Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting

An estimated 2.6 billion people rely on traditional biomass for home cooking and heating, so improving the efficiency of household cookstoves could provide significant environmental, social and economic benefits. Some researchers have estimated that potential greenhouse gas emission reductions could...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carrie M. Lee, Chelsea Chandler, Michael Lazarus, Francis X. Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Librelloph 2014-03-01
Series:Challenges in Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/45
id doaj-4bfafedcdccd4dc0b2a42140c83c19f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4bfafedcdccd4dc0b2a42140c83c19f62020-11-24T20:59:55ZengLibrellophChallenges in Sustainability2297-64772014-03-0112537110.12924/cis2013.0102005336Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions AccountingCarrie M. Lee0Chelsea Chandler1Michael Lazarus2Francis X. Johnson3Stockholm Environment Institute, USAStockholm Environment Institute, USAStockholm Environment Institute, USAStockholm Environment Institute, SwedenAn estimated 2.6 billion people rely on traditional biomass for home cooking and heating, so improving the efficiency of household cookstoves could provide significant environmental, social and economic benefits. Some researchers have estimated that potential greenhouse gas emission reductions could exceed 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) per year. Carbon finance offers a policy mechanism for realizing some of this potential and could also bring improved monitoring to cookstove projects. However, there are formidable methodological challenges in estimating emission reductions. This paper evaluates the quantification approaches to three key variables in calculating emission impacts: biomass fuel consumption, fraction of non-renewable biomass, and emission factors for fuel consumption. It draws on a literature review as well as on interviews with technical experts and market actors, and identifies lessons learned and knowledge gaps. Key research needs identified include incorporating accounting for uncertainty; development of additional default factors for biomass consumption for baseline stoves; refinement of monitoring approaches for cookstove use; broadened scope of emission factors used for cookstoves; accounting for non-CO<sub>2</sub> gases and black carbon; and refinement of estimates and approaches to considering emissions from bioenergy use across methodologies.http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/45carbon marketcarbon accountinghousehold energy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carrie M. Lee
Chelsea Chandler
Michael Lazarus
Francis X. Johnson
spellingShingle Carrie M. Lee
Chelsea Chandler
Michael Lazarus
Francis X. Johnson
Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting
Challenges in Sustainability
carbon market
carbon accounting
household energy
author_facet Carrie M. Lee
Chelsea Chandler
Michael Lazarus
Francis X. Johnson
author_sort Carrie M. Lee
title Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting
title_short Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting
title_full Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting
title_fullStr Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Climate Impacts of Cookstove Projects: Issues in Emissions Accounting
title_sort assessing the climate impacts of cookstove projects: issues in emissions accounting
publisher Librelloph
series Challenges in Sustainability
issn 2297-6477
publishDate 2014-03-01
description An estimated 2.6 billion people rely on traditional biomass for home cooking and heating, so improving the efficiency of household cookstoves could provide significant environmental, social and economic benefits. Some researchers have estimated that potential greenhouse gas emission reductions could exceed 1 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) per year. Carbon finance offers a policy mechanism for realizing some of this potential and could also bring improved monitoring to cookstove projects. However, there are formidable methodological challenges in estimating emission reductions. This paper evaluates the quantification approaches to three key variables in calculating emission impacts: biomass fuel consumption, fraction of non-renewable biomass, and emission factors for fuel consumption. It draws on a literature review as well as on interviews with technical experts and market actors, and identifies lessons learned and knowledge gaps. Key research needs identified include incorporating accounting for uncertainty; development of additional default factors for biomass consumption for baseline stoves; refinement of monitoring approaches for cookstove use; broadened scope of emission factors used for cookstoves; accounting for non-CO<sub>2</sub> gases and black carbon; and refinement of estimates and approaches to considering emissions from bioenergy use across methodologies.
topic carbon market
carbon accounting
household energy
url http://www.librelloph.com/challengesinsustainability/article/view/45
work_keys_str_mv AT carriemlee assessingtheclimateimpactsofcookstoveprojectsissuesinemissionsaccounting
AT chelseachandler assessingtheclimateimpactsofcookstoveprojectsissuesinemissionsaccounting
AT michaellazarus assessingtheclimateimpactsofcookstoveprojectsissuesinemissionsaccounting
AT francisxjohnson assessingtheclimateimpactsofcookstoveprojectsissuesinemissionsaccounting
_version_ 1716781001687957504