Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity

Canonical rational choice models of voter preferences assume that voters select candidates whose policy positions most closely match their own. Yet, much of the electorate often appears to prioritize identity variables (e.g., social categories, group membership) over policy considerations. Here, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Libby Jenke, Scott A. Huettel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566020/full
id doaj-4b61117beeed4dbbbeb675b6c45716d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b61117beeed4dbbbeb675b6c45716d52020-11-25T03:59:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-10-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.566020566020Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and IdentityLibby Jenke0Scott A. Huettel1Department of Political Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United StatesDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United StatesCanonical rational choice models of voter preferences assume that voters select candidates whose policy positions most closely match their own. Yet, much of the electorate often appears to prioritize identity variables (e.g., social categories, group membership) over policy considerations. Here, we report an empirical test of policy-identity interactions using surveys of likely voters conducted in the 24 hours before the 2016 United States presidential election and the 2018 United States senatorial elections. Each respondent indicated not only their policy preferences but also key social group identities and how those identities would be reinforced by voting. We observed striking evidence for a competition between policy and social group identification: For voters who exhibited the maximal effects of identity, policy positions were essentially irrelevant to their candidate preferences. These results account for dissociations between voters’ stated policy preferences and their voting behavior, while linking empirical observations of political behavior to new models derived from psychology and neuroscience.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566020/fulldecision makingpolitical sciencesocial cognitionvotingsocial identity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Libby Jenke
Scott A. Huettel
spellingShingle Libby Jenke
Scott A. Huettel
Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity
Frontiers in Psychology
decision making
political science
social cognition
voting
social identity
author_facet Libby Jenke
Scott A. Huettel
author_sort Libby Jenke
title Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity
title_short Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity
title_full Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity
title_fullStr Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity
title_full_unstemmed Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity
title_sort voter preferences reflect a competition between policy and identity
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Canonical rational choice models of voter preferences assume that voters select candidates whose policy positions most closely match their own. Yet, much of the electorate often appears to prioritize identity variables (e.g., social categories, group membership) over policy considerations. Here, we report an empirical test of policy-identity interactions using surveys of likely voters conducted in the 24 hours before the 2016 United States presidential election and the 2018 United States senatorial elections. Each respondent indicated not only their policy preferences but also key social group identities and how those identities would be reinforced by voting. We observed striking evidence for a competition between policy and social group identification: For voters who exhibited the maximal effects of identity, policy positions were essentially irrelevant to their candidate preferences. These results account for dissociations between voters’ stated policy preferences and their voting behavior, while linking empirical observations of political behavior to new models derived from psychology and neuroscience.
topic decision making
political science
social cognition
voting
social identity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566020/full
work_keys_str_mv AT libbyjenke voterpreferencesreflectacompetitionbetweenpolicyandidentity
AT scottahuettel voterpreferencesreflectacompetitionbetweenpolicyandidentity
_version_ 1724455482659176448