Comparison of efficacy, safety, and costs between neoadjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma
Abstract Background We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) and conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer. Materials and Methods Overall, 110 patients with esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant ch...
Main Authors: | Jiahua Lyu, Tao Liu, Tao Li, Fang Li, Qifeng Wang, Jie Wang, Yongtao Han, Junchao Wang, Jun Zhang, Lin Peng, Jinyi Lang |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Cancer Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2250 |
Similar Items
-
Comparing hypofractionated to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review
by: Lei Liu, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
The Feasibility Study of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy with Regional Hyperthermia in Soft Tissue Sarcomas
by: Mateusz Jacek Spałek, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Combination With Chemotherapy Improves Outcome of Patients With Esophageal Carcinoma Tracheoesophageal Groove Lymph Node Metastasis
by: Jian Wang, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01) -
Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with intermediate- to high-risk localized prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
by: Wei Guo, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
A comparative study of hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer patients
by: Kartick Rastogi, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)