Fasting of the Day of Doubt as a Precautionary Measure for Performance of the Fasting Ordinance

The study deals with the different opinions in Islamic jurisprudence on the precaution for fasting the first day of the month of Ramadan by fasting the Thirtieth day of the month of Sha'ban. in the case of not being able to see the crescent the night before for reasons of clouds or such like. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali F. Aldoghaiman
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: King Saud University 1996-01-01
Series:Journal of Islamic Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/v8n11996-1.pdf
id doaj-4bd23b8b2e8348d89aaa88042963da22
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4bd23b8b2e8348d89aaa88042963da222020-11-24T23:58:46ZaraKing Saud UniversityJournal of Islamic Studies1658-63011658-63011996-01-0181161Fasting of the Day of Doubt as a Precautionary Measure for Performance of the Fasting Ordinance Ali F. AldoghaimanThe study deals with the different opinions in Islamic jurisprudence on the precaution for fasting the first day of the month of Ramadan by fasting the Thirtieth day of the month of Sha'ban. in the case of not being able to see the crescent the night before for reasons of clouds or such like. This precautionary fasting is debatable among Islamic Jurists as to its lawfulness. and its sufficiency for performance of the ordinance if it coincided with the first of Ramadan. There are five stands on this issue. First, to follow the Imam. Second. to comply with the requirement of the most common situation of the months' wholeness or decrease. Third, to follow the arithmetic of the movement of the moon. Fourth, it is lawful to fast that day and the fasting suffices for performance of ordinance if it coincided with Ramadan. But jurists who take this stand disagree among themselves on some subdivision issues. Firth , that precaution is unlawful. But those who take this stand also differ on the sufficiency and the degree of unlawfulness. The study aimed to survey, discuss, and verify these stands. One of the main findings, outlined in the conclusion. is that the precautionary fasting is unlawful, besides it does not acquit the conscience from performance of the ordinancehttps://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/v8n11996-1.pdfFastingDay of DoubtThe Fasting OrdinanceThe month of RamadanThe month of Sha'ban
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali F. Aldoghaiman
spellingShingle Ali F. Aldoghaiman
Fasting of the Day of Doubt as a Precautionary Measure for Performance of the Fasting Ordinance
Journal of Islamic Studies
Fasting
Day of Doubt
The Fasting Ordinance
The month of Ramadan
The month of Sha'ban
author_facet Ali F. Aldoghaiman
author_sort Ali F. Aldoghaiman
title Fasting of the Day of Doubt as a Precautionary Measure for Performance of the Fasting Ordinance
title_short Fasting of the Day of Doubt as a Precautionary Measure for Performance of the Fasting Ordinance
title_full Fasting of the Day of Doubt as a Precautionary Measure for Performance of the Fasting Ordinance
title_fullStr Fasting of the Day of Doubt as a Precautionary Measure for Performance of the Fasting Ordinance
title_full_unstemmed Fasting of the Day of Doubt as a Precautionary Measure for Performance of the Fasting Ordinance
title_sort fasting of the day of doubt as a precautionary measure for performance of the fasting ordinance
publisher King Saud University
series Journal of Islamic Studies
issn 1658-6301
1658-6301
publishDate 1996-01-01
description The study deals with the different opinions in Islamic jurisprudence on the precaution for fasting the first day of the month of Ramadan by fasting the Thirtieth day of the month of Sha'ban. in the case of not being able to see the crescent the night before for reasons of clouds or such like. This precautionary fasting is debatable among Islamic Jurists as to its lawfulness. and its sufficiency for performance of the ordinance if it coincided with the first of Ramadan. There are five stands on this issue. First, to follow the Imam. Second. to comply with the requirement of the most common situation of the months' wholeness or decrease. Third, to follow the arithmetic of the movement of the moon. Fourth, it is lawful to fast that day and the fasting suffices for performance of ordinance if it coincided with Ramadan. But jurists who take this stand disagree among themselves on some subdivision issues. Firth , that precaution is unlawful. But those who take this stand also differ on the sufficiency and the degree of unlawfulness. The study aimed to survey, discuss, and verify these stands. One of the main findings, outlined in the conclusion. is that the precautionary fasting is unlawful, besides it does not acquit the conscience from performance of the ordinance
topic Fasting
Day of Doubt
The Fasting Ordinance
The month of Ramadan
The month of Sha'ban
url https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/v8n11996-1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alifaldoghaiman fastingofthedayofdoubtasaprecautionarymeasureforperformanceofthefastingordinance
_version_ 1725449879030857728