Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing
Abstract In this study, using the M5 algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), the capability of stepped spillways regarding energy dissipation (ED) was approximated. For this purpose, relevant data was collected from valid sources. The study of the developed model based on the M5...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Applied Water Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-019-1019-4 |
id |
doaj-4bb990a20d2a4c38be751e704d7ac717 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4bb990a20d2a4c38be751e704d7ac7172020-11-25T02:41:22ZengSpringerOpenApplied Water Science2190-54872190-54952019-07-01961710.1007/s13201-019-1019-4Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computingAbbas Parsaie0Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi1Hydro-Structure Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of AhvazWater Engineering Department, Lorestan UniversityAbstract In this study, using the M5 algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), the capability of stepped spillways regarding energy dissipation (ED) was approximated. For this purpose, relevant data was collected from valid sources. The study of the developed model based on the M5 algorithm showed that the Drop and Froude numbers play important roles in modeling and approximating the ED. The error indices of M5 algorithm in training were R 2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 2.48 and in testing were R 2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 2.23. The study of developed MLPNN revealed that this model has one hidden layer which includes five neurons. Among the tested transfer functions, the great efficiency was related to the Tansing function. The error indices of MLPNN in training were R 2 = 0.97 and RMSE = 3.73 and in testing stages were R 2 = 0.97 and RMSE = 3.98. Evaluation of the results of both applied methods shows that the accuracy of the MLPNN is a bit less than the M5 algorithm.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-019-1019-4Energy dissipationSoft computingDrop numberSpillwaysM5 algorithm |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Abbas Parsaie Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi |
spellingShingle |
Abbas Parsaie Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing Applied Water Science Energy dissipation Soft computing Drop number Spillways M5 algorithm |
author_facet |
Abbas Parsaie Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi |
author_sort |
Abbas Parsaie |
title |
Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing |
title_short |
Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing |
title_full |
Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing |
title_sort |
evaluation of energy dissipation on stepped spillway using evolutionary computing |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Applied Water Science |
issn |
2190-5487 2190-5495 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Abstract In this study, using the M5 algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN), the capability of stepped spillways regarding energy dissipation (ED) was approximated. For this purpose, relevant data was collected from valid sources. The study of the developed model based on the M5 algorithm showed that the Drop and Froude numbers play important roles in modeling and approximating the ED. The error indices of M5 algorithm in training were R 2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 2.48 and in testing were R 2 = 0.99 and RMSE = 2.23. The study of developed MLPNN revealed that this model has one hidden layer which includes five neurons. Among the tested transfer functions, the great efficiency was related to the Tansing function. The error indices of MLPNN in training were R 2 = 0.97 and RMSE = 3.73 and in testing stages were R 2 = 0.97 and RMSE = 3.98. Evaluation of the results of both applied methods shows that the accuracy of the MLPNN is a bit less than the M5 algorithm. |
topic |
Energy dissipation Soft computing Drop number Spillways M5 algorithm |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-019-1019-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT abbasparsaie evaluationofenergydissipationonsteppedspillwayusingevolutionarycomputing AT amirhamzehhaghiabi evaluationofenergydissipationonsteppedspillwayusingevolutionarycomputing |
_version_ |
1724778740681015296 |