Post-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury

Abstract Post-traumatic seizures (PTS) are a common and debilitating complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and could have a harmful impact on the progress of patient rehabilitation. To assess the effect of PTS and relative therapy on outcome in the initial phase after TBI, during the rehabili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valeria Pingue, Chiara Mele, Antonio Nardone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84203-y
id doaj-4c03a8c1fb64447d83da4235adb39940
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4c03a8c1fb64447d83da4235adb399402021-03-11T12:15:30ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-0111111210.1038/s41598-021-84203-yPost-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injuryValeria Pingue0Chiara Mele1Antonio Nardone2Neurorehabilitation and Spinal Unit, Institute of Pavia, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCSDepartment of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of PaviaNeurorehabilitation and Spinal Unit, Institute of Pavia, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCSAbstract Post-traumatic seizures (PTS) are a common and debilitating complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and could have a harmful impact on the progress of patient rehabilitation. To assess the effect of PTS and relative therapy on outcome in the initial phase after TBI, during the rehabilitation process when neuroplasticity is at its highest, we retrospectively examined the clinical data of 341 adult patients undergoing rehabilitation for at least 6 months post-TBI in our neurorehabilitation unit between 2008 and 2019. We correlated through logistic regression the occurrence of seizures and use of anti-seizure medication (ASM) with neurological and functional outcomes, respectively assessed with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). PTS were documented in 19.4% of patients: early PTS (EPTS) in 7.0%; late PTS (LPTS) in 9.4%; both types in 3.0%. Patients who developed EPTS had an increased risk of developing LPTS (OR = 3.90, CI 95% 1.58–9.63, p = 0.003). Patients with LPTS had a significantly higher risk of worse neurological (p < 0.0001) and rehabilitation (p < 0.05) outcome. Overall, 38.7% of patients underwent therapy with ASM; prophylactic therapy was prescribed in 24.0% of patients, of whom 14.6% subsequently developed seizures. Mortality was associated with a lower FIM and GCS score on admission but not significantly with PTS. The use of ASM was associated with a worse rehabilitation outcome, independently of the onset of epilepsy during treatment. LPTS appear to exert a negative impact on rehabilitation outcome and their occurrence is not reduced by prophylactic therapy, whereas EPTS do not influence outcome. Our findings caution against the generic use of prophylactic therapy to prevent post-traumatic epilepsy in patients with TBI.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84203-y
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valeria Pingue
Chiara Mele
Antonio Nardone
spellingShingle Valeria Pingue
Chiara Mele
Antonio Nardone
Post-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury
Scientific Reports
author_facet Valeria Pingue
Chiara Mele
Antonio Nardone
author_sort Valeria Pingue
title Post-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury
title_short Post-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury
title_full Post-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury
title_fullStr Post-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury
title_full_unstemmed Post-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury
title_sort post-traumatic seizures and antiepileptic therapy as predictors of the functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Post-traumatic seizures (PTS) are a common and debilitating complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and could have a harmful impact on the progress of patient rehabilitation. To assess the effect of PTS and relative therapy on outcome in the initial phase after TBI, during the rehabilitation process when neuroplasticity is at its highest, we retrospectively examined the clinical data of 341 adult patients undergoing rehabilitation for at least 6 months post-TBI in our neurorehabilitation unit between 2008 and 2019. We correlated through logistic regression the occurrence of seizures and use of anti-seizure medication (ASM) with neurological and functional outcomes, respectively assessed with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). PTS were documented in 19.4% of patients: early PTS (EPTS) in 7.0%; late PTS (LPTS) in 9.4%; both types in 3.0%. Patients who developed EPTS had an increased risk of developing LPTS (OR = 3.90, CI 95% 1.58–9.63, p = 0.003). Patients with LPTS had a significantly higher risk of worse neurological (p < 0.0001) and rehabilitation (p < 0.05) outcome. Overall, 38.7% of patients underwent therapy with ASM; prophylactic therapy was prescribed in 24.0% of patients, of whom 14.6% subsequently developed seizures. Mortality was associated with a lower FIM and GCS score on admission but not significantly with PTS. The use of ASM was associated with a worse rehabilitation outcome, independently of the onset of epilepsy during treatment. LPTS appear to exert a negative impact on rehabilitation outcome and their occurrence is not reduced by prophylactic therapy, whereas EPTS do not influence outcome. Our findings caution against the generic use of prophylactic therapy to prevent post-traumatic epilepsy in patients with TBI.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84203-y
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriapingue posttraumaticseizuresandantiepileptictherapyaspredictorsofthefunctionaloutcomeinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury
AT chiaramele posttraumaticseizuresandantiepileptictherapyaspredictorsofthefunctionaloutcomeinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury
AT antonionardone posttraumaticseizuresandantiepileptictherapyaspredictorsofthefunctionaloutcomeinpatientswithtraumaticbraininjury
_version_ 1724224572457222144