Choosing the perfect shot - The loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.

Images in health communication have been shown to affect perspectives and attitudes towards health issues including vaccination. We seek to quantify the frequency of images used in online news coverage of vaccines that may convey varying sentiments about vaccination. To capture a breadth of vaccine-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew G Wu, Ashish S Shah, Tara S Haelle, Scott A Lunos, Michael B Pitt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6021096?pdf=render
id doaj-4b35bc7f564d4af68b5421ea837b065e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b35bc7f564d4af68b5421ea837b065e2020-11-25T02:05:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01136e019987010.1371/journal.pone.0199870Choosing the perfect shot - The loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.Andrew G WuAshish S ShahTara S HaelleScott A LunosMichael B PittImages in health communication have been shown to affect perspectives and attitudes towards health issues including vaccination. We seek to quantify the frequency of images used in online news coverage of vaccines that may convey varying sentiments about vaccination. To capture a breadth of vaccine-related news coverage, including international sources, we searched the following terms in Google News Archives: "autism and vaccine", "flu and vaccine", and "measles and Disneyland". We developed a coding tool that classified images as negative (eg, screaming child), positive (eg, happy child), neutral (eg, vaccine vial), or irrelevant (eg, picture of journalist). All images were coded independently by two researchers and discussed for consensus. We analyzed 734 images. Of the images which featured vaccines and/or a medical encounter (322), 28% had negative features and 30% had positive features. The remaining 137 images (43%) were neutral. There was no statistically significant difference between proportions of negative and positive imagery for each pair of search terms, which may be a reflection of random image selection. Ultimately, nearly one in eight images included in vaccine-related news coverage contains negative features which may be selected without careful consideration of the potential negative impact on public health initiatives regarding vaccination.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6021096?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrew G Wu
Ashish S Shah
Tara S Haelle
Scott A Lunos
Michael B Pitt
spellingShingle Andrew G Wu
Ashish S Shah
Tara S Haelle
Scott A Lunos
Michael B Pitt
Choosing the perfect shot - The loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Andrew G Wu
Ashish S Shah
Tara S Haelle
Scott A Lunos
Michael B Pitt
author_sort Andrew G Wu
title Choosing the perfect shot - The loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.
title_short Choosing the perfect shot - The loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.
title_full Choosing the perfect shot - The loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.
title_fullStr Choosing the perfect shot - The loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.
title_full_unstemmed Choosing the perfect shot - The loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.
title_sort choosing the perfect shot - the loaded narrative of imagery in online news coverage of vaccines.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Images in health communication have been shown to affect perspectives and attitudes towards health issues including vaccination. We seek to quantify the frequency of images used in online news coverage of vaccines that may convey varying sentiments about vaccination. To capture a breadth of vaccine-related news coverage, including international sources, we searched the following terms in Google News Archives: "autism and vaccine", "flu and vaccine", and "measles and Disneyland". We developed a coding tool that classified images as negative (eg, screaming child), positive (eg, happy child), neutral (eg, vaccine vial), or irrelevant (eg, picture of journalist). All images were coded independently by two researchers and discussed for consensus. We analyzed 734 images. Of the images which featured vaccines and/or a medical encounter (322), 28% had negative features and 30% had positive features. The remaining 137 images (43%) were neutral. There was no statistically significant difference between proportions of negative and positive imagery for each pair of search terms, which may be a reflection of random image selection. Ultimately, nearly one in eight images included in vaccine-related news coverage contains negative features which may be selected without careful consideration of the potential negative impact on public health initiatives regarding vaccination.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6021096?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewgwu choosingtheperfectshottheloadednarrativeofimageryinonlinenewscoverageofvaccines
AT ashishsshah choosingtheperfectshottheloadednarrativeofimageryinonlinenewscoverageofvaccines
AT tarashaelle choosingtheperfectshottheloadednarrativeofimageryinonlinenewscoverageofvaccines
AT scottalunos choosingtheperfectshottheloadednarrativeofimageryinonlinenewscoverageofvaccines
AT michaelbpitt choosingtheperfectshottheloadednarrativeofimageryinonlinenewscoverageofvaccines
_version_ 1724937975624630272