Drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap?
The aim of this article is to discuss and problematize how teachers in civics in upper secondary school construct drama, and how it relates to teaching, and students’ knowledge formation in civics. A study like this is important as the aesthetic subjects are becoming more prominent in young people’s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
Karlstads Universitet
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-34620 |
id |
doaj-4b216a053144403390c0e2c727484682 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4b216a053144403390c0e2c7274846822020-11-25T00:53:06ZdanKarlstads Universitet Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education2000-98792000-98792014-12-0120142014:297115Drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap? Evelina Möllenborg Kristina HolmbergThe aim of this article is to discuss and problematize how teachers in civics in upper secondary school construct drama, and how it relates to teaching, and students’ knowledge formation in civics. A study like this is important as the aesthetic subjects are becoming more prominent in young people’s everyday life at the same time as school by recent reformations is increasing the adjustment to efficiency and measurability. The theoretical framework is built on discursive psychology, which emanates from social constructionist and poststructuralist theory. Data consists of interviews with four upper secondary teachers in civics. Findings show that drama can be a valuable resource for teaching and learning civics, but also a problem when it comes to assessment. The position of the student as an object, teaching as entertainment and the domination of text is also discussed and problematized. Findings are considered as problematic as drama in civics, in relation to assessment, rather enhances a text-focused three-subject school than offering an alternative challenge.http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-34620 CIVICSAESTHETICSDRAMADISCOURSE ANALYSISUPPER SECONDARY SCHOOL |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Danish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Evelina Möllenborg Kristina Holmberg |
spellingShingle |
Evelina Möllenborg Kristina Holmberg Drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap? Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education CIVICS AESTHETICS DRAMA DISCOURSE ANALYSIS UPPER SECONDARY SCHOOL |
author_facet |
Evelina Möllenborg Kristina Holmberg |
author_sort |
Evelina Möllenborg |
title |
Drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap? |
title_short |
Drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap? |
title_full |
Drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap? |
title_fullStr |
Drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap? |
title_sort |
drama – viktig resurs eller hämmare för undervisningen i samhällskunskap? |
publisher |
Karlstads Universitet |
series |
Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education |
issn |
2000-9879 2000-9879 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
The aim of this article is to discuss and problematize how teachers in civics in upper secondary school construct drama, and how it relates to teaching, and students’ knowledge formation in civics. A study like this is important as the aesthetic subjects are becoming more prominent in young people’s everyday life at the same time as school by recent reformations is increasing the adjustment to efficiency and measurability. The theoretical framework is built on discursive psychology, which emanates from social constructionist and poststructuralist theory. Data consists of interviews with four upper secondary teachers in civics. Findings show that drama can be a valuable resource for teaching and learning civics, but also a problem when it comes to assessment. The position of the student as an object, teaching as entertainment and the domination of text is also discussed and problematized. Findings are considered as problematic as drama in civics, in relation to assessment, rather enhances a text-focused three-subject school than offering an alternative challenge. |
topic |
CIVICS AESTHETICS DRAMA DISCOURSE ANALYSIS UPPER SECONDARY SCHOOL |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-34620 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT evelinamollenborg dramaviktigresursellerhammareforundervisningenisamhallskunskap AT kristinaholmberg dramaviktigresursellerhammareforundervisningenisamhallskunskap |
_version_ |
1725239251187007488 |