Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications
The easy access to electronic devices for users has resulted in the development of a vast range of programs and applications for visual evaluation and diagnosis that can be downloaded to any device. Some of them are based on tasks and stimuli that depend on luminance. The aim of the present study wa...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Technologies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/9/3/68 |
id |
doaj-4b84dfd84cc5479386ca727d76adcf5f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4b84dfd84cc5479386ca727d76adcf5f2021-09-26T01:32:28ZengMDPI AGTechnologies2227-70802021-09-019686810.3390/technologies9030068Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical ImplicationsAinhoa Molina-Martín0David P. Piñero1María B. Coco-Martín2Luis Leal-Vega3Dolores de Fez4Group of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainGroup of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, SpainGroup of Applied Clinical Neurosciences and Advanced Data Analysis, Department of Medicine, Dermatology and Toxicology, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, SpainGroup of Optics and Visual Perception, Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, SpainThe easy access to electronic devices for users has resulted in the development of a vast range of programs and applications for visual evaluation and diagnosis that can be downloaded to any device. Some of them are based on tasks and stimuli that depend on luminance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in luminance reproduction between electronic devices and their implications for contrast reproduction. A total of 20 Galaxy Tab A devices with 8-bit graphics processing units were evaluated. Characterization of every screen was performed obtaining the response curve for the achromatic stimulus. Mean, maximum and minimum luminance, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were obtained to assess differences between devices. Variation of luminance with increasing digital level was observed in all devices following a gamma distribution. Comparison between devices for mean results showed that some of them differed by as much as 45 cd/m<sup>2</sup>. The coefficient of variation varied from ~5 to 9%. Mean percentage of differences in luminance between devices reached 30%. In conclusion, differences in luminance reproduction between devices were present, even considering devices from the same manufacturing batch. It cannot be assumed that the characterization of one device can be extrapolated to other devices. Every device used for research purposes should be individually characterized to ensure the correct reproduction. For clinical purposes, limitations should be considered by visual specialists.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/9/3/68contrast sensitivityluminance reproductionluminance characterizationdisplaytabletelectronic device |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ainhoa Molina-Martín David P. Piñero María B. Coco-Martín Luis Leal-Vega Dolores de Fez |
spellingShingle |
Ainhoa Molina-Martín David P. Piñero María B. Coco-Martín Luis Leal-Vega Dolores de Fez Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications Technologies contrast sensitivity luminance reproduction luminance characterization display tablet electronic device |
author_facet |
Ainhoa Molina-Martín David P. Piñero María B. Coco-Martín Luis Leal-Vega Dolores de Fez |
author_sort |
Ainhoa Molina-Martín |
title |
Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications |
title_short |
Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications |
title_full |
Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications |
title_fullStr |
Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differences in Contrast Reproduction between Electronic Devices for Visual Assessment: Clinical Implications |
title_sort |
differences in contrast reproduction between electronic devices for visual assessment: clinical implications |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Technologies |
issn |
2227-7080 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
The easy access to electronic devices for users has resulted in the development of a vast range of programs and applications for visual evaluation and diagnosis that can be downloaded to any device. Some of them are based on tasks and stimuli that depend on luminance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in luminance reproduction between electronic devices and their implications for contrast reproduction. A total of 20 Galaxy Tab A devices with 8-bit graphics processing units were evaluated. Characterization of every screen was performed obtaining the response curve for the achromatic stimulus. Mean, maximum and minimum luminance, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were obtained to assess differences between devices. Variation of luminance with increasing digital level was observed in all devices following a gamma distribution. Comparison between devices for mean results showed that some of them differed by as much as 45 cd/m<sup>2</sup>. The coefficient of variation varied from ~5 to 9%. Mean percentage of differences in luminance between devices reached 30%. In conclusion, differences in luminance reproduction between devices were present, even considering devices from the same manufacturing batch. It cannot be assumed that the characterization of one device can be extrapolated to other devices. Every device used for research purposes should be individually characterized to ensure the correct reproduction. For clinical purposes, limitations should be considered by visual specialists. |
topic |
contrast sensitivity luminance reproduction luminance characterization display tablet electronic device |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/9/3/68 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ainhoamolinamartin differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications AT davidppinero differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications AT mariabcocomartin differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications AT luislealvega differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications AT doloresdefez differencesincontrastreproductionbetweenelectronicdevicesforvisualassessmentclinicalimplications |
_version_ |
1716868764836823040 |