Which is better for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Side-by-side versus stent-in-stent?
Biliary drainage is required for the management of unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (UMHBO), and endoscopic transpapillary drainage is the first-line therapy because it is less invasive. Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are superior to plastic stents because they have longer s...
Main Authors: | Itaru Naitoh, Tadahisa Inoue, Kazuki Hayashi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society of Gastrointestinal Intervention
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Gastrointestinal Intervention |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.18528/gii180014 |
Similar Items
-
Unilateral versus Bilateral Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage and Subsequent Metal Stent Placement for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
by: Ryunosuke Hakuta, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic biliary stenting do not affect the sensitivity of transpapillary forceps biopsy for the diagnosis of bile duct adenocarcinoma
by: Aoki, T., et al.
Published: (2022) -
Sirolimus may be associated with early recurrence of biliary obstruction in liver transplant patients undergoing endoscopic stenting of biliary strictures
by: James H. Tabibian, MD., et al.
Published: (2011-07-01) -
Histopathological examination following side-by-side placement of metal stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction
by: Hiroshi Nakagawara, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Sigmoid Perforation by a Migrated Plastic Biliary Stent
by: Pedro Marcos, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)