Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes Situations

Theorists of language have argued that co-speech hand gestures are an intentional part of social communication. The present study provides evidence for these claims by showing that speakers adjust their gesture use according to their perceived relevance to the audience. Participants were asked to re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Judith Holler, Kelly Byrne, Spencer Kelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2011-10-01
Series:Information
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/2/4/579/
id doaj-4b9ca73112c84a47b6004ba61ddc1f1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b9ca73112c84a47b6004ba61ddc1f1d2020-11-25T00:52:22ZengMDPI AGInformation2078-24892011-10-012457959310.3390/info2040579Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes SituationsJudith HollerKelly ByrneSpencer KellyTheorists of language have argued that co-speech hand gestures are an intentional part of social communication. The present study provides evidence for these claims by showing that speakers adjust their gesture use according to their perceived relevance to the audience. Participants were asked to read about items that were and were not useful in a wilderness survival scenario, under the pretense that they would then explain (on camera) what they learned to one of two different audiences. For one audience (a group of college students in a dormitory orientation activity), the stakes of successful communication were low; for the other audience (a group of students preparing for a rugged camping trip in the mountains), the stakes were high. In their explanations to the camera, participants in the high stakes condition produced three times as many representational gestures, and spent three times as much time gesturing, than participants in the low stakes condition. This study extends previous research by showing that the anticipated consequences of one’s communication—namely, the degree to which information may be useful to an intended recipient—influences speakers’ use of gesture.http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/2/4/579/gesturespeechlanguagepragmaticssocialcommunicationnonverbal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Judith Holler
Kelly Byrne
Spencer Kelly
spellingShingle Judith Holler
Kelly Byrne
Spencer Kelly
Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes Situations
Information
gesture
speech
language
pragmatics
social
communication
nonverbal
author_facet Judith Holler
Kelly Byrne
Spencer Kelly
author_sort Judith Holler
title Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes Situations
title_short Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes Situations
title_full Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes Situations
title_fullStr Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes Situations
title_full_unstemmed Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes Situations
title_sort raising the ante of communication: evidence for enhanced gesture use in high stakes situations
publisher MDPI AG
series Information
issn 2078-2489
publishDate 2011-10-01
description Theorists of language have argued that co-speech hand gestures are an intentional part of social communication. The present study provides evidence for these claims by showing that speakers adjust their gesture use according to their perceived relevance to the audience. Participants were asked to read about items that were and were not useful in a wilderness survival scenario, under the pretense that they would then explain (on camera) what they learned to one of two different audiences. For one audience (a group of college students in a dormitory orientation activity), the stakes of successful communication were low; for the other audience (a group of students preparing for a rugged camping trip in the mountains), the stakes were high. In their explanations to the camera, participants in the high stakes condition produced three times as many representational gestures, and spent three times as much time gesturing, than participants in the low stakes condition. This study extends previous research by showing that the anticipated consequences of one’s communication—namely, the degree to which information may be useful to an intended recipient—influences speakers’ use of gesture.
topic gesture
speech
language
pragmatics
social
communication
nonverbal
url http://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/2/4/579/
work_keys_str_mv AT judithholler raisingtheanteofcommunicationevidenceforenhancedgestureuseinhighstakessituations
AT kellybyrne raisingtheanteofcommunicationevidenceforenhancedgestureuseinhighstakessituations
AT spencerkelly raisingtheanteofcommunicationevidenceforenhancedgestureuseinhighstakessituations
_version_ 1725242673985486848