The Corpus: A Tool among Others
The corpus was, is and will be a valuable tool that helps pursuing a goal. Its ontological status as a tool will not change, no matter how fabulous the computational power, storage capacity, access and transmission speed, and whatever the size of the corpus. The corpus is a data source among others...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO
2014-02-01
|
Series: | Corela |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/corela/3006 |
id |
doaj-4ad0e7e0e2544c199b770a186a1ed24d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4ad0e7e0e2544c199b770a186a1ed24d2020-11-25T00:12:52ZengCercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICOCorela1638-573X2014-02-0110.4000/corela.3006The Corpus: A Tool among OthersTobias ScheerThe corpus was, is and will be a valuable tool that helps pursuing a goal. Its ontological status as a tool will not change, no matter how fabulous the computational power, storage capacity, access and transmission speed, and whatever the size of the corpus. The corpus is a data source among others (namely grammaticality judgements), which has specific advantages and limitations that the user needs to be aware of – like for any other tool.Drowned in the ambient utilitarianism and project-hysteria, many people believe, overtly or tacitly (or without being aware that they do), that research which involves the building of a corpus coupled with exploitation by a "powerful" computer programme, is more serious than a competitor which does not. Some even believe that the whole purpose of a research project may be the creation of a corpus, and that the corpus will produce science by itself, i.e. substitute itself to reasoning and the data-expectation dialectic. The same ideology promotes the idea that whatever scientific statement is made, it needs to be statistically relevant. This is where the corpus stops being a tool, i.e. where the system goes mad. And it did on a large scale in the past decade or so. Poor corpora are in the middle of this thunderstorm, and are abundantly abused by the ideology in place.http://journals.openedition.org/corela/3006corpustoolproject hysteriafund raisingirrational research politicsDürrenmatt's law |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tobias Scheer |
spellingShingle |
Tobias Scheer The Corpus: A Tool among Others Corela corpus tool project hysteria fund raising irrational research politics Dürrenmatt's law |
author_facet |
Tobias Scheer |
author_sort |
Tobias Scheer |
title |
The Corpus: A Tool among Others |
title_short |
The Corpus: A Tool among Others |
title_full |
The Corpus: A Tool among Others |
title_fullStr |
The Corpus: A Tool among Others |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Corpus: A Tool among Others |
title_sort |
corpus: a tool among others |
publisher |
Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO |
series |
Corela |
issn |
1638-573X |
publishDate |
2014-02-01 |
description |
The corpus was, is and will be a valuable tool that helps pursuing a goal. Its ontological status as a tool will not change, no matter how fabulous the computational power, storage capacity, access and transmission speed, and whatever the size of the corpus. The corpus is a data source among others (namely grammaticality judgements), which has specific advantages and limitations that the user needs to be aware of – like for any other tool.Drowned in the ambient utilitarianism and project-hysteria, many people believe, overtly or tacitly (or without being aware that they do), that research which involves the building of a corpus coupled with exploitation by a "powerful" computer programme, is more serious than a competitor which does not. Some even believe that the whole purpose of a research project may be the creation of a corpus, and that the corpus will produce science by itself, i.e. substitute itself to reasoning and the data-expectation dialectic. The same ideology promotes the idea that whatever scientific statement is made, it needs to be statistically relevant. This is where the corpus stops being a tool, i.e. where the system goes mad. And it did on a large scale in the past decade or so. Poor corpora are in the middle of this thunderstorm, and are abundantly abused by the ideology in place. |
topic |
corpus tool project hysteria fund raising irrational research politics Dürrenmatt's law |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/corela/3006 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tobiasscheer thecorpusatoolamongothers AT tobiasscheer corpusatoolamongothers |
_version_ |
1725397053768466432 |