Capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networks

Abstract Herein, we compared the connectivity of resting-state networks between participants with high and low working memory capacity groups. Brain network connectivity was assessed under both resting and working memory task conditions. Task scans comprised dual-task (reading sentences while memori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariko Osaka, Mizuki Kaneda, Miyuki Azuma, Ken Yaoi, Tetsuya Shimokawa, Naoyuki Osaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-09-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98848-2
id doaj-4b741fe37d41484dbafc273a85b6986f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b741fe37d41484dbafc273a85b6986f2021-10-03T11:35:20ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-09-0111111110.1038/s41598-021-98848-2Capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networksMariko Osaka0Mizuki Kaneda1Miyuki Azuma2Ken Yaoi3Tetsuya Shimokawa4Naoyuki Osaka5Center for Information and Neural Networks, Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyCenter for Information and Neural Networks, Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyCenter for Information and Neural Networks, Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Kanazawa UniversityCenter for Information and Neural Networks, Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications TechnologyDepartment of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto UniversityAbstract Herein, we compared the connectivity of resting-state networks between participants with high and low working memory capacity groups. Brain network connectivity was assessed under both resting and working memory task conditions. Task scans comprised dual-task (reading sentences while memorizing target words) and single-task (reading sentences) conditions. The low capacity group showed relatively stronger connectivity during resting-state in most brain regions, and the high capacity group showed a stronger connectivity between the medial prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. During task performance, the dorsal attention and salience networks were relatively strongly connected in the high capacity group. In the comparison between dual- and single-task conditions, increased coupling between the anterior cingulate cortex and other attentional control-related areas were noted in the high capacity group. These findings suggest that working memory differences are related with network connectivity variations in attentional control-associated regions during both resting and task performance conditions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98848-2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariko Osaka
Mizuki Kaneda
Miyuki Azuma
Ken Yaoi
Tetsuya Shimokawa
Naoyuki Osaka
spellingShingle Mariko Osaka
Mizuki Kaneda
Miyuki Azuma
Ken Yaoi
Tetsuya Shimokawa
Naoyuki Osaka
Capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networks
Scientific Reports
author_facet Mariko Osaka
Mizuki Kaneda
Miyuki Azuma
Ken Yaoi
Tetsuya Shimokawa
Naoyuki Osaka
author_sort Mariko Osaka
title Capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networks
title_short Capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networks
title_full Capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networks
title_fullStr Capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networks
title_full_unstemmed Capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networks
title_sort capacity differences in working memory based on resting state brain networks
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Herein, we compared the connectivity of resting-state networks between participants with high and low working memory capacity groups. Brain network connectivity was assessed under both resting and working memory task conditions. Task scans comprised dual-task (reading sentences while memorizing target words) and single-task (reading sentences) conditions. The low capacity group showed relatively stronger connectivity during resting-state in most brain regions, and the high capacity group showed a stronger connectivity between the medial prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. During task performance, the dorsal attention and salience networks were relatively strongly connected in the high capacity group. In the comparison between dual- and single-task conditions, increased coupling between the anterior cingulate cortex and other attentional control-related areas were noted in the high capacity group. These findings suggest that working memory differences are related with network connectivity variations in attentional control-associated regions during both resting and task performance conditions.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98848-2
work_keys_str_mv AT marikoosaka capacitydifferencesinworkingmemorybasedonrestingstatebrainnetworks
AT mizukikaneda capacitydifferencesinworkingmemorybasedonrestingstatebrainnetworks
AT miyukiazuma capacitydifferencesinworkingmemorybasedonrestingstatebrainnetworks
AT kenyaoi capacitydifferencesinworkingmemorybasedonrestingstatebrainnetworks
AT tetsuyashimokawa capacitydifferencesinworkingmemorybasedonrestingstatebrainnetworks
AT naoyukiosaka capacitydifferencesinworkingmemorybasedonrestingstatebrainnetworks
_version_ 1716845342975066112