Numerals under negation: Empirical findings
Despite a vast literature on the semantics and pragmatics of cardinal numerals, it has gone largely unnoticed that they exhibit a variety of polarity sensitivity, in that they require contextual support to occur felicitously in the scope of sentential negation. We present the results of a corpus ana...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/736 |
id |
doaj-4c0933b8b9fd41fbb6f58fc67f505ffe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4c0933b8b9fd41fbb6f58fc67f505ffe2021-09-02T08:06:21ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352019-10-014110.5334/gjgl.736420Numerals under negation: Empirical findingsStephanie Solt0Brandon Waldon1Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS), BerlinStanford University, Department of Linguistics, Stanford, CADespite a vast literature on the semantics and pragmatics of cardinal numerals, it has gone largely unnoticed that they exhibit a variety of polarity sensitivity, in that they require contextual support to occur felicitously in the scope of sentential negation. We present the results of a corpus analysis and two experiments that demonstrate that negated cardinals are acceptable when the negated value has been asserted or otherwise explicitly mentioned in the preceding discourse context, but unacceptable when such a value is neither mentioned nor inferable from that context. In this, bare cardinals exhibit both similarities to and differences from other types of numerical expressions. We propose an account of our findings based on the notion of convexity of linguistic meanings (Gärdenfors 2004) and discuss the implications for the semantics of numerical expressions more generally.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/736negationpolaritynumeralapproximationdiscourseconvexity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stephanie Solt Brandon Waldon |
spellingShingle |
Stephanie Solt Brandon Waldon Numerals under negation: Empirical findings Glossa negation polarity numeral approximation discourse convexity |
author_facet |
Stephanie Solt Brandon Waldon |
author_sort |
Stephanie Solt |
title |
Numerals under negation: Empirical findings |
title_short |
Numerals under negation: Empirical findings |
title_full |
Numerals under negation: Empirical findings |
title_fullStr |
Numerals under negation: Empirical findings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Numerals under negation: Empirical findings |
title_sort |
numerals under negation: empirical findings |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Despite a vast literature on the semantics and pragmatics of cardinal numerals, it has gone largely unnoticed that they exhibit a variety of polarity sensitivity, in that they require contextual support to occur felicitously in the scope of sentential negation. We present the results of a corpus analysis and two experiments that demonstrate that negated cardinals are acceptable when the negated value has been asserted or otherwise explicitly mentioned in the preceding discourse context, but unacceptable when such a value is neither mentioned nor inferable from that context. In this, bare cardinals exhibit both similarities to and differences from other types of numerical expressions. We propose an account of our findings based on the notion of convexity of linguistic meanings (Gärdenfors 2004) and discuss the implications for the semantics of numerical expressions more generally. |
topic |
negation polarity numeral approximation discourse convexity |
url |
https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/736 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephaniesolt numeralsundernegationempiricalfindings AT brandonwaldon numeralsundernegationempiricalfindings |
_version_ |
1721177961691873280 |