Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition
This article describes and analyzes the new feature extraction technique, Random Local Descriptor (RLD), that is used for the Permutation Coding Neural Classifier (PCNC), and compares it with Local Binary Pattern (LBP-based) feature extraction. The paper presents a model of face feature detection us...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Electronics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/11/1358 |
id |
doaj-4b78dfcdd7134b75a6d22309ba73928a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4b78dfcdd7134b75a6d22309ba73928a2021-06-30T23:28:29ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922021-06-01101358135810.3390/electronics10111358Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face RecognitionAiram Curtidor0Tetyana Baydyk1Ernst Kussul2Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Ciudad de México 07738, MexicoDepartment of Micro and Nanotechnology, Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology (ICAT), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, MexicoDepartment of Micro and Nanotechnology, Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology (ICAT), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, MexicoThis article describes and analyzes the new feature extraction technique, Random Local Descriptor (RLD), that is used for the Permutation Coding Neural Classifier (PCNC), and compares it with Local Binary Pattern (LBP-based) feature extraction. The paper presents a model of face feature detection using local descriptors, and describes an improvement on the PCNC for the recognition of plane rotated and small displaced face images, as applied to three databases, i.e., ORL, FRAV3D and FEI. All databases are described along with the recognition results that were obtained. We also include a comparison of our classifier with the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Iterative Closest Point (ICP). The ORL database was selected to compare our RLDs with LBP-based algorithms. The PCNC with the RLDs demonstrated the best recognition rate, i.e., 97.49%, in comparison with 90.49% for LBPs. For the FEI image database, we obtained the best recognition rate, i.e., 93.57%, in comparison with 66.74% for LBPs. Using the RLDs and rotating the original images for FRAV3D, we improved the recognition rate by decreasing by approximately twice the number of errors. In addition, we analyzed the influence of different RLD parameters on the quality of facial recognition.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/11/1358face recognitionRandom Local Descriptor (RLD)Local Binary Pattern (LBP) descriptorWeber Local Descriptor (WLD)PCNC neural classifier |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Airam Curtidor Tetyana Baydyk Ernst Kussul |
spellingShingle |
Airam Curtidor Tetyana Baydyk Ernst Kussul Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition Electronics face recognition Random Local Descriptor (RLD) Local Binary Pattern (LBP) descriptor Weber Local Descriptor (WLD) PCNC neural classifier |
author_facet |
Airam Curtidor Tetyana Baydyk Ernst Kussul |
author_sort |
Airam Curtidor |
title |
Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition |
title_short |
Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition |
title_full |
Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition |
title_sort |
analysis of random local descriptors in face recognition |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Electronics |
issn |
2079-9292 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
This article describes and analyzes the new feature extraction technique, Random Local Descriptor (RLD), that is used for the Permutation Coding Neural Classifier (PCNC), and compares it with Local Binary Pattern (LBP-based) feature extraction. The paper presents a model of face feature detection using local descriptors, and describes an improvement on the PCNC for the recognition of plane rotated and small displaced face images, as applied to three databases, i.e., ORL, FRAV3D and FEI. All databases are described along with the recognition results that were obtained. We also include a comparison of our classifier with the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Iterative Closest Point (ICP). The ORL database was selected to compare our RLDs with LBP-based algorithms. The PCNC with the RLDs demonstrated the best recognition rate, i.e., 97.49%, in comparison with 90.49% for LBPs. For the FEI image database, we obtained the best recognition rate, i.e., 93.57%, in comparison with 66.74% for LBPs. Using the RLDs and rotating the original images for FRAV3D, we improved the recognition rate by decreasing by approximately twice the number of errors. In addition, we analyzed the influence of different RLD parameters on the quality of facial recognition. |
topic |
face recognition Random Local Descriptor (RLD) Local Binary Pattern (LBP) descriptor Weber Local Descriptor (WLD) PCNC neural classifier |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/11/1358 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT airamcurtidor analysisofrandomlocaldescriptorsinfacerecognition AT tetyanabaydyk analysisofrandomlocaldescriptorsinfacerecognition AT ernstkussul analysisofrandomlocaldescriptorsinfacerecognition |
_version_ |
1721351211205001216 |