The Parliamentary Legitimacy of the European Union: The Role of the States General within the European Union

This article presents the state of play in the Netherlands with regard to parliamentary scrutiny in EU decision-making. Although the States General have all in all dealt with EU decision-making fairly actively, this contribution makes clear that Parliament's activity has not been able to offset...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonard F.M. Besselink, Brecht van Mourik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Utrecht University School of Law 2012-01-01
Series:Utrecht Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.179/
id doaj-4ac88ed4930f497a8a567068765ae3ef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ac88ed4930f497a8a567068765ae3ef2020-11-25T03:18:17ZengUtrecht University School of LawUtrecht Law Review1871-515X2012-01-0181285010.18352/ulr.179174The Parliamentary Legitimacy of the European Union: The Role of the States General within the European UnionLeonard F.M. Besselink0Brecht van Mourik1Utrecht University School of LawUtrecht University School of LawThis article presents the state of play in the Netherlands with regard to parliamentary scrutiny in EU decision-making. Although the States General have all in all dealt with EU decision-making fairly actively, this contribution makes clear that Parliament's activity has not been able to offset the increased executive dominance in matters of European integration. The abolition of the consent requirement had immediate negative effects on the information position of Parliament, which is crucial for the attempts by Parliament to counteract the increased executive dominance. Furthermore, the aspect of Parliament's role in the legitimacy of the EU itself is discussed. The 'European instruments', such as the subsidiarity review, the Barroso initiative and the access of parliaments to the European Court of Justice have some general shortcomings. Practice shows, however, that most of these instruments have been used, though with different degrees of intensity and continuity in the two Houses of Parliament and their different parliamentary committees.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.179/national parliamentsthe Netherlandsparliamentary scrutiny
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leonard F.M. Besselink
Brecht van Mourik
spellingShingle Leonard F.M. Besselink
Brecht van Mourik
The Parliamentary Legitimacy of the European Union: The Role of the States General within the European Union
Utrecht Law Review
national parliaments
the Netherlands
parliamentary scrutiny
author_facet Leonard F.M. Besselink
Brecht van Mourik
author_sort Leonard F.M. Besselink
title The Parliamentary Legitimacy of the European Union: The Role of the States General within the European Union
title_short The Parliamentary Legitimacy of the European Union: The Role of the States General within the European Union
title_full The Parliamentary Legitimacy of the European Union: The Role of the States General within the European Union
title_fullStr The Parliamentary Legitimacy of the European Union: The Role of the States General within the European Union
title_full_unstemmed The Parliamentary Legitimacy of the European Union: The Role of the States General within the European Union
title_sort parliamentary legitimacy of the european union: the role of the states general within the european union
publisher Utrecht University School of Law
series Utrecht Law Review
issn 1871-515X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description This article presents the state of play in the Netherlands with regard to parliamentary scrutiny in EU decision-making. Although the States General have all in all dealt with EU decision-making fairly actively, this contribution makes clear that Parliament's activity has not been able to offset the increased executive dominance in matters of European integration. The abolition of the consent requirement had immediate negative effects on the information position of Parliament, which is crucial for the attempts by Parliament to counteract the increased executive dominance. Furthermore, the aspect of Parliament's role in the legitimacy of the EU itself is discussed. The 'European instruments', such as the subsidiarity review, the Barroso initiative and the access of parliaments to the European Court of Justice have some general shortcomings. Practice shows, however, that most of these instruments have been used, though with different degrees of intensity and continuity in the two Houses of Parliament and their different parliamentary committees.
topic national parliaments
the Netherlands
parliamentary scrutiny
url http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/10.18352/ulr.179/
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardfmbesselink theparliamentarylegitimacyoftheeuropeanuniontheroleofthestatesgeneralwithintheeuropeanunion
AT brechtvanmourik theparliamentarylegitimacyoftheeuropeanuniontheroleofthestatesgeneralwithintheeuropeanunion
AT leonardfmbesselink parliamentarylegitimacyoftheeuropeanuniontheroleofthestatesgeneralwithintheeuropeanunion
AT brechtvanmourik parliamentarylegitimacyoftheeuropeanuniontheroleofthestatesgeneralwithintheeuropeanunion
_version_ 1724627786882088960