A comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of lactated ringer (LR), vasopressin (Vaso) or terlipressin (Terli) on uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UHS) in rats. METHODS: 48 rats were divided into four treatment groups for UHS study. Vaso group was given bolus vasopressin (0.8 U/kg); the Terl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chien-Chang Lee, Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee, Shy-Shin Chang, Si-Huei Lee, Yu-Chi Huang, Chia-Hung Yo, Shih-Hao Lee, Shyr-Chyr Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997410?pdf=render
id doaj-4c5b662fa0824f99a0f008819e01e225
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c5b662fa0824f99a0f008819e01e2252020-11-25T01:09:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9582110.1371/journal.pone.0095821A comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.Chien-Chang LeeMeng-Tse Gabriel LeeShy-Shin ChangSi-Huei LeeYu-Chi HuangChia-Hung YoShih-Hao LeeShyr-Chyr ChenAIM: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of lactated ringer (LR), vasopressin (Vaso) or terlipressin (Terli) on uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UHS) in rats. METHODS: 48 rats were divided into four treatment groups for UHS study. Vaso group was given bolus vasopressin (0.8 U/kg); the Terli group was given bolus terlipressin (15 mcg/kg); LR group was given LR and the sham group was not given anything. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum lactate level, plasma cytokine levels, lung injury and mortality are investigated for these different treatment groups. RESULTS: Compared with LR group, vasopressin and terlipressin-treated groups were associated with higher MAP, lowered mortality rates, less lung injury, lowered serum lactate level, less proinflammatory and more anti-inflammatory cytokine production at certain time points. Comparing between vasopressin and terlipressin treated groups, there is no statistical difference in mortality rates, lung injury, serum lactate level and cytokine level. However, there is a difference in the length of time in maintaining a restored level of MAP (80 to 110 mmHg). The terlipressin treated rats can maintain this restored level of MAP for 45 minutes, but the vasopressin treated rats can only maintain this restored level of MAP for 5 minutes before decreasing gradually to the MAP observed in LR group (40 mmHg). CONCLUSION: Early optimization of hemodynamics with terlipressin or vasopressin in an animal model of UHS was associated with improved hemodynamics and inflammatory cytokine profile than the LR control. Compared with vasopressin, terlipressin has the advantage of ease of use and sustained effects.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997410?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chien-Chang Lee
Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee
Shy-Shin Chang
Si-Huei Lee
Yu-Chi Huang
Chia-Hung Yo
Shih-Hao Lee
Shyr-Chyr Chen
spellingShingle Chien-Chang Lee
Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee
Shy-Shin Chang
Si-Huei Lee
Yu-Chi Huang
Chia-Hung Yo
Shih-Hao Lee
Shyr-Chyr Chen
A comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Chien-Chang Lee
Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee
Shy-Shin Chang
Si-Huei Lee
Yu-Chi Huang
Chia-Hung Yo
Shih-Hao Lee
Shyr-Chyr Chen
author_sort Chien-Chang Lee
title A comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.
title_short A comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.
title_full A comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.
title_fullStr A comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.
title_sort comparison of vasopressin, terlipressin, and lactated ringers for resuscitation of uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock in an animal model.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of lactated ringer (LR), vasopressin (Vaso) or terlipressin (Terli) on uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock (UHS) in rats. METHODS: 48 rats were divided into four treatment groups for UHS study. Vaso group was given bolus vasopressin (0.8 U/kg); the Terli group was given bolus terlipressin (15 mcg/kg); LR group was given LR and the sham group was not given anything. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum lactate level, plasma cytokine levels, lung injury and mortality are investigated for these different treatment groups. RESULTS: Compared with LR group, vasopressin and terlipressin-treated groups were associated with higher MAP, lowered mortality rates, less lung injury, lowered serum lactate level, less proinflammatory and more anti-inflammatory cytokine production at certain time points. Comparing between vasopressin and terlipressin treated groups, there is no statistical difference in mortality rates, lung injury, serum lactate level and cytokine level. However, there is a difference in the length of time in maintaining a restored level of MAP (80 to 110 mmHg). The terlipressin treated rats can maintain this restored level of MAP for 45 minutes, but the vasopressin treated rats can only maintain this restored level of MAP for 5 minutes before decreasing gradually to the MAP observed in LR group (40 mmHg). CONCLUSION: Early optimization of hemodynamics with terlipressin or vasopressin in an animal model of UHS was associated with improved hemodynamics and inflammatory cytokine profile than the LR control. Compared with vasopressin, terlipressin has the advantage of ease of use and sustained effects.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997410?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT chienchanglee acomparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT mengtsegabriellee acomparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT shyshinchang acomparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT sihueilee acomparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT yuchihuang acomparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT chiahungyo acomparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT shihhaolee acomparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT shyrchyrchen acomparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT chienchanglee comparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT mengtsegabriellee comparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT shyshinchang comparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT sihueilee comparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT yuchihuang comparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT chiahungyo comparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT shihhaolee comparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
AT shyrchyrchen comparisonofvasopressinterlipressinandlactatedringersforresuscitationofuncontrolledhemorrhagicshockinananimalmodel
_version_ 1725178359269294080