Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius

In the previous issue of Asian Studies (May 2020), Vytis Silius published a paper entitled Diversifying Academic Philosophy: The Post-Comparative Turn and Transculturalism, in which he dealt with some basic, significant and hitherto still unsolved questions regarding the so-called “post-comparative...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jana S. Rošker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts) 2020-09-01
Series:Asian Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/9575
id doaj-4b38adeb8f704acf826b91f14d02eafc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b38adeb8f704acf826b91f14d02eafc2021-04-02T12:11:12ZengZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)Asian Studies2232-51312350-42262020-09-018310.4312/as.2020.8.3.305-316Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis SiliusJana S. Rošker0University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts In the previous issue of Asian Studies (May 2020), Vytis Silius published a paper entitled Diversifying Academic Philosophy: The Post-Comparative Turn and Transculturalism, in which he dealt with some basic, significant and hitherto still unsolved questions regarding the so-called “post-comparative shift” in Chinese and intercultural philosophy. https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/9575Asian StudiesVytis SiliusDiversifying Academic PhilosophyChinese philosophy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jana S. Rošker
spellingShingle Jana S. Rošker
Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius
Asian Studies
Asian Studies
Vytis Silius
Diversifying Academic Philosophy
Chinese philosophy
author_facet Jana S. Rošker
author_sort Jana S. Rošker
title Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius
title_short Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius
title_full Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius
title_fullStr Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius
title_full_unstemmed Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius
title_sort chinese philosophy, “postcomparative” approaches and transcultural studies: a reply to vytis silius
publisher Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)
series Asian Studies
issn 2232-5131
2350-4226
publishDate 2020-09-01
description In the previous issue of Asian Studies (May 2020), Vytis Silius published a paper entitled Diversifying Academic Philosophy: The Post-Comparative Turn and Transculturalism, in which he dealt with some basic, significant and hitherto still unsolved questions regarding the so-called “post-comparative shift” in Chinese and intercultural philosophy.
topic Asian Studies
Vytis Silius
Diversifying Academic Philosophy
Chinese philosophy
url https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/9575
work_keys_str_mv AT janasrosker chinesephilosophypostcomparativeapproachesandtransculturalstudiesareplytovytissilius
_version_ 1721569921603731456