Optimal Design for Estimating Parameters of the 4-Parameter Hill Model

Many drug concentration-effect relationships are described by nonlinear sigmoid models. The 4-parameter Hill model, which belongs to this class, is commonly used. An experimental design is essential to accurately estimate the parameters of the model. In this report we investigate properties of D-opt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonid A. Khinkis, Laurence Levasseur, Hélène Faessel, William R. Greco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2003-07-01
Series:Dose-Response
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/15401420390249925
id doaj-4a984e09216b4974ad910752c8a6c9c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a984e09216b4974ad910752c8a6c9c92020-11-25T02:58:08ZengSAGE PublishingDose-Response1559-32582003-07-01110.1080/15401420390249925Optimal Design for Estimating Parameters of the 4-Parameter Hill ModelLeonid A. Khinkis0Laurence LevasseurHélène FaesselWilliam R. Greco1 Department of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, U.S.A. Department of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, U.S.A.Many drug concentration-effect relationships are described by nonlinear sigmoid models. The 4-parameter Hill model, which belongs to this class, is commonly used. An experimental design is essential to accurately estimate the parameters of the model. In this report we investigate properties of D-optimal designs. D-optimal designs minimize the volume of the confidence region for the parameter estimates or, equivalently, minimize the determinant of the variance-covariance matrix of the estimated parameters. It is assumed that the variance of the random error is proportional to some power of the response. To generate D-optimal designs one needs to assume the values of the parameters. Even when these preliminary guesses about the parameter values are appreciably different from the true values of the parameters, the D-optimal designs produce satisfactory results. This property of D-optimal designs is called robustness. It can be quantified by using D-efficiency. A five-point design consisting of four D-optimal points and an extra fifth point is introduced with the goals to increase robustness and to better characterize the middle part of the Hill curve. Four-point D-optimal designs are then compared to five-point designs and to log-spread designs, both theoretically and practically with laboratory experiments. D-optimal designs proved themselves to be practical and useful when the true underlying model is known, when good prior knowledge of parameters is available, and when experimental units are dear. The goal of this report is to give the practitioner a better understanding for D-optimal designs as a useful tool for the routine planning of laboratory experiments.https://doi.org/10.1080/15401420390249925
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leonid A. Khinkis
Laurence Levasseur
Hélène Faessel
William R. Greco
spellingShingle Leonid A. Khinkis
Laurence Levasseur
Hélène Faessel
William R. Greco
Optimal Design for Estimating Parameters of the 4-Parameter Hill Model
Dose-Response
author_facet Leonid A. Khinkis
Laurence Levasseur
Hélène Faessel
William R. Greco
author_sort Leonid A. Khinkis
title Optimal Design for Estimating Parameters of the 4-Parameter Hill Model
title_short Optimal Design for Estimating Parameters of the 4-Parameter Hill Model
title_full Optimal Design for Estimating Parameters of the 4-Parameter Hill Model
title_fullStr Optimal Design for Estimating Parameters of the 4-Parameter Hill Model
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Design for Estimating Parameters of the 4-Parameter Hill Model
title_sort optimal design for estimating parameters of the 4-parameter hill model
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Dose-Response
issn 1559-3258
publishDate 2003-07-01
description Many drug concentration-effect relationships are described by nonlinear sigmoid models. The 4-parameter Hill model, which belongs to this class, is commonly used. An experimental design is essential to accurately estimate the parameters of the model. In this report we investigate properties of D-optimal designs. D-optimal designs minimize the volume of the confidence region for the parameter estimates or, equivalently, minimize the determinant of the variance-covariance matrix of the estimated parameters. It is assumed that the variance of the random error is proportional to some power of the response. To generate D-optimal designs one needs to assume the values of the parameters. Even when these preliminary guesses about the parameter values are appreciably different from the true values of the parameters, the D-optimal designs produce satisfactory results. This property of D-optimal designs is called robustness. It can be quantified by using D-efficiency. A five-point design consisting of four D-optimal points and an extra fifth point is introduced with the goals to increase robustness and to better characterize the middle part of the Hill curve. Four-point D-optimal designs are then compared to five-point designs and to log-spread designs, both theoretically and practically with laboratory experiments. D-optimal designs proved themselves to be practical and useful when the true underlying model is known, when good prior knowledge of parameters is available, and when experimental units are dear. The goal of this report is to give the practitioner a better understanding for D-optimal designs as a useful tool for the routine planning of laboratory experiments.
url https://doi.org/10.1080/15401420390249925
work_keys_str_mv AT leonidakhinkis optimaldesignforestimatingparametersofthe4parameterhillmodel
AT laurencelevasseur optimaldesignforestimatingparametersofthe4parameterhillmodel
AT helenefaessel optimaldesignforestimatingparametersofthe4parameterhillmodel
AT williamrgreco optimaldesignforestimatingparametersofthe4parameterhillmodel
_version_ 1724708297407201280