journal of Ovarian Research
Ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst (ROCLC)
Ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage (REPWH)
Computed tomography (CT)
Cyst shadow
Pelvic effusion
author_facet Xiaohong Liu
Litao Song
Jian Wang
Qin Liu
Yingna Liu
Xin Zhang
author_sort Xiaohong Liu
title Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage
title_short Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage
title_full Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage
title_fullStr Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic utility of CT in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage
title_sort diagnostic utility of ct in differentiating between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage
publisher BMC
series Journal of Ovarian Research
issn 1757-2215
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Abstract Background To evaluate the performance of computed tomography (CT) as a diagnostic aid to differentiate between ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst (ROCLC) and ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage (REPWH). Methods A total of 36 patients treated at our hospitals for ROCLC and REPWH from June 2014 to August 2017 were included in this study. Based on the diagnosis, the study population was divided into ROCLC group (n = 21) and REPWH group (n = 15). CT scans were performed for all patients prior to treatment. The size of the cystic shadows and the depth of the pelvic effusion were analyzed and compared with independent sample Student’s t test and Fisher’s exact test. Results Cystic shadows with maximum diameters ≥3.0 cm presented in 16 patients with ROCLC and 1 patient with REPWH, while 4 patients with ROCLC and 9 patients with REPWH exhibited cystic shadows with maximum diameters <3.0 cm. The mean diameters along the major and minor axes in the two groups were 3.76 ± 1.11 cm and 2.93 ± 0.98 cm, 1.96 ± 0.65 cm and 1.60 ± 0.55 cm, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean depth of the pelvic effusion in patients with ROCLC and REPWH were 5.20 ± 2.47 cm and 6.96 ± 2.07 cm, respectively (p = 0.038). Conclusion The cystic shadow of ROCLC is larger than that of the REPWH. The depth of the pelvic effusion of REPWH is deeper than that of the ROCLC. CT can help differentiate between ROCLC and REPWH based on the size of the cystic shadow and the depth of pelvic effusion in the adnexal area.
topic Ruptured ovarian corpus luteal cyst (ROCLC)
Ruptured ectopic pregnancy with hemorrhage (REPWH)
Computed tomography (CT)
Cyst shadow
Pelvic effusion
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-017-0374-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaohongliu diagnosticutilityofctindifferentiatingbetweenrupturedovariancorpuslutealcystandrupturedectopicpregnancywithhemorrhage
AT litaosong diagnosticutilityofctindifferentiatingbetweenrupturedovariancorpuslutealcystandrupturedectopicpregnancywithhemorrhage
AT jianwang diagnosticutilityofctindifferentiatingbetweenrupturedovariancorpuslutealcystandrupturedectopicpregnancywithhemorrhage
AT qinliu diagnosticutilityofctindifferentiatingbetweenrupturedovariancorpuslutealcystandrupturedectopicpregnancywithhemorrhage
AT yingnaliu diagnosticutilityofctindifferentiatingbetweenrupturedovariancorpuslutealcystandrupturedectopicpregnancywithhemorrhage
AT xinzhang diagnosticutilityofctindifferentiatingbetweenrupturedovariancorpuslutealcystandrupturedectopicpregnancywithhemorrhage
_version_ 1725863939713007616