Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table
Languages vary in their semantic partitioning of the world. This has led to speculation that language might shape basic cognitive processes. Spatial cognition has been an area of research in which linguistic relativity – the effect of language on thought – has both been proposed and rejected. Prior...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
New Prairie Press
2015-12-01
|
Series: | The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=biyclc |
id |
doaj-4c08200f58944b7fbae6ea2b3179c537 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4c08200f58944b7fbae6ea2b3179c5372021-06-30T19:33:17ZengNew Prairie PressThe Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication1944-36762015-12-011010.4148/1944-3676.1100 Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the tableNorbert Ross 0Jeffrey T. Shenton 1Werner Hertzog 2Mike Kohut 3Vanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt UniversityLanguages vary in their semantic partitioning of the world. This has led to speculation that language might shape basic cognitive processes. Spatial cognition has been an area of research in which linguistic relativity – the effect of language on thought – has both been proposed and rejected. Prior studies have been inconclusive, lacking experimental rigor or appropriate research design. Lacking detailed ethnographic knowledge as well as failing to pay attention to intralanguage variations, these studies often fall short of defining an appropriate concept of language, culture, and cognition. Our study constitutes the first research exploring (1) individuals speaking different languages yet living (for generations) in the same immediate environment and (2) systematic intralanguage variation. Results show that language does not shape spatial cognition and plays at best the secondary role of foregrounding alternative possibilities for encoding spatial arrangements.http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=biyclcLinguistic Relativity HypothesisCultureLanguage and CognitionLanguage and Spatial Cognition |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Norbert Ross Jeffrey T. Shenton Werner Hertzog Mike Kohut |
spellingShingle |
Norbert Ross Jeffrey T. Shenton Werner Hertzog Mike Kohut Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis Culture Language and Cognition Language and Spatial Cognition |
author_facet |
Norbert Ross Jeffrey T. Shenton Werner Hertzog Mike Kohut |
author_sort |
Norbert Ross |
title |
Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table |
title_short |
Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table |
title_full |
Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table |
title_fullStr |
Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table |
title_full_unstemmed |
Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table |
title_sort |
language, culture and spatial cognition: bringing anthropology to the table |
publisher |
New Prairie Press |
series |
The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication |
issn |
1944-3676 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
Languages vary in their semantic partitioning of the world. This has led to speculation that language might shape basic cognitive processes. Spatial cognition has been an area of research in which linguistic relativity – the effect of language on thought – has both been proposed and rejected. Prior studies have been inconclusive, lacking experimental rigor or appropriate research design. Lacking detailed ethnographic knowledge as well as failing to pay attention to intralanguage variations, these studies often fall short of defining an appropriate concept of language, culture, and cognition. Our study constitutes the first research exploring (1) individuals speaking different languages yet living (for generations) in the same immediate environment and (2) systematic intralanguage variation. Results show that language does not shape spatial cognition and plays at best the secondary role of foregrounding alternative possibilities for encoding spatial arrangements. |
topic |
Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis Culture Language and Cognition Language and Spatial Cognition |
url |
http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=biyclc |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT norbertross languagecultureandspatialcognitionbringinganthropologytothetable AT jeffreytshenton languagecultureandspatialcognitionbringinganthropologytothetable AT wernerhertzog languagecultureandspatialcognitionbringinganthropologytothetable AT mikekohut languagecultureandspatialcognitionbringinganthropologytothetable |
_version_ |
1721352553879306240 |