Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism

Purpose: Does surgical approach (minimally invasive vs. open) and type (radical vs. partial nephrectomy) affects opioid use and workplace absenteeism. Materials and Methods: Retrospective multivariable regression analysis of 2,646 opioid-naïve patients between 18 and 64 undergoing radical or partial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marieke J. Krimphove, Stephen W. Reese, Xi Chen, Maya Marchese, Daniel Pucheril, Eugene Cone, Wesley Chou, Karl H. Tully, Adam S. Kibel, Richard D. Urman, Steven L. Chang, Luis A. Kluth, Prokar Dasgupta, Quoc-Dien Trinh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Urological Association 2021-01-01
Series:Investigative and Clinical Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20200194
id doaj-4b00203e791243b2a63862ec77a0bdee
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marieke J. Krimphove
Stephen W. Reese
Xi Chen
Maya Marchese
Daniel Pucheril
Eugene Cone
Wesley Chou
Karl H. Tully
Adam S. Kibel
Richard D. Urman
Steven L. Chang
Luis A. Kluth
Prokar Dasgupta
Quoc-Dien Trinh
spellingShingle Marieke J. Krimphove
Stephen W. Reese
Xi Chen
Maya Marchese
Daniel Pucheril
Eugene Cone
Wesley Chou
Karl H. Tully
Adam S. Kibel
Richard D. Urman
Steven L. Chang
Luis A. Kluth
Prokar Dasgupta
Quoc-Dien Trinh
Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism
Investigative and Clinical Urology
absenteeism
kidney neoplasm
minimally invasive surgical procedures
nephrectomy
opioids
author_facet Marieke J. Krimphove
Stephen W. Reese
Xi Chen
Maya Marchese
Daniel Pucheril
Eugene Cone
Wesley Chou
Karl H. Tully
Adam S. Kibel
Richard D. Urman
Steven L. Chang
Luis A. Kluth
Prokar Dasgupta
Quoc-Dien Trinh
author_sort Marieke J. Krimphove
title Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism
title_short Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism
title_full Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism
title_fullStr Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism
title_full_unstemmed Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeism
title_sort recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: opioid use and workplace absenteeism
publisher Korean Urological Association
series Investigative and Clinical Urology
issn 2466-0493
2466-054X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: Does surgical approach (minimally invasive vs. open) and type (radical vs. partial nephrectomy) affects opioid use and workplace absenteeism. Materials and Methods: Retrospective multivariable regression analysis of 2,646 opioid-naïve patients between 18 and 64 undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy via either a minimally invasive vs. open approach for kidney cancer in the United States between 2012 and 2017 drawn from the IBM Watson Health Database was performed. Outcomes included: (1) opioid use in opioid-naïve patients as measured by opioid prescriptions in the post-operative setting at early, intermediate and prolonged time periods and (2) workplace absenteeism after surgery. Results: Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery had a lower odds of opioid use in the early and intermediate post-operative periods (early: odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–0.97; p=0.02, intermediate: OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48–0.75; p<0.01), but not in the prolonged setting (prolonged: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75–1.34; p=0.98) and had earlier return to work (minimally invasive vs. open: −10.53 days; 95% CI, −17.79 to −3.26; p<0.01). Controlling for approach, patient undergoing partial nephrectomy had lower rates of opioid use across all time periods examined and returned to work earlier than patients undergoing radical nephrectomy (partial vs. radical: −14.41 days; 95% CI, −21.22 to −7.60; p<0.01). Conclusions: Patients undergoing various forms of surgery for kidney cancer had lower rates of peri-operative opioid use, fewer days of workplace absenteeism, but no difference in long-term rates of opioid use in patients undergoing minimally invasive as compared to open surgery.
topic absenteeism
kidney neoplasm
minimally invasive surgical procedures
nephrectomy
opioids
url https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20200194
work_keys_str_mv AT mariekejkrimphove recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT stephenwreese recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT xichen recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT mayamarchese recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT danielpucheril recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT eugenecone recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT wesleychou recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT karlhtully recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT adamskibel recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT richarddurman recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT stevenlchang recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT luisakluth recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT prokardasgupta recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
AT quocdientrinh recoveryfromminimallyinvasivevsopensurgeryinkidneycancerpatientsopioiduseandworkplaceabsenteeism
_version_ 1724345704558624768
spelling doaj-4b00203e791243b2a63862ec77a0bdee2021-01-08T01:03:21ZengKorean Urological AssociationInvestigative and Clinical Urology2466-04932466-054X2021-01-01621566410.4111/icu.20200194Recovery from minimally invasive vs. open surgery in kidney cancer patients: Opioid use and workplace absenteeismMarieke J. Krimphove 0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7121-3818Stephen W. Reese 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7486-0674Xi Chen 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-6605Maya Marchese 3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1915-5793Daniel Pucheril 4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8578-7716Eugene Cone 5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-7534Wesley Chou 6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9345-5287Karl H. Tully 7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9499-0169Adam S. Kibel 8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-7781Richard D. Urman 9https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-5977Steven L. Chang 10https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-5861Luis A. Kluth 11https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-4388Prokar Dasgupta 12https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-0445Quoc-Dien Trinh13https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-9276Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.Department of Urology, King's College London, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.Purpose: Does surgical approach (minimally invasive vs. open) and type (radical vs. partial nephrectomy) affects opioid use and workplace absenteeism. Materials and Methods: Retrospective multivariable regression analysis of 2,646 opioid-naïve patients between 18 and 64 undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy via either a minimally invasive vs. open approach for kidney cancer in the United States between 2012 and 2017 drawn from the IBM Watson Health Database was performed. Outcomes included: (1) opioid use in opioid-naïve patients as measured by opioid prescriptions in the post-operative setting at early, intermediate and prolonged time periods and (2) workplace absenteeism after surgery. Results: Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery had a lower odds of opioid use in the early and intermediate post-operative periods (early: odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–0.97; p=0.02, intermediate: OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48–0.75; p<0.01), but not in the prolonged setting (prolonged: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75–1.34; p=0.98) and had earlier return to work (minimally invasive vs. open: −10.53 days; 95% CI, −17.79 to −3.26; p<0.01). Controlling for approach, patient undergoing partial nephrectomy had lower rates of opioid use across all time periods examined and returned to work earlier than patients undergoing radical nephrectomy (partial vs. radical: −14.41 days; 95% CI, −21.22 to −7.60; p<0.01). Conclusions: Patients undergoing various forms of surgery for kidney cancer had lower rates of peri-operative opioid use, fewer days of workplace absenteeism, but no difference in long-term rates of opioid use in patients undergoing minimally invasive as compared to open surgery.https://www.icurology.org/pdf/10.4111/icu.20200194absenteeismkidney neoplasmminimally invasive surgical proceduresnephrectomyopioids