Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table

Languages vary in their semantic partitioning of the world. This has led to speculation that language might shape basic cognitive processes. Spatial cognition has been an area of research in which linguistic relativity – the effect of language on thought – has both been proposed and rejected. Prior...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norbert Ross, Jeffrey T. Shenton, Werner Hertzog, Mike Kohut
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: New Prairie Press 2015-12-01
Series:The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=biyclc
id doaj-4c08200f58944b7fbae6ea2b3179c537
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c08200f58944b7fbae6ea2b3179c5372021-06-30T19:33:17ZengNew Prairie PressThe Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication1944-36762015-12-011010.4148/1944-3676.1100 Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the tableNorbert Ross 0Jeffrey T. Shenton 1Werner Hertzog 2Mike Kohut 3Vanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt UniversityLanguages vary in their semantic partitioning of the world. This has led to speculation that language might shape basic cognitive processes. Spatial cognition has been an area of research in which linguistic relativity – the effect of language on thought – has both been proposed and rejected. Prior studies have been inconclusive, lacking experimental rigor or appropriate research design. Lacking detailed ethnographic knowledge as well as failing to pay attention to intralanguage variations, these studies often fall short of defining an appropriate concept of language, culture, and cognition. Our study constitutes the first research exploring (1) individuals speaking different languages yet living (for generations) in the same immediate environment and (2) systematic intralanguage variation. Results show that language does not shape spatial cognition and plays at best the secondary role of foregrounding alternative possibilities for encoding spatial arrangements.http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=biyclcLinguistic Relativity HypothesisCultureLanguage and CognitionLanguage and Spatial Cognition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Norbert Ross
Jeffrey T. Shenton
Werner Hertzog
Mike Kohut
spellingShingle Norbert Ross
Jeffrey T. Shenton
Werner Hertzog
Mike Kohut
Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table
The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis
Culture
Language and Cognition
Language and Spatial Cognition
author_facet Norbert Ross
Jeffrey T. Shenton
Werner Hertzog
Mike Kohut
author_sort Norbert Ross
title Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table
title_short Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table
title_full Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table
title_fullStr Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table
title_full_unstemmed Language, Culture and Spatial Cognition: Bringing anthropology to the table
title_sort language, culture and spatial cognition: bringing anthropology to the table
publisher New Prairie Press
series The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication
issn 1944-3676
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Languages vary in their semantic partitioning of the world. This has led to speculation that language might shape basic cognitive processes. Spatial cognition has been an area of research in which linguistic relativity – the effect of language on thought – has both been proposed and rejected. Prior studies have been inconclusive, lacking experimental rigor or appropriate research design. Lacking detailed ethnographic knowledge as well as failing to pay attention to intralanguage variations, these studies often fall short of defining an appropriate concept of language, culture, and cognition. Our study constitutes the first research exploring (1) individuals speaking different languages yet living (for generations) in the same immediate environment and (2) systematic intralanguage variation. Results show that language does not shape spatial cognition and plays at best the secondary role of foregrounding alternative possibilities for encoding spatial arrangements.
topic Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis
Culture
Language and Cognition
Language and Spatial Cognition
url http://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1100&context=biyclc
work_keys_str_mv AT norbertross languagecultureandspatialcognitionbringinganthropologytothetable
AT jeffreytshenton languagecultureandspatialcognitionbringinganthropologytothetable
AT wernerhertzog languagecultureandspatialcognitionbringinganthropologytothetable
AT mikekohut languagecultureandspatialcognitionbringinganthropologytothetable
_version_ 1721352553879306240