Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing

Abstract In this study, using the M5 algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), the capability of stepped spillways regarding energy dissipation (ED) was approximated. For this purpose, relevant data was collected from valid sources. The study of the developed model based on the M5...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abbas Parsaie, Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-07-01
Series:Applied Water Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-019-1019-4
id doaj-4bb990a20d2a4c38be751e704d7ac717
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4bb990a20d2a4c38be751e704d7ac7172020-11-25T02:41:22ZengSpringerOpenApplied Water Science2190-54872190-54952019-07-01961710.1007/s13201-019-1019-4Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computingAbbas Parsaie0Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi1Hydro-Structure Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of AhvazWater Engineering Department, Lorestan UniversityAbstract In this study, using the M5 algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), the capability of stepped spillways regarding energy dissipation (ED) was approximated. For this purpose, relevant data was collected from valid sources. The study of the developed model based on the M5 algorithm showed that the Drop and Froude numbers play important roles in modeling and approximating the ED. The error indices of M5 algorithm in training were R 2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 2.48 and in testing were R 2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 2.23. The study of developed MLPNN revealed that this model has one hidden layer which includes five neurons. Among the tested transfer functions, the great efficiency was related to the Tansing function. The error indices of MLPNN in training were R 2 = 0.97 and RMSE = 3.73 and in testing stages were R 2 = 0.97 and RMSE = 3.98. Evaluation of the results of both applied methods shows that the accuracy of the MLPNN is a bit less than the M5 algorithm.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-019-1019-4Energy dissipationSoft computingDrop numberSpillwaysM5 algorithm
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abbas Parsaie
Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi
spellingShingle Abbas Parsaie
Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi
Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing
Applied Water Science
Energy dissipation
Soft computing
Drop number
Spillways
M5 algorithm
author_facet Abbas Parsaie
Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi
author_sort Abbas Parsaie
title Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing
title_short Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing
title_full Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing
title_fullStr Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing
title_sort evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing
publisher SpringerOpen
series Applied Water Science
issn 2190-5487
2190-5495
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract In this study, using the M5 algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), the capability of stepped spillways regarding energy dissipation (ED) was approximated. For this purpose, relevant data was collected from valid sources. The study of the developed model based on the M5 algorithm showed that the Drop and Froude numbers play important roles in modeling and approximating the ED. The error indices of M5 algorithm in training were R 2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 2.48 and in testing were R 2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 2.23. The study of developed MLPNN revealed that this model has one hidden layer which includes five neurons. Among the tested transfer functions, the great efficiency was related to the Tansing function. The error indices of MLPNN in training were R 2 = 0.97 and RMSE = 3.73 and in testing stages were R 2 = 0.97 and RMSE = 3.98. Evaluation of the results of both applied methods shows that the accuracy of the MLPNN is a bit less than the M5 algorithm.
topic Energy dissipation
Soft computing
Drop number
Spillways
M5 algorithm
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-019-1019-4
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasparsaie evaluationofenergydissipationonsteppedspillwayusingevolutionarycomputing
AT amirhamzehhaghiabi evaluationofenergydissipationonsteppedspillwayusingevolutionarycomputing
_version_ 1724778740681015296