Evaluation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory in a Danish Population

Objectives. To evaluate a Danish translation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI). Methods. The study included two groups: one comprised a random sample of 2000 individuals drawn from the Danish Civil Registration System; the other comprised 315 patients with chemica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sine Skovbjerg, Nikolaj Drimer Berg, Jesper Elberling, Karl Bang Christensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Environmental and Public Health
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/304314
id doaj-4b36c5d446e54ad5921d0d05f06e642b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b36c5d446e54ad5921d0d05f06e642b2020-11-24T22:27:31ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Environmental and Public Health1687-98051687-98132012-01-01201210.1155/2012/304314304314Evaluation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory in a Danish PopulationSine Skovbjerg0Nikolaj Drimer Berg1Jesper Elberling2Karl Bang Christensen3The Danish Research Centre for Chemical Sensitivities, Department of Dermato-Allergology, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2820 Gentofte, DenmarkResearch Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2600 Glostrup, DenmarkThe Danish Research Centre for Chemical Sensitivities, Department of Dermato-Allergology, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2820 Gentofte, DenmarkSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1165 Copenhagen, DenmarkObjectives. To evaluate a Danish translation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI). Methods. The study included two groups: one comprised a random sample of 2000 individuals drawn from the Danish Civil Registration System; the other comprised 315 patients with chemical intolerance. Results. The evaluation suggested good reliability for the four QEESI scales in terms of internal consistency and coefficients between test and retest scores. The discriminatory validity was the largest for the Chemical (inhalant) Intolerance and Life Impact Scales. Using combined cut-off scores for these two scales provided a sensitivity of 92.1 and a specificity of 91.8 and yielded a prevalence of 8.2% in the population group. Conclusions. The Danish translation of the QEESI showed overall good reliability and validity. We recommend the use of the combined Chemical (inhalant) Intolerance and Life Impact Scales in future studies.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/304314
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sine Skovbjerg
Nikolaj Drimer Berg
Jesper Elberling
Karl Bang Christensen
spellingShingle Sine Skovbjerg
Nikolaj Drimer Berg
Jesper Elberling
Karl Bang Christensen
Evaluation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory in a Danish Population
Journal of Environmental and Public Health
author_facet Sine Skovbjerg
Nikolaj Drimer Berg
Jesper Elberling
Karl Bang Christensen
author_sort Sine Skovbjerg
title Evaluation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory in a Danish Population
title_short Evaluation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory in a Danish Population
title_full Evaluation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory in a Danish Population
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory in a Danish Population
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory in a Danish Population
title_sort evaluation of the quick environmental exposure and sensitivity inventory in a danish population
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Environmental and Public Health
issn 1687-9805
1687-9813
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Objectives. To evaluate a Danish translation of the Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI). Methods. The study included two groups: one comprised a random sample of 2000 individuals drawn from the Danish Civil Registration System; the other comprised 315 patients with chemical intolerance. Results. The evaluation suggested good reliability for the four QEESI scales in terms of internal consistency and coefficients between test and retest scores. The discriminatory validity was the largest for the Chemical (inhalant) Intolerance and Life Impact Scales. Using combined cut-off scores for these two scales provided a sensitivity of 92.1 and a specificity of 91.8 and yielded a prevalence of 8.2% in the population group. Conclusions. The Danish translation of the QEESI showed overall good reliability and validity. We recommend the use of the combined Chemical (inhalant) Intolerance and Life Impact Scales in future studies.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/304314
work_keys_str_mv AT sineskovbjerg evaluationofthequickenvironmentalexposureandsensitivityinventoryinadanishpopulation
AT nikolajdrimerberg evaluationofthequickenvironmentalexposureandsensitivityinventoryinadanishpopulation
AT jesperelberling evaluationofthequickenvironmentalexposureandsensitivityinventoryinadanishpopulation
AT karlbangchristensen evaluationofthequickenvironmentalexposureandsensitivityinventoryinadanishpopulation
_version_ 1725749589018935296