Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure

Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Background: Septic hemodynamic instability imposes challenges to critical care physician in deciding fluid management to optimize preload dependency state. Methods: Thirty patients wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Randa Soliman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2017-08-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730317300063
id doaj-4bfad8b172044ce8a44f151f2a6d4462
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4bfad8b172044ce8a44f151f2a6d44622020-11-25T03:32:00ZengWolters KluwerEgyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine2090-73032017-08-0152656810.1016/j.ejccm.2017.03.001Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failureRanda SolimanPrediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Background: Septic hemodynamic instability imposes challenges to critical care physician in deciding fluid management to optimize preload dependency state. Methods: Thirty patients with severe sepsis and hypotension (Mean arterial pressure i.e. MAP < 65 mmHg) and evidence of tissue hypotension i.e. lactate level ≥4 mmol/L were enrolled in our study. Fluid resuscitation (30 ml/kg) was administered. Fluid response was defined as MAP ≥ 65 mmHg with lactate level <4 mmol/L cardiac output (CO), measured by electrical cardiometry, in guiding fluid therapy. Results: The study included 13 males (43.3%) with age 47.8 ± 19.7. Paired comparison showed significant change in MAP readings (P value < 0.001). ROC curve showed cutoff 12.5% for delta CO to predict fluid responsiveness with Area under Curve (AUC) 0.927, sensitivity 90.0%, and specificity 70.0%. ROC also showed delta CO cutoff 12.5% to predict survival with AUC 0.756, sensitivity 66.7% and specificity 66.7%. Conclusion: Delta change in cardiac output, measured by electric cardiometry could be used to predict fluid response and survival in acute circulatory failure in septic critically ill patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730317300063
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Randa Soliman
spellingShingle Randa Soliman
Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure
Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
author_facet Randa Soliman
author_sort Randa Soliman
title Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure
title_short Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure
title_full Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure
title_fullStr Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure
title_sort prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
issn 2090-7303
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Prediction of fluid status and survival by electrical cardiometry in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Background: Septic hemodynamic instability imposes challenges to critical care physician in deciding fluid management to optimize preload dependency state. Methods: Thirty patients with severe sepsis and hypotension (Mean arterial pressure i.e. MAP < 65 mmHg) and evidence of tissue hypotension i.e. lactate level ≥4 mmol/L were enrolled in our study. Fluid resuscitation (30 ml/kg) was administered. Fluid response was defined as MAP ≥ 65 mmHg with lactate level <4 mmol/L cardiac output (CO), measured by electrical cardiometry, in guiding fluid therapy. Results: The study included 13 males (43.3%) with age 47.8 ± 19.7. Paired comparison showed significant change in MAP readings (P value < 0.001). ROC curve showed cutoff 12.5% for delta CO to predict fluid responsiveness with Area under Curve (AUC) 0.927, sensitivity 90.0%, and specificity 70.0%. ROC also showed delta CO cutoff 12.5% to predict survival with AUC 0.756, sensitivity 66.7% and specificity 66.7%. Conclusion: Delta change in cardiac output, measured by electric cardiometry could be used to predict fluid response and survival in acute circulatory failure in septic critically ill patients.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090730317300063
work_keys_str_mv AT randasoliman predictionoffluidstatusandsurvivalbyelectricalcardiometryinsepticpatientswithacutecirculatoryfailure
_version_ 1724570316964888576