Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism
Purpose: Does surgical approach (minimally invasive vs. open) and type (radical vs. partial nephrectomy) affects opioid use and workplace absenteeism. Materials and Methods: Retrospective multivariable regression analysis of 2,646 opioid-naïve patients between 18 and 64 undergoing radical or partial...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Urological Association
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Investigative and Clinical Urology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20200194 |
id |
doaj-4b00203e791243b2a63862ec77a0bdee |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marieke J. Krimphove Stephen W. Reese Xi Chen Maya Marchese Daniel Pucheril Eugene Cone Wesley Chou Karl H. Tully Adam S. Kibel Richard D. Urman Steven L. Chang Luis A. Kluth Prokar Dasgupta Quoc-Dien Trinh |
spellingShingle |
Marieke J. Krimphove Stephen W. Reese Xi Chen Maya Marchese Daniel Pucheril Eugene Cone Wesley Chou Karl H. Tully Adam S. Kibel Richard D. Urman Steven L. Chang Luis A. Kluth Prokar Dasgupta Quoc-Dien Trinh Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism Investigative and Clinical Urology absenteeism kidney neoplasm minimally invasive surgical procedures nephrectomy opioids |
author_facet |
Marieke J. Krimphove Stephen W. Reese Xi Chen Maya Marchese Daniel Pucheril Eugene Cone Wesley Chou Karl H. Tully Adam S. Kibel Richard D. Urman Steven L. Chang Luis A. Kluth Prokar Dasgupta Quoc-Dien Trinh |
author_sort |
Marieke J. Krimphove |
title |
Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism |
title_short |
Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism |
title_full |
Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism |
title_fullStr |
Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism |
title_sort |
recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: opioid use and workplace absenteeism |
publisher |
Korean Urological Association |
series |
Investigative and Clinical Urology |
issn |
2466-0493 2466-054X |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Purpose: Does surgical approach (minimally invasive vs. open) and type (radical vs. partial nephrectomy) affects opioid use and workplace absenteeism. Materials and Methods: Retrospective multivariable regression analysis of 2,646 opioid-naïve patients between 18 and 64 undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy via either a minimally invasive vs. open approach for kidney cancer in the United States between 2012 and 2017 drawn from the IBM Watson Health Database was performed. Outcomes included: (1) opioid use in opioid-naïve patients as measured by opioid prescriptions in the post-operative setting at early, intermediate and prolonged time periods and (2) workplace absenteeism after surgery. Results: Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery had a lower odds of opioid use in the early and intermediate post-operative periods (early: odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–0.97; p=0.02, intermediate: OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48–0.75; p<0.01), but not in the prolonged setting (prolonged: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75–1.34; p=0.98) and had earlier return to work (minimally invasive vs. open: −10.53 days; 95% CI, −17.79 to −3.26; p<0.01). Controlling for approach, patient undergoing partial nephrectomy had lower rates of opioid use across all time periods examined and returned to work earlier than patients undergoing radical nephrectomy (partial vs. radical: −14.41 days; 95% CI, −21.22 to −7.60; p<0.01). Conclusions: Patients undergoing various forms of surgery for kidney cancer had lower rates of peri-operative opioid use, fewer days of workplace absenteeism, but no difference in long-term rates of opioid use in patients undergoing minimally invasive as compared to open surgery. |
topic |
absenteeism kidney neoplasm minimally invasive surgical procedures nephrectomy opioids |
url |
https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20200194 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariekejkrimphove recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT stephenwreese recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT xichen recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT mayamarchese recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT danielpucheril recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT eugenecone recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT wesleychou recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT karlhtully recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT adamskibel recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT richarddurman recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT stevenlchang recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT luisakluth recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT prokardasgupta recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism AT quocdientrinh recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism |
_version_ |
1724345704558624768 |
spelling |
doaj-4b00203e791243b2a63862ec77a0bdee2021-01-08T01:03:21ZengKorean Urological AssociationInvestigative and Clinical Urology2466-04932466-054X2021-01-01621566410.4111/icu.20200194Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeismMarieke J. Krimphove 0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7121-3818Stephen W. Reese 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7486-0674Xi Chen 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-6605Maya Marchese 3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1915-5793Daniel Pucheril 4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8578-7716Eugene Cone 5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-7534Wesley Chou 6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9345-5287Karl H. Tully 7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9499-0169Adam S. Kibel 8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-7781Richard D. Urman 9https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-5977Steven L. Chang 10https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-5861Luis A. Kluth 11https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-4388Prokar Dasgupta 12https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-0445Quoc-Dien Trinh13https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-9276Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.Department of Urology, King's College London, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Purpose: Does surgical approach (minimally invasive vs. open) and type (radical vs. partial nephrectomy) affects opioid use and workplace absenteeism. Materials and Methods: Retrospective multivariable regression analysis of 2,646 opioid-naïve patients between 18 and 64 undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy via either a minimally invasive vs. open approach for kidney cancer in the United States between 2012 and 2017 drawn from the IBM Watson Health Database was performed. Outcomes included: (1) opioid use in opioid-naïve patients as measured by opioid prescriptions in the post-operative setting at early, intermediate and prolonged time periods and (2) workplace absenteeism after surgery. Results: Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery had a lower odds of opioid use in the early and intermediate post-operative periods (early: odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–0.97; p=0.02, intermediate: OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48–0.75; p<0.01), but not in the prolonged setting (prolonged: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75–1.34; p=0.98) and had earlier return to work (minimally invasive vs. open: −10.53 days; 95% CI, −17.79 to −3.26; p<0.01). Controlling for approach, patient undergoing partial nephrectomy had lower rates of opioid use across all time periods examined and returned to work earlier than patients undergoing radical nephrectomy (partial vs. radical: −14.41 days; 95% CI, −21.22 to −7.60; p<0.01). Conclusions: Patients undergoing various forms of surgery for kidney cancer had lower rates of peri-operative opioid use, fewer days of workplace absenteeism, but no difference in long-term rates of opioid use in patients undergoing minimally invasive as compared to open surgery.https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20200194absenteeismkidney neoplasmminimally invasive surgical proceduresnephrectomyopioids |