The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016

This study traces appeals to authenticity, over time, in the promotional material of leading social-networking sites (SNSs). Using the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, the public-facing websites of major SNS platforms—beginning with Friendster in 2002—were sampled at six-month intervals, with pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meredith Salisbury, Jefferson D. Pooley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-01-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/1/10
id doaj-4c3b160aa8f24cccbfc8576f5074ce44
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c3b160aa8f24cccbfc8576f5074ce442020-11-24T23:03:26ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602017-01-01611010.3390/socsci6010010socsci6010010The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016Meredith Salisbury0Jefferson D. Pooley1Department of Media & Communication, Muhlenberg College, 2400 W. Chew St., Allentown, PA 18018, USADepartment of Media & Communication, Muhlenberg College, 2400 W. Chew St., Allentown, PA 18018, USAThis study traces appeals to authenticity, over time, in the promotional material of leading social-networking sites (SNSs). Using the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, the public-facing websites of major SNS platforms—beginning with Friendster in 2002—were sampled at six-month intervals, with promotional language and visuals examined for authenticity claims. The authors tracked these appeals, with attention to changes in promotional copy, through to July 2016, among the most popular social media services (as determined by English-language web presence and active monthly user figures or, when unavailable, reported network size). The study found that nearly all SNSs invoked authenticity—directly or through language like “real life” and “genuine”—in their promotional materials. What stood out was the profoundly reactive nature of these claims, with new services often defining themselves, openly or implicitly, against legacy services’ inauthenticity. A recurring marketing strategy, in other words, has been to call out competitors’ phoniness by substituting (and touting) some other, differently grounded mode of authenticity. Since the affordances of social sites, even those touting evanescence or anonymity, make them vulnerable to similar charges, the cycle gets replayed with numbing regularity.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/1/10authenticityFacebookselfSnapchatsocial mediasocial networkingsubjectivityTwitter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meredith Salisbury
Jefferson D. Pooley
spellingShingle Meredith Salisbury
Jefferson D. Pooley
The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016
Social Sciences
authenticity
Facebook
self
Snapchat
social media
social networking
subjectivity
Twitter
author_facet Meredith Salisbury
Jefferson D. Pooley
author_sort Meredith Salisbury
title The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016
title_short The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016
title_full The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016
title_fullStr The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016
title_full_unstemmed The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016
title_sort #nofilter self: the contest for authenticity among social networking sites, 2002–2016
publisher MDPI AG
series Social Sciences
issn 2076-0760
publishDate 2017-01-01
description This study traces appeals to authenticity, over time, in the promotional material of leading social-networking sites (SNSs). Using the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, the public-facing websites of major SNS platforms—beginning with Friendster in 2002—were sampled at six-month intervals, with promotional language and visuals examined for authenticity claims. The authors tracked these appeals, with attention to changes in promotional copy, through to July 2016, among the most popular social media services (as determined by English-language web presence and active monthly user figures or, when unavailable, reported network size). The study found that nearly all SNSs invoked authenticity—directly or through language like “real life” and “genuine”—in their promotional materials. What stood out was the profoundly reactive nature of these claims, with new services often defining themselves, openly or implicitly, against legacy services’ inauthenticity. A recurring marketing strategy, in other words, has been to call out competitors’ phoniness by substituting (and touting) some other, differently grounded mode of authenticity. Since the affordances of social sites, even those touting evanescence or anonymity, make them vulnerable to similar charges, the cycle gets replayed with numbing regularity.
topic authenticity
Facebook
self
Snapchat
social media
social networking
subjectivity
Twitter
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/1/10
work_keys_str_mv AT meredithsalisbury thenofilterselfthecontestforauthenticityamongsocialnetworkingsites20022016
AT jeffersondpooley thenofilterselfthecontestforauthenticityamongsocialnetworkingsites20022016
AT meredithsalisbury nofilterselfthecontestforauthenticityamongsocialnetworkingsites20022016
AT jeffersondpooley nofilterselfthecontestforauthenticityamongsocialnetworkingsites20022016
_version_ 1725633868042600448