SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education
One of the more challenging areas of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) research can be navigating the components of human subjects research protections implemented by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The authors of this article, a faculty developer and a current and former research co...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing
2014-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/4217 |
id |
doaj-4a8f2a2c136344b6ac79b42dfa237baa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4a8f2a2c136344b6ac79b42dfa237baa2020-11-24T22:20:29ZengIndiana University Office of Scholarly PublishingJournal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1527-93162014-05-0114210.14434/josotl.v14i2.4217SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher educationKathryn E. Linder0E. Deborah Elek1Lucia Calderon2Director, Center for Teaching Excellence Suffolk UniversitySuffolk UniversityIndependent ResearcherOne of the more challenging areas of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) research can be navigating the components of human subjects research protections implemented by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The authors of this article, a faculty developer and a current and former research compliance coordinator, discuss the history of IRB in relation to SoTL research and explicate some of the foundational components of IRB protocols for SoTL projects. In particular, the authors explore what constitutes “research” for SoTL projects, explain the different IRB types of review, and offer some sample SoTL projects with respect to their IRB implications.https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/4217Institutional Review BoardIRBhuman subjects |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kathryn E. Linder E. Deborah Elek Lucia Calderon |
spellingShingle |
Kathryn E. Linder E. Deborah Elek Lucia Calderon SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Institutional Review Board IRB human subjects |
author_facet |
Kathryn E. Linder E. Deborah Elek Lucia Calderon |
author_sort |
Kathryn E. Linder |
title |
SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education |
title_short |
SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education |
title_full |
SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education |
title_fullStr |
SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education |
title_full_unstemmed |
SoTL and the Institutional Review Board: Considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education |
title_sort |
sotl and the institutional review board: considerations before navigating the application process for classroom research in higher education |
publisher |
Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing |
series |
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning |
issn |
1527-9316 |
publishDate |
2014-05-01 |
description |
One of the more challenging areas of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) research can be navigating the components of human subjects research protections implemented by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The authors of this article, a faculty developer and a current and former research compliance coordinator, discuss the history of IRB in relation to SoTL research and explicate some of the foundational components of IRB protocols for SoTL projects. In particular, the authors explore what constitutes “research” for SoTL projects, explain the different IRB types of review, and offer some sample SoTL projects with respect to their IRB implications. |
topic |
Institutional Review Board IRB human subjects |
url |
https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/4217 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kathrynelinder sotlandtheinstitutionalreviewboardconsiderationsbeforenavigatingtheapplicationprocessforclassroomresearchinhighereducation AT edeborahelek sotlandtheinstitutionalreviewboardconsiderationsbeforenavigatingtheapplicationprocessforclassroomresearchinhighereducation AT luciacalderon sotlandtheinstitutionalreviewboardconsiderationsbeforenavigatingtheapplicationprocessforclassroomresearchinhighereducation |
_version_ |
1725775009900658688 |