Balancing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Democracy in organizing Inter-Municipal Partnerships: Conflicting aims?

<p>The balancing of efficiency, effectiveness and democratic control is an ever-recurring problem when designing governance structures more or less disconnected from the formal democratic institutions. As far as the relationship between these considerations is concerned, much of the th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ole Johan Andersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Gothenburg 2012-01-01
Series:Offentlig Förvaltning: Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration
Online Access:http://ojs.ub.gu.se/ojs/index.php/sjpa/article/view/967
id doaj-4c57aa347a8b4d33a3fa2803912e88ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c57aa347a8b4d33a3fa2803912e88ef2020-11-24T20:47:33ZengUniversity of GothenburgOffentlig Förvaltning: Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration2000-80582001-33102012-01-011522546Balancing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Democracy in organizing Inter-Municipal Partnerships: Conflicting aims?Ole Johan Andersen<p>The balancing of efficiency, effectiveness and democratic control is an ever-recurring problem when designing governance structures more or less disconnected from the formal democratic institutions. As far as the relationship between these considerations is concerned, much of the theoretical as well as the practical discourse revolve around the issue of whether synergy emerges or whether there is just a matter of trade-off. By applying primarily empirical observations from local-to-local cooperation in some Norwegian regions the article attempts to investigate how the relationship turns out.</p> <p>The article argues that at least three models are available, <em>one balanced and two imbalanced variants</em>. The notion of synergy highlights a model in which input-processes of democratic participation and output-processes of performance reinforce each other. The others, on the contrary, are imbalanced, implying either a <em>democratic deficit</em> or a <em>deliberative surplus</em>.</p> <p>By comparing the models to experiences from local-to-local cooperation a pattern of divergent features emerges. Nevertheless, a trade-off where the regard for local democracy and autonomy seems to dominate at the sacrifice of performing efficiently and effectively, thus the article is rather pessimistic as to what may be gained by pursuing the intermunicipal cooperative strategy further.</p>http://ojs.ub.gu.se/ojs/index.php/sjpa/article/view/967
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ole Johan Andersen
spellingShingle Ole Johan Andersen
Balancing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Democracy in organizing Inter-Municipal Partnerships: Conflicting aims?
Offentlig Förvaltning: Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration
author_facet Ole Johan Andersen
author_sort Ole Johan Andersen
title Balancing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Democracy in organizing Inter-Municipal Partnerships: Conflicting aims?
title_short Balancing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Democracy in organizing Inter-Municipal Partnerships: Conflicting aims?
title_full Balancing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Democracy in organizing Inter-Municipal Partnerships: Conflicting aims?
title_fullStr Balancing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Democracy in organizing Inter-Municipal Partnerships: Conflicting aims?
title_full_unstemmed Balancing Efficiency, Effectiveness and Democracy in organizing Inter-Municipal Partnerships: Conflicting aims?
title_sort balancing efficiency, effectiveness and democracy in organizing inter-municipal partnerships: conflicting aims?
publisher University of Gothenburg
series Offentlig Förvaltning: Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration
issn 2000-8058
2001-3310
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <p>The balancing of efficiency, effectiveness and democratic control is an ever-recurring problem when designing governance structures more or less disconnected from the formal democratic institutions. As far as the relationship between these considerations is concerned, much of the theoretical as well as the practical discourse revolve around the issue of whether synergy emerges or whether there is just a matter of trade-off. By applying primarily empirical observations from local-to-local cooperation in some Norwegian regions the article attempts to investigate how the relationship turns out.</p> <p>The article argues that at least three models are available, <em>one balanced and two imbalanced variants</em>. The notion of synergy highlights a model in which input-processes of democratic participation and output-processes of performance reinforce each other. The others, on the contrary, are imbalanced, implying either a <em>democratic deficit</em> or a <em>deliberative surplus</em>.</p> <p>By comparing the models to experiences from local-to-local cooperation a pattern of divergent features emerges. Nevertheless, a trade-off where the regard for local democracy and autonomy seems to dominate at the sacrifice of performing efficiently and effectively, thus the article is rather pessimistic as to what may be gained by pursuing the intermunicipal cooperative strategy further.</p>
url http://ojs.ub.gu.se/ojs/index.php/sjpa/article/view/967
work_keys_str_mv AT olejohanandersen balancingefficiencyeffectivenessanddemocracyinorganizingintermunicipalpartnershipsconflictingaims
_version_ 1716809608228503552