SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education

One of the more challenging areas of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) research can be navigating the components of human subjects research protections implemented by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The authors of this article, a faculty developer and a current and former research co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathryn E. Linder, E. Deborah Elek, Lucia Calderon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing 2014-05-01
Series:Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
IRB
Online Access:https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/4217
id doaj-4a8f2a2c136344b6ac79b42dfa237baa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4a8f2a2c136344b6ac79b42dfa237baa2020-11-24T22:20:29ZengIndiana University Office of Scholarly PublishingJournal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1527-93162014-05-0114210.14434/josotl.v14i2.4217SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher educationKathryn E. Linder0E. Deborah Elek1Lucia Calderon2Director, Center for Teaching Excellence Suffolk UniversitySuffolk UniversityIndependent ResearcherOne of the more challenging areas of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) research can be navigating the components of human subjects research protections implemented by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The authors of this article, a faculty developer and a current and former research compliance coordinator, discuss the history of IRB in relation to SoTL research and explicate some of the foundational components of IRB protocols for SoTL projects. In particular, the authors explore what constitutes “research” for SoTL projects, explain the different IRB types of review, and offer some sample SoTL projects with respect to their IRB implications.https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/4217Institutional Review BoardIRBhuman subjects
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kathryn E. Linder
E. Deborah Elek
Lucia Calderon
spellingShingle Kathryn E. Linder
E. Deborah Elek
Lucia Calderon
SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Institutional Review Board
IRB
human subjects
author_facet Kathryn E. Linder
E. Deborah Elek
Lucia Calderon
author_sort Kathryn E. Linder
title SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education
title_short SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education
title_full SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education
title_fullStr SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education
title_full_unstemmed SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education
title_sort sotl and the institutional review board: considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education
publisher Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing
series Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
issn 1527-9316
publishDate 2014-05-01
description One of the more challenging areas of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) research can be navigating the components of human subjects research protections implemented by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The authors of this article, a faculty developer and a current and former research compliance coordinator, discuss the history of IRB in relation to SoTL research and explicate some of the foundational components of IRB protocols for SoTL projects. In particular, the authors explore what constitutes “research” for SoTL projects, explain the different IRB types of review, and offer some sample SoTL projects with respect to their IRB implications.
topic Institutional Review Board
IRB
human subjects
url https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/4217
work_keys_str_mv AT kathrynelinder sotlandtheinstitutionalreviewboardconsiderationsbeforenavigatingtheapplicationprocessforclassroomresearchinhighereducation
AT edeborahelek sotlandtheinstitutionalreviewboardconsiderationsbeforenavigatingtheapplicationprocessforclassroomresearchinhighereducation
AT luciacalderon sotlandtheinstitutionalreviewboardconsiderationsbeforenavigatingtheapplicationprocessforclassroomresearchinhighereducation
_version_ 1725775009900658688