Democratic Dialogue as a Process to Inform Public Policy: Reconceptualizing a Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program

An exploration of the collaborative reconceptualization of a provincial Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program (SOQP) through the use of dialogic approaches is the focus of this inquiry. The stories, perspectives, and lived experiences of supervisory officers, principals, teachers, parents, stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deirdre M. Smith, Jessica Qua-Hiansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Simon Fraser University 2015-06-01
Series:International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership
Online Access:http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/download/454/145
id doaj-4b808f95dacd494d8778b2060e38a6f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b808f95dacd494d8778b2060e38a6f62021-09-02T09:06:43ZengSimon Fraser UniversityInternational Journal of Education Policy and Leadership1555-50622015-06-01101Democratic Dialogue as a Process to Inform Public Policy: Reconceptualizing a Supervisory Officer’s Qualification ProgramDeirdre M. Smith0Jessica Qua-Hiansen1Ontario College of TeachersOntario College of TeachersAn exploration of the collaborative reconceptualization of a provincial Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program (SOQP) through the use of dialogic approaches is the focus of this inquiry. The stories, perspectives, and lived experiences of supervisory officers, principals, teachers, parents, students, and members of the public in Ontario were included as essential voices and information sources within policy development conversations. These narratives of experience revealed the forms of knowledge, skills, dispositions, and ethical commitments necessary for effective supervisory officers today and in the future. They also illustrated the transformative nature of narrative dialogue to enlighten, deepen understanding, and alter perspec- tives. The policy development processes used in this publicly shared educational initiative serve as a model of democratic dialogue. The inclusive and dialogic methods employed to collectively reconceptualize a supervisory officer formation program illustrate an innovative framework for developing policies governing the public good.http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/download/454/145
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deirdre M. Smith
Jessica Qua-Hiansen
spellingShingle Deirdre M. Smith
Jessica Qua-Hiansen
Democratic Dialogue as a Process to Inform Public Policy: Reconceptualizing a Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program
International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership
author_facet Deirdre M. Smith
Jessica Qua-Hiansen
author_sort Deirdre M. Smith
title Democratic Dialogue as a Process to Inform Public Policy: Reconceptualizing a Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program
title_short Democratic Dialogue as a Process to Inform Public Policy: Reconceptualizing a Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program
title_full Democratic Dialogue as a Process to Inform Public Policy: Reconceptualizing a Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program
title_fullStr Democratic Dialogue as a Process to Inform Public Policy: Reconceptualizing a Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program
title_full_unstemmed Democratic Dialogue as a Process to Inform Public Policy: Reconceptualizing a Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program
title_sort democratic dialogue as a process to inform public policy: reconceptualizing a supervisory officer’s qualification program
publisher Simon Fraser University
series International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership
issn 1555-5062
publishDate 2015-06-01
description An exploration of the collaborative reconceptualization of a provincial Supervisory Officer’s Qualification Program (SOQP) through the use of dialogic approaches is the focus of this inquiry. The stories, perspectives, and lived experiences of supervisory officers, principals, teachers, parents, students, and members of the public in Ontario were included as essential voices and information sources within policy development conversations. These narratives of experience revealed the forms of knowledge, skills, dispositions, and ethical commitments necessary for effective supervisory officers today and in the future. They also illustrated the transformative nature of narrative dialogue to enlighten, deepen understanding, and alter perspec- tives. The policy development processes used in this publicly shared educational initiative serve as a model of democratic dialogue. The inclusive and dialogic methods employed to collectively reconceptualize a supervisory officer formation program illustrate an innovative framework for developing policies governing the public good.
url http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/download/454/145
work_keys_str_mv AT deirdremsmith democraticdialogueasaprocesstoinformpublicpolicyreconceptualizingasupervisoryofficersqualificationprogram
AT jessicaquahiansen democraticdialogueasaprocesstoinformpublicpolicyreconceptualizingasupervisoryofficersqualificationprogram
_version_ 1721177313277640704