Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris
Previous studies of public opinion in the United States have reported positive associations between national hubris and support for military actions. This article argues that in addition to its stable aspect, national hubris has a contextual aspect: under perceived symbolic threats to the nation, na...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Sociological Science
2016-05-01
|
Series: | Sociological Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-15-317/ |
id |
doaj-4b82ced15a87415899cbdcfde0cdbf0e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4b82ced15a87415899cbdcfde0cdbf0e2020-11-25T01:33:58ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962330-66962016-05-0131531733410.15195/v3.a153581Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of HubrisYuval Feinstein0 University of Haifa Previous studies of public opinion in the United States have reported positive associations between national hubris and support for military actions. This article argues that in addition to its stable aspect, national hubris has a contextual aspect: under perceived symbolic threats to the nation, national hubris increases and boosts support for military action. To test this argument, which is grounded in a sociological and social psychological understanding of individuals as members of collectivities who pursue a symbolic politics of status achievement and maintenance, a survey-experiment was conducted with a nationally representative sample. In the experiment, participants who were exposed to rhetoric that highlighted symbolic threats to the nation to justify an impending military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities reported higher levels of national hubris and were more likely to support the military action than either participants who were exposed to internationalist rhetoric or those in the control group.https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-15-317/NationalismPublic OpinionSurvey-ExperiementWar |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yuval Feinstein |
spellingShingle |
Yuval Feinstein Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris Sociological Science Nationalism Public Opinion Survey-Experiement War |
author_facet |
Yuval Feinstein |
author_sort |
Yuval Feinstein |
title |
Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris |
title_short |
Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris |
title_full |
Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris |
title_fullStr |
Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pulling the Trigger: How Threats to the Nation Increase Support for Military Action via the Generation of Hubris |
title_sort |
pulling the trigger: how threats to the nation increase support for military action via the generation of hubris |
publisher |
Society for Sociological Science |
series |
Sociological Science |
issn |
2330-6696 2330-6696 |
publishDate |
2016-05-01 |
description |
Previous studies of public opinion in the United States have reported positive associations between national hubris and support for military actions. This article argues that in addition to its stable aspect, national hubris has a contextual aspect: under perceived symbolic threats to the nation, national hubris increases and boosts support for military action. To test this argument, which is grounded in a sociological and social psychological understanding of individuals as members of collectivities who pursue a symbolic politics of status achievement and maintenance, a survey-experiment was conducted with a nationally representative sample. In the experiment, participants who were exposed to rhetoric that highlighted symbolic threats to the nation to justify an impending military action against Iran’s nuclear facilities reported higher levels of national hubris and were more likely to support the military action than either participants who were exposed to internationalist rhetoric or those in the control group. |
topic |
Nationalism Public Opinion Survey-Experiement War |
url |
https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v3-15-317/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuvalfeinstein pullingthetriggerhowthreatstothenationincreasesupportformilitaryactionviathegenerationofhubris |
_version_ |
1725074494353047552 |