Numerals under negation: Empirical findings

Despite a vast literature on the semantics and pragmatics of cardinal numerals, it has gone largely unnoticed that they exhibit a variety of polarity sensitivity, in that they require contextual support to occur felicitously in the scope of sentential negation. We present the results of a corpus ana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie Solt, Brandon Waldon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2019-10-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/736
id doaj-4c0933b8b9fd41fbb6f58fc67f505ffe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c0933b8b9fd41fbb6f58fc67f505ffe2021-09-02T08:06:21ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352019-10-014110.5334/gjgl.736420Numerals under negation: Empirical findingsStephanie Solt0Brandon Waldon1Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft (ZAS), BerlinStanford University, Department of Linguistics, Stanford, CADespite a vast literature on the semantics and pragmatics of cardinal numerals, it has gone largely unnoticed that they exhibit a variety of polarity sensitivity, in that they require contextual support to occur felicitously in the scope of sentential negation. We present the results of a corpus analysis and two experiments that demonstrate that negated cardinals are acceptable when the negated value has been asserted or otherwise explicitly mentioned in the preceding discourse context, but unacceptable when such a value is neither mentioned nor inferable from that context. In this, bare cardinals exhibit both similarities to and differences from other types of numerical expressions. We propose an account of our findings based on the notion of convexity of linguistic meanings (Gärdenfors 2004) and discuss the implications for the semantics of numerical expressions more generally.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/736negationpolaritynumeralapproximationdiscourseconvexity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie Solt
Brandon Waldon
spellingShingle Stephanie Solt
Brandon Waldon
Numerals under negation: Empirical findings
Glossa
negation
polarity
numeral
approximation
discourse
convexity
author_facet Stephanie Solt
Brandon Waldon
author_sort Stephanie Solt
title Numerals under negation: Empirical findings
title_short Numerals under negation: Empirical findings
title_full Numerals under negation: Empirical findings
title_fullStr Numerals under negation: Empirical findings
title_full_unstemmed Numerals under negation: Empirical findings
title_sort numerals under negation: empirical findings
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Despite a vast literature on the semantics and pragmatics of cardinal numerals, it has gone largely unnoticed that they exhibit a variety of polarity sensitivity, in that they require contextual support to occur felicitously in the scope of sentential negation. We present the results of a corpus analysis and two experiments that demonstrate that negated cardinals are acceptable when the negated value has been asserted or otherwise explicitly mentioned in the preceding discourse context, but unacceptable when such a value is neither mentioned nor inferable from that context. In this, bare cardinals exhibit both similarities to and differences from other types of numerical expressions. We propose an account of our findings based on the notion of convexity of linguistic meanings (Gärdenfors 2004) and discuss the implications for the semantics of numerical expressions more generally.
topic negation
polarity
numeral
approximation
discourse
convexity
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/736
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniesolt numeralsundernegationempiricalfindings
AT brandonwaldon numeralsundernegationempiricalfindings
_version_ 1721177961691873280