Comparing multiple model-derived aerosol optical properties to spatially collocated ground-based and satellite measurements
Anthropogenic aerosols are a key factor governing Earth's climate and play a central role in human-caused climate change. However, because of aerosols' complex physical, optical, and dynamical properties, aerosols are one of the most uncertain aspects of climate modeling. Fortunately, aero...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/4451/2017/acp-17-4451-2017.pdf |
Summary: | Anthropogenic aerosols are a key factor governing Earth's
climate and play a central role in human-caused climate change. However,
because of aerosols' complex physical, optical, and dynamical properties,
aerosols are one of the most uncertain aspects of climate modeling.
Fortunately, aerosol measurement networks over the past few decades have led
to the establishment of long-term observations for numerous locations
worldwide. Further, the availability of datasets from several different
measurement techniques (such as ground-based and satellite instruments) can
help scientists increasingly improve modeling efforts. This study explores
the value of evaluating several model-simulated aerosol properties with data
from spatially collocated instruments. We compare aerosol optical depth (AOD; total,
scattering, and absorption), single-scattering albedo (SSA), Ångström
exponent (<i>α</i>), and extinction vertical profiles in two prominent global climate
models (Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, GFDL, CM2.1 and CM3) to seasonal observations from collocated
instruments (AErosol RObotic NETwork, AERONET, and Cloud–Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization, CALIOP)
at seven polluted and biomass burning
regions worldwide. We find that a multi-parameter evaluation provides key
insights on model biases, data from collocated instruments can reveal
underlying aerosol-governing physics, column properties wash out important
vertical distinctions, and <q>improved</q> models does not mean all aspects are
improved. We conclude that it is important to make use of all available data
(parameters and instruments) when evaluating aerosol properties derived by
models. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-7316 1680-7324 |