Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The Best Possible Self (BPS) exercise promotes a positive view of oneself in the best possible future, after working hard towards it. Since the first work that attempted to examine the benefits of this intervention in 2001, studies on the BPS have grown exponentially and, currently, this is one of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alba Carrillo, María Rubio-Aparicio, Guadalupe Molinari, Ángel Enrique, Julio Sánchez-Meca, Rosa M Baños
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222386
id doaj-4b14181f7a814c15bec99ec196571624
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4b14181f7a814c15bec99ec1965716242021-03-03T21:07:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01149e022238610.1371/journal.pone.0222386Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Alba CarrilloMaría Rubio-AparicioGuadalupe MolinariÁngel EnriqueJulio Sánchez-MecaRosa M BañosThe Best Possible Self (BPS) exercise promotes a positive view of oneself in the best possible future, after working hard towards it. Since the first work that attempted to examine the benefits of this intervention in 2001, studies on the BPS have grown exponentially and, currently, this is one of the most widely used Positive Psychology Interventions. However, little is yet known about its overall effectiveness in increasing wellbeing outcomes. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis is to shed light on this question. A systematic literature search was conducted, and 29 studies (in 26 articles) met the inclusion criteria of empirically testing the intervention and comparing it to a control condition. In addition, BPS was compared to gratitude interventions in some of the included studies. A total of 2,909 participants were involved in the analyses. The outcome measures were wellbeing, optimism, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Results showed that the BPS is an effective intervention to improve wellbeing (d+ = .325), optimism (d+ = .334) and positive affect (d+ = .511) comparing to controls. Small effect sizes were obtained for negative affect and depressive symptoms. Moderator analyses did not show statistically significant results for wellbeing, except for a trend towards significance in the age of the participants (years) and the magnitude of the intervention (total minutes of practice). In addition, the BPS was found to be more beneficial for positive and negative affect than gratitude interventions (d+ = .326 and d+ = .485, respectively). These results indicate that the BPS can be considered a valuable Positive Psychology Intervention to improve clients' wellbeing, and it seems that it might be more effective for older participants and with shorter practices (measured as total minutes of practice).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222386
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alba Carrillo
María Rubio-Aparicio
Guadalupe Molinari
Ángel Enrique
Julio Sánchez-Meca
Rosa M Baños
spellingShingle Alba Carrillo
María Rubio-Aparicio
Guadalupe Molinari
Ángel Enrique
Julio Sánchez-Meca
Rosa M Baños
Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Alba Carrillo
María Rubio-Aparicio
Guadalupe Molinari
Ángel Enrique
Julio Sánchez-Meca
Rosa M Baños
author_sort Alba Carrillo
title Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_short Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of the Best Possible Self intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
title_sort effects of the best possible self intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The Best Possible Self (BPS) exercise promotes a positive view of oneself in the best possible future, after working hard towards it. Since the first work that attempted to examine the benefits of this intervention in 2001, studies on the BPS have grown exponentially and, currently, this is one of the most widely used Positive Psychology Interventions. However, little is yet known about its overall effectiveness in increasing wellbeing outcomes. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis is to shed light on this question. A systematic literature search was conducted, and 29 studies (in 26 articles) met the inclusion criteria of empirically testing the intervention and comparing it to a control condition. In addition, BPS was compared to gratitude interventions in some of the included studies. A total of 2,909 participants were involved in the analyses. The outcome measures were wellbeing, optimism, depressive symptoms, and positive and negative affect. Results showed that the BPS is an effective intervention to improve wellbeing (d+ = .325), optimism (d+ = .334) and positive affect (d+ = .511) comparing to controls. Small effect sizes were obtained for negative affect and depressive symptoms. Moderator analyses did not show statistically significant results for wellbeing, except for a trend towards significance in the age of the participants (years) and the magnitude of the intervention (total minutes of practice). In addition, the BPS was found to be more beneficial for positive and negative affect than gratitude interventions (d+ = .326 and d+ = .485, respectively). These results indicate that the BPS can be considered a valuable Positive Psychology Intervention to improve clients' wellbeing, and it seems that it might be more effective for older participants and with shorter practices (measured as total minutes of practice).
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222386
work_keys_str_mv AT albacarrillo effectsofthebestpossibleselfinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mariarubioaparicio effectsofthebestpossibleselfinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guadalupemolinari effectsofthebestpossibleselfinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT angelenrique effectsofthebestpossibleselfinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT juliosanchezmeca effectsofthebestpossibleselfinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rosambanos effectsofthebestpossibleselfinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1714818656030949376