Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris

Previous studies of public opinion in the United States have reported positive associations between national hubris and support for military actions. This article argues that in addition to its stable aspect, national hubris has a contextual aspect: under perceived symbolic threats to the nation, na...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yuval Feinstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Sociological Science 2016-05-01
Series:Sociological Science
Subjects:
War
Online Access:https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-15-317/
id doaj-4b82ced15a87415899cbdcfde0cdbf0e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b82ced15a87415899cbdcfde0cdbf0e2020-11-25T01:33:58ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962330-66962016-05-0131531733410.15195/v3.a153581Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of HubrisYuval Feinstein0 University of Haifa Previous studies of public opinion in the United States have reported positive associations between national hubris and support for military actions. This article argues that in addition to its stable aspect, national hubris has a contextual aspect: under perceived symbolic threats to the nation, national hubris increases and boosts support for military action. To test this argument, which is grounded in a sociological and social psychological understanding of individuals as members of collectivities who pursue a symbolic politics of status achievement and maintenance, a survey-experiment was conducted with a nationally representative sample. In the experiment, participants who were exposed to rhetoric that highlighted symbolic threats to the nation to justify an impending military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities reported higher levels of national hubris and were more likely to support the military action than either participants who were exposed to internationalist rhetoric or those in the control group.https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-15-317/NationalismPublic OpinionSurvey-ExperiementWar
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuval Feinstein
spellingShingle Yuval Feinstein
Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris
Sociological Science
Nationalism
Public Opinion
Survey-Experiement
War
author_facet Yuval Feinstein
author_sort Yuval Feinstein
title Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris
title_short Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris
title_full Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris
title_fullStr Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris
title_full_unstemmed Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris
title_sort pulling the trigger: how threats to the nation increase support for military action via the generation of hubris
publisher Society for Sociological Science
series Sociological Science
issn 2330-6696
2330-6696
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Previous studies of public opinion in the United States have reported positive associations between national hubris and support for military actions. This article argues that in addition to its stable aspect, national hubris has a contextual aspect: under perceived symbolic threats to the nation, national hubris increases and boosts support for military action. To test this argument, which is grounded in a sociological and social psychological understanding of individuals as members of collectivities who pursue a symbolic politics of status achievement and maintenance, a survey-experiment was conducted with a nationally representative sample. In the experiment, participants who were exposed to rhetoric that highlighted symbolic threats to the nation to justify an impending military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities reported higher levels of national hubris and were more likely to support the military action than either participants who were exposed to internationalist rhetoric or those in the control group.
topic Nationalism
Public Opinion
Survey-Experiement
War
url https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-15-317/
work_keys_str_mv AT yuvalfeinstein pullingthetriggerhowthreatstothenationincreasesupportformilitaryactionviathegenerationofhubris
_version_ 1725074494353047552