Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications

The easy access to electronic devices for users has resulted in the development of a vast range of programs and applications for visual evaluation and diagnosis that can be downloaded to any device. Some of them are based on tasks and stimuli that depend on luminance. The aim of the present study wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ainhoa Molina-Martín, David P. Piñero, María B. Coco-Martín, Luis Leal-Vega, Dolores de Fez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Technologies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/9/3/68
id doaj-4b84dfd84cc5479386ca727d76adcf5f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b84dfd84cc5479386ca727d76adcf5f2021-09-26T01:32:28ZengMDPI AGTechnologies2227-70802021-09-019686810.3390/technologies9030068Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical ImplicationsAinhoa Molina-Martín0David P. Piñero1María B. Coco-Martín2Luis Leal-Vega3Dolores de Fez4Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainGroup of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, SpainGroup of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, SpainGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainThe easy access to electronic devices for users has resulted in the development of a vast range of programs and applications for visual evaluation and diagnosis that can be downloaded to any device. Some of them are based on tasks and stimuli that depend on luminance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in luminance reproduction between electronic devices and their implications for contrast reproduction. A total of 20 Galaxy Tab A devices with 8-bit graphics processing units were evaluated. Characterization of every screen was performed obtaining the response curve for the achromatic stimulus. Mean, maximum and minimum luminance, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were obtained to assess differences between devices. Variation of luminance with increasing digital level was observed in all devices following a gamma distribution. Comparison between devices for mean results showed that some of them differed by as much as 45 cd/m<sup>2</sup>. The coefficient of variation varied from ~5 to 9%. Mean percentage of differences in luminance between devices reached 30%. In conclusion, differences in luminance reproduction between devices were present, even considering devices from the same manufacturing batch. It cannot be assumed that the characterization of one device can be extrapolated to other devices. Every device used for research purposes should be individually characterized to ensure the correct reproduction. For clinical purposes, limitations should be considered by visual specialists.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/9/3/68contrast sensitivityluminance reproductionluminance characterizationdisplaytabletelectronic device
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ainhoa Molina-Martín
David P. Piñero
María B. Coco-Martín
Luis Leal-Vega
Dolores de Fez
spellingShingle Ainhoa Molina-Martín
David P. Piñero
María B. Coco-Martín
Luis Leal-Vega
Dolores de Fez
Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications
Technologies
contrast sensitivity
luminance reproduction
luminance characterization
display
tablet
electronic device
author_facet Ainhoa Molina-Martín
David P. Piñero
María B. Coco-Martín
Luis Leal-Vega
Dolores de Fez
author_sort Ainhoa Molina-Martín
title Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications
title_short Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications
title_full Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications
title_fullStr Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications
title_sort differences in contrast reproduction between electronic devices for visual assessment: clinical implications
publisher MDPI AG
series Technologies
issn 2227-7080
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The easy access to electronic devices for users has resulted in the development of a vast range of programs and applications for visual evaluation and diagnosis that can be downloaded to any device. Some of them are based on tasks and stimuli that depend on luminance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in luminance reproduction between electronic devices and their implications for contrast reproduction. A total of 20 Galaxy Tab A devices with 8-bit graphics processing units were evaluated. Characterization of every screen was performed obtaining the response curve for the achromatic stimulus. Mean, maximum and minimum luminance, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were obtained to assess differences between devices. Variation of luminance with increasing digital level was observed in all devices following a gamma distribution. Comparison between devices for mean results showed that some of them differed by as much as 45 cd/m<sup>2</sup>. The coefficient of variation varied from ~5 to 9%. Mean percentage of differences in luminance between devices reached 30%. In conclusion, differences in luminance reproduction between devices were present, even considering devices from the same manufacturing batch. It cannot be assumed that the characterization of one device can be extrapolated to other devices. Every device used for research purposes should be individually characterized to ensure the correct reproduction. For clinical purposes, limitations should be considered by visual specialists.
topic contrast sensitivity
luminance reproduction
luminance characterization
display
tablet
electronic device
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/9/3/68
work_keys_str_mv AT ainhoamolinamartin differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications
AT davidppinero differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications
AT mariabcocomartin differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications
AT luislealvega differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications
AT doloresdefez differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications
_version_ 1716868764836823040