Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces

In this study we describe and compare eight different strategies to predict the depth variation of stress within a layered rock formation. This reveals the inherent uncertainties in stress prediction from elastic properties and stress measurements, as well as the geologic implications of the differe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. Roche, M. van der Baan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-04-01
Series:Solid Earth
Online Access:http://www.solid-earth.net/8/479/2017/se-8-479-2017.pdf
id doaj-4c14687b4a1546728c15d5aacaa8adc0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c14687b4a1546728c15d5aacaa8adc02020-11-25T01:59:25ZengCopernicus PublicationsSolid Earth1869-95101869-95292017-04-018247949810.5194/se-8-479-2017Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forcesV. Roche0M. van der Baan1School of Earth Sciences, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, IrelandDepartment of Physics, CCIS University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, T6G 2E1, CanadaIn this study we describe and compare eight different strategies to predict the depth variation of stress within a layered rock formation. This reveals the inherent uncertainties in stress prediction from elastic properties and stress measurements, as well as the geologic implications of the different models. The predictive strategies are based on well log data and in some cases on in situ stress measurements, combined with the weight of the overburden rock, the pore pressure, the depth variation in rock properties, and tectonic effects. We contrast and compare stresses predicted purely using theoretical models with those constrained by in situ measurements. We also explore the role of the applied boundary conditions that mimic two fundamental models of tectonic effects, namely the stress- or strain-driven models. In both models, layer-to-layer tectonic stress variations are added to initial predictions due to vertical variation in rock elasticity, consistent with natural observations, yet describe very different controlling mechanisms. Layer-to-layer stress variations are caused by either local elastic strain accommodation for the strain-driven model, or stress transfers for the stress-driven model. As a consequence, stress predictions can depend strongly on the implemented prediction philosophy and the underlying implicit and explicit assumptions, even for media with identical elastic parameters and stress measurements. This implies that stress predictions have large uncertainties, even if local measurements and boundary conditions are honored.http://www.solid-earth.net/8/479/2017/se-8-479-2017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author V. Roche
M. van der Baan
spellingShingle V. Roche
M. van der Baan
Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces
Solid Earth
author_facet V. Roche
M. van der Baan
author_sort V. Roche
title Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces
title_short Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces
title_full Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces
title_fullStr Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces
title_full_unstemmed Modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces
title_sort modeling of the in situ state of stress in elastic layered rock subject to stress and strain-driven tectonic forces
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Solid Earth
issn 1869-9510
1869-9529
publishDate 2017-04-01
description In this study we describe and compare eight different strategies to predict the depth variation of stress within a layered rock formation. This reveals the inherent uncertainties in stress prediction from elastic properties and stress measurements, as well as the geologic implications of the different models. The predictive strategies are based on well log data and in some cases on in situ stress measurements, combined with the weight of the overburden rock, the pore pressure, the depth variation in rock properties, and tectonic effects. We contrast and compare stresses predicted purely using theoretical models with those constrained by in situ measurements. We also explore the role of the applied boundary conditions that mimic two fundamental models of tectonic effects, namely the stress- or strain-driven models. In both models, layer-to-layer tectonic stress variations are added to initial predictions due to vertical variation in rock elasticity, consistent with natural observations, yet describe very different controlling mechanisms. Layer-to-layer stress variations are caused by either local elastic strain accommodation for the strain-driven model, or stress transfers for the stress-driven model. As a consequence, stress predictions can depend strongly on the implemented prediction philosophy and the underlying implicit and explicit assumptions, even for media with identical elastic parameters and stress measurements. This implies that stress predictions have large uncertainties, even if local measurements and boundary conditions are honored.
url http://www.solid-earth.net/8/479/2017/se-8-479-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vroche modelingoftheinsitustateofstressinelasticlayeredrocksubjecttostressandstraindriventectonicforces
AT mvanderbaan modelingoftheinsitustateofstressinelasticlayeredrocksubjecttostressandstraindriventectonicforces
_version_ 1724964648737832960