Analphabetism in the 21st Century and its Legal Consequences

Every day we must note the main differences between well educated people and less ones. In fact,we can describe the human life like a continuous struggle between the pretensions: few people are to wellinformed, and the others cannot fulfill the same level. But these words are less important as conve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marius Vacarelu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Danubius University 2011-05-01
Series:EIRP Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/733/661
id doaj-4b16b0c7351d4f29add980cae29833c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b16b0c7351d4f29add980cae29833c32020-11-24T22:36:07ZengDanubius UniversityEIRP Proceedings2067-92112069-93442011-05-01619094Analphabetism in the 21st Century and its Legal ConsequencesMarius VacareluEvery day we must note the main differences between well educated people and less ones. In fact,we can describe the human life like a continuous struggle between the pretensions: few people are to wellinformed, and the others cannot fulfill the same level. But these words are less important as conversation; thedifference is created by the modernization of the technology. In this case, population is forced to learn newskills, but there is, somehow, a real disproportion between the result: not everyone is able to learn well all thenew vocabulary, the new ideas of work and the new instruments of working, as computer or many others. Inthe same time, we must note that large categories of population, despite of free access to the education are nottrying to adapt to the modern provocations: more than that, they are not able to understand new ideas or newtechnologies. However, they live as normal persons, make juridical act and represent subject for juridicalreports. They are subjects of any branch of law, as the constitutions allowed. But this difference creates aquestion: can be a real gap between the ability to understand public or private law and its consequences?And, in this case, it might be possible to imagine some distinction between these kinds of persons? In ouropinion, next years might be able to introduce this subject on public debate agenda, and we must find – fromnow – an answer: the humanity of today is quite strange, and from this part of life surprises are always ready.The specialists of law cannot stay in former reality; they must imagine new provocations and new answers. Inour opinion, this direction is important for next years, and our text will try to find an answer for that.http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/733/661analphabetismfunctional analphabetismjuridical re-dimension of societynew legal order
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marius Vacarelu
spellingShingle Marius Vacarelu
Analphabetism in the 21st Century and its Legal Consequences
EIRP Proceedings
analphabetism
functional analphabetism
juridical re-dimension of society
new legal order
author_facet Marius Vacarelu
author_sort Marius Vacarelu
title Analphabetism in the 21st Century and its Legal Consequences
title_short Analphabetism in the 21st Century and its Legal Consequences
title_full Analphabetism in the 21st Century and its Legal Consequences
title_fullStr Analphabetism in the 21st Century and its Legal Consequences
title_full_unstemmed Analphabetism in the 21st Century and its Legal Consequences
title_sort analphabetism in the 21st century and its legal consequences
publisher Danubius University
series EIRP Proceedings
issn 2067-9211
2069-9344
publishDate 2011-05-01
description Every day we must note the main differences between well educated people and less ones. In fact,we can describe the human life like a continuous struggle between the pretensions: few people are to wellinformed, and the others cannot fulfill the same level. But these words are less important as conversation; thedifference is created by the modernization of the technology. In this case, population is forced to learn newskills, but there is, somehow, a real disproportion between the result: not everyone is able to learn well all thenew vocabulary, the new ideas of work and the new instruments of working, as computer or many others. Inthe same time, we must note that large categories of population, despite of free access to the education are nottrying to adapt to the modern provocations: more than that, they are not able to understand new ideas or newtechnologies. However, they live as normal persons, make juridical act and represent subject for juridicalreports. They are subjects of any branch of law, as the constitutions allowed. But this difference creates aquestion: can be a real gap between the ability to understand public or private law and its consequences?And, in this case, it might be possible to imagine some distinction between these kinds of persons? In ouropinion, next years might be able to introduce this subject on public debate agenda, and we must find – fromnow – an answer: the humanity of today is quite strange, and from this part of life surprises are always ready.The specialists of law cannot stay in former reality; they must imagine new provocations and new answers. Inour opinion, this direction is important for next years, and our text will try to find an answer for that.
topic analphabetism
functional analphabetism
juridical re-dimension of society
new legal order
url http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/733/661
work_keys_str_mv AT mariusvacarelu analphabetisminthe21stcenturyanditslegalconsequences
_version_ 1725721242183401472