The production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract space
This paper reports results from a critical discourse analysis of Annual Reports for Corrections Corporation of America and Geo Group, Inc. (formerly Wackenhut), the two largest private prison firms currently operating in the United States. Considerable geographic scholarship has analyzed privatizati...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Geographica Helvetica |
Online Access: | http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/325/2014/gh-69-325-2014.pdf |
id |
doaj-4bca0e93505c443eb5c39fe7195d8bde |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4bca0e93505c443eb5c39fe7195d8bde2020-11-24T22:51:16ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982014-12-0169532533310.5194/gh-69-325-2014The production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract spaceM. L. Mitchelson0Department of Geography & Anthropology, Kennesaw State University, Georgia, USAThis paper reports results from a critical discourse analysis of Annual Reports for Corrections Corporation of America and Geo Group, Inc. (formerly Wackenhut), the two largest private prison firms currently operating in the United States. Considerable geographic scholarship has analyzed privatization, on the one hand, and imprisonment, on the other. However, geographers have paid less attention to explicitly for-profit imprisonment. In particular, geographers have overlooked or ignored the emergence of bedspace, a concept that now pervades penal discourse. Rather than continuing conventional public-versus-private prison debates, this paper identifies bedspace as the discursive common ground upon which private prison industrialists and the state actually converge. Applying Henri Lefebvre's theorization of "abstract space" to imprisonment, I argue that the discursive creation of bedspace produces a nondialectical representation of space that is fully commodified and bureaucratized. However, the paper concludes that this nondialectical space problematically severs the immanently human geography of imprisonment, which is a "messy" space that is always lived and experienced in particular ways, from its inanimate architectural infrastructure (i.e., beds). Beyond the potential ethical and empirical challenges raised by the production of such an abstract space, bedspace signals the discursive and material convergence of state punishment with capital flows that build and often move beyond prison boundaries while obscuring violent geographies.http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/325/2014/gh-69-325-2014.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
M. L. Mitchelson |
spellingShingle |
M. L. Mitchelson The production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract space Geographica Helvetica |
author_facet |
M. L. Mitchelson |
author_sort |
M. L. Mitchelson |
title |
The production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract space |
title_short |
The production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract space |
title_full |
The production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract space |
title_fullStr |
The production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract space |
title_full_unstemmed |
The production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract space |
title_sort |
production of bedspace: prison privatization and abstract space |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geographica Helvetica |
issn |
0016-7312 2194-8798 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
This paper reports results from a critical discourse analysis of Annual
Reports for Corrections Corporation of America and Geo Group, Inc. (formerly
Wackenhut), the two largest private prison firms currently operating in the
United States. Considerable geographic scholarship has analyzed
privatization, on the one hand, and imprisonment, on the other. However,
geographers have paid less attention to explicitly for-profit imprisonment.
In particular, geographers have overlooked or ignored the emergence of
bedspace, a concept that now pervades penal discourse. Rather than
continuing conventional public-versus-private prison debates, this paper
identifies bedspace as the discursive common ground upon which private
prison industrialists and the state actually converge. Applying Henri
Lefebvre's theorization of "abstract space" to imprisonment, I argue that
the discursive creation of bedspace produces a nondialectical representation
of space that is fully commodified and bureaucratized. However, the paper
concludes that this nondialectical space problematically severs the
immanently human geography of imprisonment, which is a "messy" space that is
always lived and experienced in particular ways, from its inanimate
architectural infrastructure (i.e., beds). Beyond the potential ethical and
empirical challenges raised by the production of such an abstract space,
bedspace signals the discursive and material convergence of state punishment
with capital flows that build and often move beyond prison boundaries while
obscuring violent geographies. |
url |
http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/325/2014/gh-69-325-2014.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mlmitchelson theproductionofbedspaceprisonprivatizationandabstractspace AT mlmitchelson productionofbedspaceprisonprivatizationandabstractspace |
_version_ |
1725670569738764288 |