Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition

This article describes and analyzes the new feature extraction technique, Random Local Descriptor (RLD), that is used for the Permutation Coding Neural Classifier (PCNC), and compares it with Local Binary Pattern (LBP-based) feature extraction. The paper presents a model of face feature detection us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Airam Curtidor, Tetyana Baydyk, Ernst Kussul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/11/1358
id doaj-4b78dfcdd7134b75a6d22309ba73928a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b78dfcdd7134b75a6d22309ba73928a2021-06-30T23:28:29ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922021-06-01101358135810.3390/electronics10111358Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face RecognitionAiram Curtidor0Tetyana Baydyk1Ernst Kussul2Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Ciudad de México 07738, MexicoDepartment of Micro and Nanotechnology, Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology (ICAT), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, MexicoDepartment of Micro and Nanotechnology, Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology (ICAT), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City 04510, MexicoThis article describes and analyzes the new feature extraction technique, Random Local Descriptor (RLD), that is used for the Permutation Coding Neural Classifier (PCNC), and compares it with Local Binary Pattern (LBP-based) feature extraction. The paper presents a model of face feature detection using local descriptors, and describes an improvement on the PCNC for the recognition of plane rotated and small displaced face images, as applied to three databases, i.e., ORL, FRAV3D and FEI. All databases are described along with the recognition results that were obtained. We also include a comparison of our classifier with the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Iterative Closest Point (ICP). The ORL database was selected to compare our RLDs with LBP-based algorithms. The PCNC with the RLDs demonstrated the best recognition rate, i.e., 97.49%, in comparison with 90.49% for LBPs. For the FEI image database, we obtained the best recognition rate, i.e., 93.57%, in comparison with 66.74% for LBPs. Using the RLDs and rotating the original images for FRAV3D, we improved the recognition rate by decreasing by approximately twice the number of errors. In addition, we analyzed the influence of different RLD parameters on the quality of facial recognition.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/11/1358face recognitionRandom Local Descriptor (RLD)Local Binary Pattern (LBP) descriptorWeber Local Descriptor (WLD)PCNC neural classifier
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Airam Curtidor
Tetyana Baydyk
Ernst Kussul
spellingShingle Airam Curtidor
Tetyana Baydyk
Ernst Kussul
Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition
Electronics
face recognition
Random Local Descriptor (RLD)
Local Binary Pattern (LBP) descriptor
Weber Local Descriptor (WLD)
PCNC neural classifier
author_facet Airam Curtidor
Tetyana Baydyk
Ernst Kussul
author_sort Airam Curtidor
title Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition
title_short Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition
title_full Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition
title_fullStr Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Random Local Descriptors in Face Recognition
title_sort analysis of random local descriptors in face recognition
publisher MDPI AG
series Electronics
issn 2079-9292
publishDate 2021-06-01
description This article describes and analyzes the new feature extraction technique, Random Local Descriptor (RLD), that is used for the Permutation Coding Neural Classifier (PCNC), and compares it with Local Binary Pattern (LBP-based) feature extraction. The paper presents a model of face feature detection using local descriptors, and describes an improvement on the PCNC for the recognition of plane rotated and small displaced face images, as applied to three databases, i.e., ORL, FRAV3D and FEI. All databases are described along with the recognition results that were obtained. We also include a comparison of our classifier with the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Iterative Closest Point (ICP). The ORL database was selected to compare our RLDs with LBP-based algorithms. The PCNC with the RLDs demonstrated the best recognition rate, i.e., 97.49%, in comparison with 90.49% for LBPs. For the FEI image database, we obtained the best recognition rate, i.e., 93.57%, in comparison with 66.74% for LBPs. Using the RLDs and rotating the original images for FRAV3D, we improved the recognition rate by decreasing by approximately twice the number of errors. In addition, we analyzed the influence of different RLD parameters on the quality of facial recognition.
topic face recognition
Random Local Descriptor (RLD)
Local Binary Pattern (LBP) descriptor
Weber Local Descriptor (WLD)
PCNC neural classifier
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/11/1358
work_keys_str_mv AT airamcurtidor analysisofrandomlocaldescriptorsinfacerecognition
AT tetyanabaydyk analysisofrandomlocaldescriptorsinfacerecognition
AT ernstkussul analysisofrandomlocaldescriptorsinfacerecognition
_version_ 1721351211205001216