Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius
In the previous issue of Asian Studies (May 2020), Vytis Silius published a paper entitled Diversifying Academic Philosophy: The Post-Comparative Turn and Transculturalism, in which he dealt with some basic, significant and hitherto still unsolved questions regarding the so-called “post-comparative...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Asian Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/9575 |
id |
doaj-4b38adeb8f704acf826b91f14d02eafc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4b38adeb8f704acf826b91f14d02eafc2021-04-02T12:11:12ZengZnanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts)Asian Studies2232-51312350-42262020-09-018310.4312/as.2020.8.3.305-316Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis SiliusJana S. Rošker0University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts In the previous issue of Asian Studies (May 2020), Vytis Silius published a paper entitled Diversifying Academic Philosophy: The Post-Comparative Turn and Transculturalism, in which he dealt with some basic, significant and hitherto still unsolved questions regarding the so-called “post-comparative shift” in Chinese and intercultural philosophy. https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/9575Asian StudiesVytis SiliusDiversifying Academic PhilosophyChinese philosophy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jana S. Rošker |
spellingShingle |
Jana S. Rošker Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius Asian Studies Asian Studies Vytis Silius Diversifying Academic Philosophy Chinese philosophy |
author_facet |
Jana S. Rošker |
author_sort |
Jana S. Rošker |
title |
Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius |
title_short |
Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius |
title_full |
Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius |
title_fullStr |
Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius |
title_full_unstemmed |
Chinese Philosophy, “Postcomparative” Approaches and Transcultural Studies: A Reply to Vytis Silius |
title_sort |
chinese philosophy, “postcomparative” approaches and transcultural studies: a reply to vytis silius |
publisher |
Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani (Ljubljana University Press, Faculty of Arts) |
series |
Asian Studies |
issn |
2232-5131 2350-4226 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
In the previous issue of Asian Studies (May 2020), Vytis Silius published a paper entitled Diversifying Academic Philosophy: The Post-Comparative Turn and Transculturalism, in which he dealt with some basic, significant and hitherto still unsolved questions regarding the so-called “post-comparative shift” in Chinese and intercultural philosophy.
|
topic |
Asian Studies Vytis Silius Diversifying Academic Philosophy Chinese philosophy |
url |
https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/as/article/view/9575 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janasrosker chinesephilosophypostcomparativeapproachesandtransculturalstudiesareplytovytissilius |
_version_ |
1721569921603731456 |