Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest

Most research universities have concrete policies for navigating the conflicts of interest of faculty members. Policies that might constrain university administrators acting on behalf of their schools, so-called institutional conflicts of interest, are absent or poorly developed at most places that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bart Kahr, Mark Hollingsworth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hamilton Publishing, Inc.
Series:The Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity
Online Access:http://jospi.scholasticahq.com/article/7765-massive-faculty-donations-and-institutional-conflicts-of-interest.pdf
id doaj-4bae04d7e2164ed5a563d5f77e52ad0f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4bae04d7e2164ed5a563d5f77e52ad0f2020-11-25T01:46:57ZengHamilton Publishing, Inc.The Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity2689-5587Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of InterestBart KahrMark HollingsworthMost research universities have concrete policies for navigating the conflicts of interest of faculty members. Policies that might constrain university administrators acting on behalf of their schools, so-called institutional conflicts of interest, are absent or poorly developed at most places that could benefit from them. Researchers have argued for the illustration of institutional conflicts as a foundation for policy development. Here, we show the failure of research accountability when a faculty member made massive gifts to a leading American public research university, the University of Washington in Seattle, thereby creating allegiances that undermined commitments to academic values. Correspondence, some from thousands of pages acquired through the Washington State Public Records Act, show faculty colleagues, department chairs, deans, a provost, presidents, and the Board of Regents soliciting and accepting the donor's money but not sufficiently guarding the integrity of science when that was required. These records offer a rare look inside a university scientific misconduct investigation, a process typically shrouded in secrecy under the guise of confidentiality. They amount to a forensic analysis of what can go wrong with science at the nexus of a secret history of misconduct, spectacularly ambitious science, and large donations. The inabilities of federal and state authorities to reckon with institutional conflicts of interest are highlighted. The collective inaction can be understood within Lessig’s framework of institutional corruption. The failings described herein are metaphorical holes in the safety net intended to protect the integrity of American science, a shared practice that is under increasing strain. All public records are available from the authors upon request. Those cited here are included in an appendix posted by the journal.http://jospi.scholasticahq.com/article/7765-massive-faculty-donations-and-institutional-conflicts-of-interest.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bart Kahr
Mark Hollingsworth
spellingShingle Bart Kahr
Mark Hollingsworth
Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest
The Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity
author_facet Bart Kahr
Mark Hollingsworth
author_sort Bart Kahr
title Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest
title_short Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest
title_full Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest
title_fullStr Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest
title_full_unstemmed Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest
title_sort massive faculty donations and institutional conflicts of interest
publisher Hamilton Publishing, Inc.
series The Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity
issn 2689-5587
description Most research universities have concrete policies for navigating the conflicts of interest of faculty members. Policies that might constrain university administrators acting on behalf of their schools, so-called institutional conflicts of interest, are absent or poorly developed at most places that could benefit from them. Researchers have argued for the illustration of institutional conflicts as a foundation for policy development. Here, we show the failure of research accountability when a faculty member made massive gifts to a leading American public research university, the University of Washington in Seattle, thereby creating allegiances that undermined commitments to academic values. Correspondence, some from thousands of pages acquired through the Washington State Public Records Act, show faculty colleagues, department chairs, deans, a provost, presidents, and the Board of Regents soliciting and accepting the donor's money but not sufficiently guarding the integrity of science when that was required. These records offer a rare look inside a university scientific misconduct investigation, a process typically shrouded in secrecy under the guise of confidentiality. They amount to a forensic analysis of what can go wrong with science at the nexus of a secret history of misconduct, spectacularly ambitious science, and large donations. The inabilities of federal and state authorities to reckon with institutional conflicts of interest are highlighted. The collective inaction can be understood within Lessig’s framework of institutional corruption. The failings described herein are metaphorical holes in the safety net intended to protect the integrity of American science, a shared practice that is under increasing strain. All public records are available from the authors upon request. Those cited here are included in an appendix posted by the journal.
url http://jospi.scholasticahq.com/article/7765-massive-faculty-donations-and-institutional-conflicts-of-interest.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bartkahr massivefacultydonationsandinstitutionalconflictsofinterest
AT markhollingsworth massivefacultydonationsandinstitutionalconflictsofinterest
_version_ 1725017093966921728