Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?

Objective: Cardiovascular disease manifestation and several associated surrogate markers, such as vitamin D, have shown substantial seasonal variation. A promising cardiovascular biomarker, soluble ST2 (sST2), has not been investigated in this regard – we therefore determined if systemic levels of s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vito Francic, Martin Keppel, Verena Schwetz, Christian Trummer, Marlene Pandis, Valentin Borzan, Martin R Grübler, Nicolas D Verheyen, Marcus E Kleber, Graciela Delgado, Angela P Moissl, Benjamin Dieplinger, Winfried März, Andreas Tomaschitz, Stefan Pilz, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bioscientifica 2019-05-01
Series:Endocrine Connections
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/8/6/EC-19-0090.xml
id doaj-4a94d42764bd4d9f9c4fa96944572c98
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vito Francic
Martin Keppel
Verena Schwetz
Christian Trummer
Marlene Pandis
Valentin Borzan
Martin R Grübler
Nicolas D Verheyen
Marcus E Kleber
Graciela Delgado
Angela P Moissl
Benjamin Dieplinger
Winfried März
Andreas Tomaschitz
Stefan Pilz
Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
spellingShingle Vito Francic
Martin Keppel
Verena Schwetz
Christian Trummer
Marlene Pandis
Valentin Borzan
Martin R Grübler
Nicolas D Verheyen
Marcus E Kleber
Graciela Delgado
Angela P Moissl
Benjamin Dieplinger
Winfried März
Andreas Tomaschitz
Stefan Pilz
Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?
Endocrine Connections
soluble ST2
seasonality
vitamin D
biomarker
cardiovascular disease
author_facet Vito Francic
Martin Keppel
Verena Schwetz
Christian Trummer
Marlene Pandis
Valentin Borzan
Martin R Grübler
Nicolas D Verheyen
Marcus E Kleber
Graciela Delgado
Angela P Moissl
Benjamin Dieplinger
Winfried März
Andreas Tomaschitz
Stefan Pilz
Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
author_sort Vito Francic
title Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?
title_short Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?
title_full Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?
title_fullStr Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?
title_full_unstemmed Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?
title_sort are soluble st2 levels influenced by vitamin d and/or the seasons?
publisher Bioscientifica
series Endocrine Connections
issn 2049-3614
2049-3614
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Objective: Cardiovascular disease manifestation and several associated surrogate markers, such as vitamin D, have shown substantial seasonal variation. A promising cardiovascular biomarker, soluble ST2 (sST2), has not been investigated in this regard – we therefore determined if systemic levels of sST2 are affected by seasonality and/or vitamin D in order to investigate their clinical interrelation and usability. Design: sST2 levels were measured in two cohorts involving hypertensive patients at cardiovascular risk, the Styrian Vitamin D Hypertension Trial (study A; RCT design, 8 weeks 2800 IU cholecalciferol daily) and the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study (LURIC; study B; cross-sectional design). Methods: The effects of a vitamin D intervention on sST2 levels were determined in study A using ANCOVA, while seasonality of sST2 levels was determined in study B using ANOVA. Results: The concentrations of sST2 remained unchanged by a vitamin D intervention in study A, with a mean treatment effect (95% confidence interval) of 0.1 (−0.6 to 0.8) ng/mL; P = 0.761), despite a rise in 25(OH)D (11.3 (9.2–13.5) ng/mL; P < 0.001) compared to placebo. In study B, seasonal variations were present in 25(OH)D levels in men and women with or without heart failure (P < 0.001 for all subgroups), while sST2 levels remained unaffected by the seasons in all subgroups. Conclusions: Our study provides the first evidence that systemic sST2 levels are not interrelated with vitamin D levels or influenced by the seasons in subjects at cardiovascular risk.
topic soluble ST2
seasonality
vitamin D
biomarker
cardiovascular disease
url https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/8/6/EC-19-0090.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT vitofrancic aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT martinkeppel aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT verenaschwetz aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT christiantrummer aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT marlenepandis aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT valentinborzan aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT martinrgrubler aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT nicolasdverheyen aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT marcusekleber aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT gracieladelgado aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT angelapmoissl aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT benjamindieplinger aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT winfriedmarz aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT andreastomaschitz aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT stefanpilz aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
AT barbaraobermayerpietsch aresolublest2levelsinfluencedbyvitamindandortheseasons
_version_ 1725804616585576448
spelling doaj-4a94d42764bd4d9f9c4fa96944572c982020-11-24T22:11:41ZengBioscientificaEndocrine Connections2049-36142049-36142019-05-0186691700https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-19-0090Are soluble ST2 levels influenced by vitamin D and/or the seasons?Vito Francic0Martin Keppel1Verena Schwetz2Christian Trummer3Marlene Pandis4Valentin Borzan5Martin R Grübler6Nicolas D Verheyen7Marcus E Kleber8Graciela Delgado9Angela P Moissl10Benjamin Dieplinger11Winfried März12Andreas Tomaschitz13Stefan Pilz14Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch15Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaVth Department of Medicine (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyVth Department of Medicine (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyVth Department of Medicine (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, GermanyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brueder Linz, Linz, AustriaVth Department of Medicine (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Diabetology), Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; Synlab Academy, Synlab Holding Germany GmbH, Heidelberg, GermanySpecialist Clinic of Rehabilitation Bad Gleichenberg, Bad Gleichenberg, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, AustriaObjective: Cardiovascular disease manifestation and several associated surrogate markers, such as vitamin D, have shown substantial seasonal variation. A promising cardiovascular biomarker, soluble ST2 (sST2), has not been investigated in this regard – we therefore determined if systemic levels of sST2 are affected by seasonality and/or vitamin D in order to investigate their clinical interrelation and usability. Design: sST2 levels were measured in two cohorts involving hypertensive patients at cardiovascular risk, the Styrian Vitamin D Hypertension Trial (study A; RCT design, 8 weeks 2800 IU cholecalciferol daily) and the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study (LURIC; study B; cross-sectional design). Methods: The effects of a vitamin D intervention on sST2 levels were determined in study A using ANCOVA, while seasonality of sST2 levels was determined in study B using ANOVA. Results: The concentrations of sST2 remained unchanged by a vitamin D intervention in study A, with a mean treatment effect (95% confidence interval) of 0.1 (−0.6 to 0.8) ng/mL; P = 0.761), despite a rise in 25(OH)D (11.3 (9.2–13.5) ng/mL; P < 0.001) compared to placebo. In study B, seasonal variations were present in 25(OH)D levels in men and women with or without heart failure (P < 0.001 for all subgroups), while sST2 levels remained unaffected by the seasons in all subgroups. Conclusions: Our study provides the first evidence that systemic sST2 levels are not interrelated with vitamin D levels or influenced by the seasons in subjects at cardiovascular risk.https://ec.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/ec/8/6/EC-19-0090.xmlsoluble ST2seasonalityvitamin Dbiomarkercardiovascular disease