The Impact of Social and Cultural Difference in Relation to Job Loss and Financial Planning: Reflections on the Risk Society

This paper is based on data collected as part of a research study which looks at how different social and cultural groups frame, and respond to, the risk of income and/or job loss. Writers like LASH, DOUGLAS and LUPTON have placed an emphasis on the importance of group membership and social categori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Abbott, Deborah Quilgars, Anwen Jones
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2006-01-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/52
id doaj-4b6594d5605a4ebcbb8295cb59a531eb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b6594d5605a4ebcbb8295cb59a531eb2020-11-24T22:33:29ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272006-01-017151The Impact of Social and Cultural Difference in Relation to Job Loss and Financial Planning: Reflections on the Risk SocietyDavid Abbott0Deborah Quilgars1Anwen Jones2University of BristolUniversity of YorkUniversity of YorkThis paper is based on data collected as part of a research study which looks at how different social and cultural groups frame, and respond to, the risk of income and/or job loss. Writers like LASH, DOUGLAS and LUPTON have placed an emphasis on the importance of group membership and social categories in structuring response to different types of risk preferring to talk about "risk cultures" rather than "risk society". However, the writers acknowledge that there is little empirical research which explores this. As the first stage of our research, focus groups in two parts of the UK explored the relationship between risk and social difference with an emphasis on the risk of job or income loss. The groups were comprised of lesbian, gay and bisexual people; people from Black and Minority Ethnic backgrounds; Disabled people; and, people who actively practice a religion. Participants did not see strong links between their sexuality, race, or religion and their perceptions of, or responses to, risk. Income, and attitudinal factors were cited as being more important. Disabled people however were much more likely to make connections between being disabled and a range of barriers to responding to risky situations. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0601160http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/52riskincome and job losssocial and cultural difference
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Abbott
Deborah Quilgars
Anwen Jones
spellingShingle David Abbott
Deborah Quilgars
Anwen Jones
The Impact of Social and Cultural Difference in Relation to Job Loss and Financial Planning: Reflections on the Risk Society
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
risk
income and job loss
social and cultural difference
author_facet David Abbott
Deborah Quilgars
Anwen Jones
author_sort David Abbott
title The Impact of Social and Cultural Difference in Relation to Job Loss and Financial Planning: Reflections on the Risk Society
title_short The Impact of Social and Cultural Difference in Relation to Job Loss and Financial Planning: Reflections on the Risk Society
title_full The Impact of Social and Cultural Difference in Relation to Job Loss and Financial Planning: Reflections on the Risk Society
title_fullStr The Impact of Social and Cultural Difference in Relation to Job Loss and Financial Planning: Reflections on the Risk Society
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Social and Cultural Difference in Relation to Job Loss and Financial Planning: Reflections on the Risk Society
title_sort impact of social and cultural difference in relation to job loss and financial planning: reflections on the risk society
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2006-01-01
description This paper is based on data collected as part of a research study which looks at how different social and cultural groups frame, and respond to, the risk of income and/or job loss. Writers like LASH, DOUGLAS and LUPTON have placed an emphasis on the importance of group membership and social categories in structuring response to different types of risk preferring to talk about "risk cultures" rather than "risk society". However, the writers acknowledge that there is little empirical research which explores this. As the first stage of our research, focus groups in two parts of the UK explored the relationship between risk and social difference with an emphasis on the risk of job or income loss. The groups were comprised of lesbian, gay and bisexual people; people from Black and Minority Ethnic backgrounds; Disabled people; and, people who actively practice a religion. Participants did not see strong links between their sexuality, race, or religion and their perceptions of, or responses to, risk. Income, and attitudinal factors were cited as being more important. Disabled people however were much more likely to make connections between being disabled and a range of barriers to responding to risky situations. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0601160
topic risk
income and job loss
social and cultural difference
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/52
work_keys_str_mv AT davidabbott theimpactofsocialandculturaldifferenceinrelationtojoblossandfinancialplanningreflectionsontherisksociety
AT deborahquilgars theimpactofsocialandculturaldifferenceinrelationtojoblossandfinancialplanningreflectionsontherisksociety
AT anwenjones theimpactofsocialandculturaldifferenceinrelationtojoblossandfinancialplanningreflectionsontherisksociety
AT davidabbott impactofsocialandculturaldifferenceinrelationtojoblossandfinancialplanningreflectionsontherisksociety
AT deborahquilgars impactofsocialandculturaldifferenceinrelationtojoblossandfinancialplanningreflectionsontherisksociety
AT anwenjones impactofsocialandculturaldifferenceinrelationtojoblossandfinancialplanningreflectionsontherisksociety
_version_ 1725730824896118784