Ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]

This correspondence points out a need for clarification concerning the methodology utilized in the study “Eye tracking detects disconjugate eye movements associated with structural traumatic brain injury and concussion”, recently published in Journal of Neurotrauma. The authors of the paper state th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jun Maruta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2015-04-01
Series:F1000Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://f1000research.com/articles/4-71/v2
id doaj-4b3bbfad734141eabd4504a73428fce9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b3bbfad734141eabd4504a73428fce92020-11-25T03:05:56ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022015-04-01410.12688/f1000research.6162.26868Ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]Jun Maruta0Brain Trauma Foundation, One Broadway, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10007, USAThis correspondence points out a need for clarification concerning the methodology utilized in the study “Eye tracking detects disconjugate eye movements associated with structural traumatic brain injury and concussion”, recently published in Journal of Neurotrauma. The authors of the paper state that binocular eye movements were recorded using a single-camera video-oculography technique and that binocular disconjugate characteristics were analyzed without calibration of eye orientation. It is claimed that a variance-based disconjugacy metric was found to be sensitive to the severity of a concussive brain injury and to the status of recovery after the original injury. However, the reproducibility of the paper’s findings may be challenged simply by the paucity of details in the methodological description. More importantly, from the information supplied or cited in the paper, it is difficult to evaluate the validity of the potentially interesting conclusions of the paper.http://f1000research.com/articles/4-71/v2Low Vision
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jun Maruta
spellingShingle Jun Maruta
Ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]
F1000Research
Low Vision
author_facet Jun Maruta
author_sort Jun Maruta
title Ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]
title_short Ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]
title_full Ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]
title_fullStr Ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]
title_full_unstemmed Ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]
title_sort ocular disconjugacy cannot be measured without establishing a solid spatial reference [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5as]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2015-04-01
description This correspondence points out a need for clarification concerning the methodology utilized in the study “Eye tracking detects disconjugate eye movements associated with structural traumatic brain injury and concussion”, recently published in Journal of Neurotrauma. The authors of the paper state that binocular eye movements were recorded using a single-camera video-oculography technique and that binocular disconjugate characteristics were analyzed without calibration of eye orientation. It is claimed that a variance-based disconjugacy metric was found to be sensitive to the severity of a concussive brain injury and to the status of recovery after the original injury. However, the reproducibility of the paper’s findings may be challenged simply by the paucity of details in the methodological description. More importantly, from the information supplied or cited in the paper, it is difficult to evaluate the validity of the potentially interesting conclusions of the paper.
topic Low Vision
url http://f1000research.com/articles/4-71/v2
work_keys_str_mv AT junmaruta oculardisconjugacycannotbemeasuredwithoutestablishingasolidspatialreferencev2refstatusindexedhttpf1000res5as
_version_ 1724676412672049152