Flexible Bus Route Optimization Scheduling Model

A flexible bus route optimization scheduling model that considers the dynamic changes of passenger demand is proposed to address the large difference in demand for flexible bus passengers and real-time variability. This model uses the heuristic algorithm based on gravity model to determine the follo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ji-yang Sun, Yan-yan Chen, Jian-ling Huang, Pan-yi Wei, Cheng-cheng Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816965
id doaj-4c2bffdb381848b5b21c1f644f833d4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c2bffdb381848b5b21c1f644f833d4c2021-03-08T02:00:34ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942021-01-01202110.1155/2021/8816965Flexible Bus Route Optimization Scheduling ModelJi-yang Sun0Yan-yan Chen1Jian-ling Huang2Pan-yi Wei3Cheng-cheng Song4Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic EngineeringCenter of Cooperative Innovation for Beijing Metropolitan TransportationBeijing Transportation Information CenterBeijing Key Laboratory of Traffic EngineeringBeijing Key Laboratory of Traffic EngineeringA flexible bus route optimization scheduling model that considers the dynamic changes of passenger demand is proposed to address the large difference in demand for flexible bus passengers and real-time variability. This model uses the heuristic algorithm based on gravity model to determine the following: passenger booking; vehicle passenger capacity; team known conditions such as size, according to the dynamic changes of passenger demand for real-time iterative update shuttle travel time; vehicle operating costs (vehicle); and time cost for passengers (passengers waiting time for the vehicle, actual time of arrival, and the difference between expected and actual times of arrival) before minimization as the target. Finally, the practicabilities of the model and algorithm are verified by an example. Analysis results show that for 102 travel demands of 15 randomly generated demand points, completing all services requires 17–21 vehicles with average travel time of 24.59 minutes each. The solution time of 100 groups of data is within 25 seconds and the average calculation time is 12.04 seconds. Under the premise of real-time adjustment of connection planning time, this optimization model can thus better meet the dynamic demand of passengers compared with the current scenario. The model effectively reduces the planning path error, shortens the travel distance and passenger travel time, and achieves better results than the flexible bus scheduling model that ignores changes of connection travel time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816965
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ji-yang Sun
Yan-yan Chen
Jian-ling Huang
Pan-yi Wei
Cheng-cheng Song
spellingShingle Ji-yang Sun
Yan-yan Chen
Jian-ling Huang
Pan-yi Wei
Cheng-cheng Song
Flexible Bus Route Optimization Scheduling Model
Advances in Civil Engineering
author_facet Ji-yang Sun
Yan-yan Chen
Jian-ling Huang
Pan-yi Wei
Cheng-cheng Song
author_sort Ji-yang Sun
title Flexible Bus Route Optimization Scheduling Model
title_short Flexible Bus Route Optimization Scheduling Model
title_full Flexible Bus Route Optimization Scheduling Model
title_fullStr Flexible Bus Route Optimization Scheduling Model
title_full_unstemmed Flexible Bus Route Optimization Scheduling Model
title_sort flexible bus route optimization scheduling model
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Civil Engineering
issn 1687-8094
publishDate 2021-01-01
description A flexible bus route optimization scheduling model that considers the dynamic changes of passenger demand is proposed to address the large difference in demand for flexible bus passengers and real-time variability. This model uses the heuristic algorithm based on gravity model to determine the following: passenger booking; vehicle passenger capacity; team known conditions such as size, according to the dynamic changes of passenger demand for real-time iterative update shuttle travel time; vehicle operating costs (vehicle); and time cost for passengers (passengers waiting time for the vehicle, actual time of arrival, and the difference between expected and actual times of arrival) before minimization as the target. Finally, the practicabilities of the model and algorithm are verified by an example. Analysis results show that for 102 travel demands of 15 randomly generated demand points, completing all services requires 17–21 vehicles with average travel time of 24.59 minutes each. The solution time of 100 groups of data is within 25 seconds and the average calculation time is 12.04 seconds. Under the premise of real-time adjustment of connection planning time, this optimization model can thus better meet the dynamic demand of passengers compared with the current scenario. The model effectively reduces the planning path error, shortens the travel distance and passenger travel time, and achieves better results than the flexible bus scheduling model that ignores changes of connection travel time.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816965
work_keys_str_mv AT jiyangsun flexiblebusrouteoptimizationschedulingmodel
AT yanyanchen flexiblebusrouteoptimizationschedulingmodel
AT jianlinghuang flexiblebusrouteoptimizationschedulingmodel
AT panyiwei flexiblebusrouteoptimizationschedulingmodel
AT chengchengsong flexiblebusrouteoptimizationschedulingmodel
_version_ 1714797356753354752