Domesticating Cancer: An Evolutionary Strategy in the War on Cancer

Since cancer shares the same molecular machinery as the host, most therapeutic interventions that aim to target cancer would inadvertently also adversely affect the host. In addition, cancer continuously evolves, streamlining its host-derived genome for a new single-celled existence. In particular,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gustav van Niekerk, Theo Nell, Anna-Mart Engelbrecht
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2017.00304/full
id doaj-4c5c9bbe5abf4680acddbc01ad0a9ed6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c5c9bbe5abf4680acddbc01ad0a9ed62020-11-24T22:27:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2017-12-01710.3389/fonc.2017.00304278617Domesticating Cancer: An Evolutionary Strategy in the War on CancerGustav van Niekerk0Theo Nell1Anna-Mart Engelbrecht2Department of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South AfricaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South AfricaDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South AfricaSince cancer shares the same molecular machinery as the host, most therapeutic interventions that aim to target cancer would inadvertently also adversely affect the host. In addition, cancer continuously evolves, streamlining its host-derived genome for a new single-celled existence. In particular, short-term clinical success observed with most antineoplastic therapies directly relate to the fact that cancer is constantly evolving. However, the clonal evolution of cancer occasionally also render cancer cells uniquely susceptible to therapeutic interventions, as is exemplified by the clinical relevance of synthetic lethality. Synthetic lethality describes a situation where the simultaneous loss of function in two genes results in lethality, but where a loss of function in either single gene is tolerated. This observation suggests that the evolution of cancer, usually seen as a major clinical challenge, may also afford a key opportunity in lowering on-target toxicities accosted with chemotherapy. As an example, by subjecting cancer to specific selection regimes, cancer can in effect be placed on evolutionary trajectories leading to the development of “targetable” phenotypes such as synthetic lethal interactions. However, such a selection regime would have to overcome a range of obstacles such as on-target toxicity and the selection of an evolvable trait. Since the majority of cancer evolution manifests as a loss of function, we suggest that the induction of auxotrophic phenotypes (i.e., where an organism lose the ability to synthesize specific organic compounds required for growth and thus become dependent on it from dietary sources) may represent an attractive therapeutic option. As an example, animals can obtain vitamin C either by de novo synthesis or from their diet. However, since the maintenance of synthetic pathways is costly, such pathways are often lost if no longer necessary, resulting in the organism being auxotrophic toward the dietary compound. Similarly, increasing the maintenance cost of a redundant pathway in cancer cells is likely to select for clones that have lost such a redundant pathway. Inhibition of a pathway, while supporting the activity of a compensating pathway, may thus induce auxotrophism in cancer cells but not in genomic stable host cells.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2017.00304/fullsynthetic lethalityauxotrophycancerevolutionchemoresistance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gustav van Niekerk
Theo Nell
Anna-Mart Engelbrecht
spellingShingle Gustav van Niekerk
Theo Nell
Anna-Mart Engelbrecht
Domesticating Cancer: An Evolutionary Strategy in the War on Cancer
Frontiers in Oncology
synthetic lethality
auxotrophy
cancer
evolution
chemoresistance
author_facet Gustav van Niekerk
Theo Nell
Anna-Mart Engelbrecht
author_sort Gustav van Niekerk
title Domesticating Cancer: An Evolutionary Strategy in the War on Cancer
title_short Domesticating Cancer: An Evolutionary Strategy in the War on Cancer
title_full Domesticating Cancer: An Evolutionary Strategy in the War on Cancer
title_fullStr Domesticating Cancer: An Evolutionary Strategy in the War on Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Domesticating Cancer: An Evolutionary Strategy in the War on Cancer
title_sort domesticating cancer: an evolutionary strategy in the war on cancer
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Since cancer shares the same molecular machinery as the host, most therapeutic interventions that aim to target cancer would inadvertently also adversely affect the host. In addition, cancer continuously evolves, streamlining its host-derived genome for a new single-celled existence. In particular, short-term clinical success observed with most antineoplastic therapies directly relate to the fact that cancer is constantly evolving. However, the clonal evolution of cancer occasionally also render cancer cells uniquely susceptible to therapeutic interventions, as is exemplified by the clinical relevance of synthetic lethality. Synthetic lethality describes a situation where the simultaneous loss of function in two genes results in lethality, but where a loss of function in either single gene is tolerated. This observation suggests that the evolution of cancer, usually seen as a major clinical challenge, may also afford a key opportunity in lowering on-target toxicities accosted with chemotherapy. As an example, by subjecting cancer to specific selection regimes, cancer can in effect be placed on evolutionary trajectories leading to the development of “targetable” phenotypes such as synthetic lethal interactions. However, such a selection regime would have to overcome a range of obstacles such as on-target toxicity and the selection of an evolvable trait. Since the majority of cancer evolution manifests as a loss of function, we suggest that the induction of auxotrophic phenotypes (i.e., where an organism lose the ability to synthesize specific organic compounds required for growth and thus become dependent on it from dietary sources) may represent an attractive therapeutic option. As an example, animals can obtain vitamin C either by de novo synthesis or from their diet. However, since the maintenance of synthetic pathways is costly, such pathways are often lost if no longer necessary, resulting in the organism being auxotrophic toward the dietary compound. Similarly, increasing the maintenance cost of a redundant pathway in cancer cells is likely to select for clones that have lost such a redundant pathway. Inhibition of a pathway, while supporting the activity of a compensating pathway, may thus induce auxotrophism in cancer cells but not in genomic stable host cells.
topic synthetic lethality
auxotrophy
cancer
evolution
chemoresistance
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2017.00304/full
work_keys_str_mv AT gustavvanniekerk domesticatingcanceranevolutionarystrategyinthewaroncancer
AT theonell domesticatingcanceranevolutionarystrategyinthewaroncancer
AT annamartengelbrecht domesticatingcanceranevolutionarystrategyinthewaroncancer
_version_ 1725749604269424640