Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?
Objective: Cardiovascular disease manifestation and several associated surrogate markers, such as vitamin D, have shown substantial seasonal variation. A promising cardiovascular biomarker, soluble ST2 (sST2), has not been investigated in this regard – we therefore determined if systemic levels of s...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bioscientifica
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Endocrine Connections |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/8/6/EC-19-0090.xml |
id |
doaj-4a94d42764bd4d9f9c4fa96944572c98 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Vito Francic Martin Keppel Verena Schwetz Christian Trummer Marlene Pandis Valentin Borzan Martin R Grübler Nicolas D Verheyen Marcus E Kleber Graciela Delgado Angela P Moissl Benjamin Dieplinger Winfried März Andreas Tomaschitz Stefan Pilz Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch |
spellingShingle |
Vito Francic Martin Keppel Verena Schwetz Christian Trummer Marlene Pandis Valentin Borzan Martin R Grübler Nicolas D Verheyen Marcus E Kleber Graciela Delgado Angela P Moissl Benjamin Dieplinger Winfried März Andreas Tomaschitz Stefan Pilz Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons? Endocrine Connections soluble ST2 seasonality vitamin D biomarker cardiovascular disease |
author_facet |
Vito Francic Martin Keppel Verena Schwetz Christian Trummer Marlene Pandis Valentin Borzan Martin R Grübler Nicolas D Verheyen Marcus E Kleber Graciela Delgado Angela P Moissl Benjamin Dieplinger Winfried März Andreas Tomaschitz Stefan Pilz Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch |
author_sort |
Vito Francic |
title |
Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons? |
title_short |
Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons? |
title_full |
Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons? |
title_fullStr |
Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons? |
title_sort |
are soluble st2 levels influenced by vitamin d and/or the seasons? |
publisher |
Bioscientifica |
series |
Endocrine Connections |
issn |
2049-3614 2049-3614 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Objective: Cardiovascular disease manifestation and several associated surrogate markers, such as vitamin D, have shown substantial seasonal variation. A promising cardiovascular biomarker, soluble ST2 (sST2), has not been investigated in this regard – we therefore determined if systemic levels of sST2 are affected by seasonality and/or vitamin D in order to investigate their clinical interrelation and usability.
Design: sST2 levels were measured in two cohorts involving hypertensive patients at cardiovascular risk, the Styrian Vitamin D Hypertension Trial (study A; RCT design, 8 weeks 2800 IU cholecalciferol daily) and the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study (LURIC; study B; cross-sectional design).
Methods: The effects of a vitamin D intervention on sST2 levels were determined in study A using ANCOVA, while seasonality of sST2 levels was determined in study B using ANOVA.
Results: The concentrations of sST2 remained unchanged by a vitamin D intervention in study A, with a mean treatment effect (95% confidence interval) of 0.1 (−0.6 to 0.8) ng/mL; P = 0.761), despite a rise in 25(OH)D (11.3 (9.2–13.5) ng/mL; P < 0.001) compared to placebo. In study B, seasonal variations were present in 25(OH)D levels in men and women with or without heart failure (P < 0.001 for all subgroups), while sST2 levels remained unaffected by the seasons in all subgroups.
Conclusions: Our study provides the first evidence that systemic sST2 levels are not interrelated with vitamin D levels or influenced by the seasons in subjects at cardiovascular risk. |
topic |
soluble ST2 seasonality vitamin D biomarker cardiovascular disease |
url |
https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/8/6/EC-19-0090.xml |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vitofrancic aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT martinkeppel aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT verenaschwetz aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT christiantrummer aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT marlenepandis aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT valentinborzan aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT martinrgrubler aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT nicolasdverheyen aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT marcusekleber aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT gracieladelgado aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT angelapmoissl aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT benjamindieplinger aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT winfriedmarz aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT andreastomaschitz aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT stefanpilz aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons AT barbaraobermayerpietsch aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons |
_version_ |
1725804616585576448 |
spelling |
doaj-4a94d42764bd4d9f9c4fa96944572c982020-11-24T22:11:41ZengBioscientificaEndocrine Connections2049-36142049-36142019-05-0186691700https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-19-0090Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?Vito Francic0Martin Keppel1Verena Schwetz2Christian Trummer3Marlene Pandis4Valentin Borzan5Martin R Grübler6Nicolas D Verheyen7Marcus E Kleber8Graciela Delgado9Angela P Moissl10Benjamin Dieplinger11Winfried März12Andreas Tomaschitz13Stefan Pilz14Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch15Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaVth Department of Medicine (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyVth Department of Medicine (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyVth Department of Medicine (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brueder Linz, Linz, AustriaVth Department of Medicine (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Synlab Academy, Synlab Holding Germany GmbH, Heidelberg, GermanySpecialist Clinic of Rehabilitation Bad Gleichenberg, Bad Gleichenberg, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaObjective: Cardiovascular disease manifestation and several associated surrogate markers, such as vitamin D, have shown substantial seasonal variation. A promising cardiovascular biomarker, soluble ST2 (sST2), has not been investigated in this regard – we therefore determined if systemic levels of sST2 are affected by seasonality and/or vitamin D in order to investigate their clinical interrelation and usability. Design: sST2 levels were measured in two cohorts involving hypertensive patients at cardiovascular risk, the Styrian Vitamin D Hypertension Trial (study A; RCT design, 8 weeks 2800 IU cholecalciferol daily) and the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study (LURIC; study B; cross-sectional design). Methods: The effects of a vitamin D intervention on sST2 levels were determined in study A using ANCOVA, while seasonality of sST2 levels was determined in study B using ANOVA. Results: The concentrations of sST2 remained unchanged by a vitamin D intervention in study A, with a mean treatment effect (95% confidence interval) of 0.1 (−0.6 to 0.8) ng/mL; P = 0.761), despite a rise in 25(OH)D (11.3 (9.2–13.5) ng/mL; P < 0.001) compared to placebo. In study B, seasonal variations were present in 25(OH)D levels in men and women with or without heart failure (P < 0.001 for all subgroups), while sST2 levels remained unaffected by the seasons in all subgroups. Conclusions: Our study provides the first evidence that systemic sST2 levels are not interrelated with vitamin D levels or influenced by the seasons in subjects at cardiovascular risk.https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/8/6/EC-19-0090.xmlsoluble ST2seasonalityvitamin Dbiomarkercardiovascular disease |