The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: a population-based prospective cohort study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous investigations of test re-test reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) have used correlations and statistics such as Cronbach's α to assess consistency. In practice, the MMSE is usually used to group ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brayne Carol, Chatfield Mark, Marioni Riccardo E, Matthews Fiona E
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-09-01
Series:BMC Medical Research Methodology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/127
id doaj-4bf3fbf7ef8047998423adc3c00a266c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4bf3fbf7ef8047998423adc3c00a266c2020-11-24T23:16:29ZengBMCBMC Medical Research Methodology1471-22882011-09-0111112710.1186/1471-2288-11-127The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: a population-based prospective cohort studyBrayne CarolChatfield MarkMarioni Riccardo EMatthews Fiona E<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous investigations of test re-test reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) have used correlations and statistics such as Cronbach's α to assess consistency. In practice, the MMSE is usually used to group individuals into cognitive states. The reliability of this grouping (state based approach) has not been fully explored.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>MMSE data were collected on a subset of 2,275 older participants (≥ 65 years) from the population-based Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Two measurements taken approximately two months apart were used to investigate three state-based categorisations. Descriptive statistics were used to determine how many people remained in the same cognitive group or went up or down groups. Weighted logistic regression was used to identify predictive characteristics of those who moved group.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The proportion of people who remained in the same MMSE group at screen and follow-up assessment ranged from 58% to 78%. The proportion of individuals who went up one or more groups was roughly equal to the proportion that went down one or more groups; most of the change occurred when measurements were close to the cut-points. There was no consistently significant predictor for changing cognitive group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A state-based approach to analysing the reliability of the MMSE provided similar results to correlation analyses. State-based models of cognitive change or individual trajectory models using raw scores need multiple waves to help overcome natural variation in MMSE scores and to help identify true cognitive change.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/127MMSEreliabilitytest-retestageingelderly
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brayne Carol
Chatfield Mark
Marioni Riccardo E
Matthews Fiona E
spellingShingle Brayne Carol
Chatfield Mark
Marioni Riccardo E
Matthews Fiona E
The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: a population-based prospective cohort study
BMC Medical Research Methodology
MMSE
reliability
test-retest
ageing
elderly
author_facet Brayne Carol
Chatfield Mark
Marioni Riccardo E
Matthews Fiona E
author_sort Brayne Carol
title The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: a population-based prospective cohort study
title_short The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: a population-based prospective cohort study
title_full The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: a population-based prospective cohort study
title_fullStr The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: a population-based prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the Mini Mental-State Examination: a population-based prospective cohort study
title_sort reliability of assigning individuals to cognitive states using the mini mental-state examination: a population-based prospective cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Research Methodology
issn 1471-2288
publishDate 2011-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous investigations of test re-test reliability of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) have used correlations and statistics such as Cronbach's α to assess consistency. In practice, the MMSE is usually used to group individuals into cognitive states. The reliability of this grouping (state based approach) has not been fully explored.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>MMSE data were collected on a subset of 2,275 older participants (≥ 65 years) from the population-based Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Two measurements taken approximately two months apart were used to investigate three state-based categorisations. Descriptive statistics were used to determine how many people remained in the same cognitive group or went up or down groups. Weighted logistic regression was used to identify predictive characteristics of those who moved group.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The proportion of people who remained in the same MMSE group at screen and follow-up assessment ranged from 58% to 78%. The proportion of individuals who went up one or more groups was roughly equal to the proportion that went down one or more groups; most of the change occurred when measurements were close to the cut-points. There was no consistently significant predictor for changing cognitive group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A state-based approach to analysing the reliability of the MMSE provided similar results to correlation analyses. State-based models of cognitive change or individual trajectory models using raw scores need multiple waves to help overcome natural variation in MMSE scores and to help identify true cognitive change.</p>
topic MMSE
reliability
test-retest
ageing
elderly
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/127
work_keys_str_mv AT braynecarol thereliabilityofassigningindividualstocognitivestatesusingtheminimentalstateexaminationapopulationbasedprospectivecohortstudy
AT chatfieldmark thereliabilityofassigningindividualstocognitivestatesusingtheminimentalstateexaminationapopulationbasedprospectivecohortstudy
AT marioniriccardoe thereliabilityofassigningindividualstocognitivestatesusingtheminimentalstateexaminationapopulationbasedprospectivecohortstudy
AT matthewsfionae thereliabilityofassigningindividualstocognitivestatesusingtheminimentalstateexaminationapopulationbasedprospectivecohortstudy
AT braynecarol reliabilityofassigningindividualstocognitivestatesusingtheminimentalstateexaminationapopulationbasedprospectivecohortstudy
AT chatfieldmark reliabilityofassigningindividualstocognitivestatesusingtheminimentalstateexaminationapopulationbasedprospectivecohortstudy
AT marioniriccardoe reliabilityofassigningindividualstocognitivestatesusingtheminimentalstateexaminationapopulationbasedprospectivecohortstudy
AT matthewsfionae reliabilityofassigningindividualstocognitivestatesusingtheminimentalstateexaminationapopulationbasedprospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1725587105865793536